• Anti Weeb Penguin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I built that ROM back in june and honestly, i don’t recommend it, the interface and apps are just terrible and they take almost a year to release a new android version.

  • nope@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Probably not the first degoogled android, but maybe one of the first ‘just works’ degoogled phones Edit: yep I misread but still true

    • n2burns@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      At no point does the article claim it is “the first degoogled android”.

      • Captain_Ender@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I see the confusion by op. It says privacy-first, as in privacy is its core function not a first in its class. I think they just misread the title.

  • Azzu@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Have been using it for a while on my Fairphone 3, just works nicely :)

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    First up, instead of the usual Google gubbins, replete with the adtech giant’s commercial trackers, /e/OS users will find a set of native open source apps and services Murena has developed to replace all that.

    Murena also bakes a set of “advanced” private browsing features into the OS, including a tracker blocker; a location faking option; and the ability to hide your IP address.

    On the flip side, when all the switches are set to off each one displays a one-word warning — either “Vulnerable” or “Exposed” — giving users a visible nudge to think about how their online activity might be compromising their privacy.

    And this tension between locking everything down (to achieve perfect privacy) and opening select hatches (to boost utility) remains the core confounder for such an ambitious against-the-mainstream-grain tech endeavour.

    The wider question is how much highly motivated demand there is to put in the small amount of extra effort required (and possibly also shell out some additional cost) to tread an alternative, less feature-rich path — if, at the end of the day, all you get for your effect is a product that won’t look or feel especially thrilling.

    So its conviction of where the mobile puck is headed must be that there’s a growing pool of mainstream Android users with an appetite for iOS-style ‘low friction’ privacy delivered outside Apple’s walled ecosystem.


    The original article contains 2,593 words, the summary contains 228 words. Saved 91%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • MotherFlocker@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wish I could try it out but couldn’t successfully install it on my device. So I’m sticking with LOS. LOS is already good enough (if not great) as it’s stable and gets update more often.

  • Gunpachi@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hope more newer phones get supported by them.

    I have a samsung galaxy s23 and I need to scratch my de-google / custom rom itch.

  • tallwookie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    kind of looks like trash. 1gb of free cloud storage is nothing. no appstore at all, just Fdroid with a different interface, a handful of 3rd party apps that I’ve never heard of.

    pass

    • bug@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      But it does have an app store, one that functions similarly to Aurora. Also nothing is forcing you to use that cloud storage, use whichever you want!