critical minds want to know the answer to this question

  • h6a@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    With enough funding, I will finish my research on the Hilbert space of genders where every particle in every possible reality has a one-to-one correspondence to a gender. I call it the “Everettian gender hypercontinuum”.

  • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’d say finite, up to 8.1 billion options. My throught process is that what isn’t alive doesn’t count.

  • RadioRat (he/they)@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I guess it depends on whether we’re willing to say a gender exists if theoretically possible though not ever embodied. Will artificial sapients have gender identities?

  • jeff 👨‍💻@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m way overthinking this, but I’m going with finite. It could be an unfathomably large number, but gender is a human construct and there are a finite number of humans. Let’s say each human that ever lives has a unique gender identity - there could be billions or trillions, but it would still be finite.

    • Match!!@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      what about Genders Georg, who lives in a cave and has uncountably many genders all by xemself?

      • jeff 👨‍💻@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I thought something similar, but the human brain is finite, so I don’t think a single person could have an uncountably infinite gender; unfathomably large, maybe, but it would still be finite.

        Edit: I’m not trying to be bigoted here. If someone does identify that way I don’t want to discredit your identity.

        • polonius-rex@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          A single human brain is finite, but the possible configurations of neurons across any possible hypothetical brain is decidedly infinite.

    • polonius-rex@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      but you could birth a new person who didn’t fit that finite number

      there will always be a hypothetical new person who could exist

      • J Lou@mastodon.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        There are finite number of possible humans due to there being a finite number of states a brain can be in.

        There is an argument for moral realism that takes advantage of finiteness and computability of mental processes to show that there could be an objective morality

        @askbeehaw

        • polonius-rex@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          a finite number of states a brain can be in

          there are infinite ways to arrange and configure finite neurons

          computability of mental processes

          are mental processes entirely computable though? you kind of run into a halting-problem-style issue because if you can compute your response to anything that should imply that you can never make a decision that surprises the computation. but if you feed knowledge of the computation’s result into your decision making process you can just pick the opposite

          • Zadig@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            there are infinite ways to arrange and configure finite neurons

            hm? i don’t see how this is true at all. a finite of anything in a finite space can only have finite configurations.