It barely fits in the bloody car park. So bad for pedestrians and the environment.

  • 5redie8@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hi American here - please don’t let those things take over your roads, it sucks for all the reasons you think it does

  • Viper_NZ@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    But now that Holden have stopped making Commodores, how else are you meant to show you’re a dickhead?

  • bkmps3@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’re every inconvenience rolled in to one. A pain to get in. A pain to park. Use heaps of fuel. Don’t fit in garages, and to top it off are expensive AF. I’m confident in saying unless you tow like, horse floats on the regular, if you own one you’re a fucking idiot.

    • Takatakatakatakatak@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They’re not actually that bad on fuel. Don’t get me wrong, I’d never own one but a few of our major players at work have them as some sort of status symbol. Cruising in overdrive at 100km/h they can go as low as 6L/100km, but average is around 12L/100km unless you are doing lots of hunting through the gearbox or driving like a dick, then you can see some truly disturbing fuel usage figures.

      To put it in perspective, this is on par with a modern hilux, and WORLDS better than the 2022 79 series landcruiser even with all the fuel efficiency gains they made.

      To be clear I still don’t think anyone should be driving one here - our roads and car parks are simply not built for them. They aren’t that great offroad either. Really the only genuine use case is towing an enormous caravan down the hwy, in which case I hate you anyway because that’s TWO symbols of you being an inconsiderate prick that doesn’t care about anyone else.

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re also way more dangerous. They do more damage if they hit something, and because of the terrible visibility they’re more likely to hit something.

      That said, if they do hit something, the people inside the tank might be ok.

      • R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        They are more likely to roll than normal cars (SUVs excluded), and when they roll they’re generally more likely to crush the roof due to their weight. So yeah, while they’re better off than the car they hit, they’re still not amazing safety wise.

        • Recant@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          While true on the more likely to roll due to their higher center of gravity, unless they are lowered after purchased, I was surprised to find that at least for the f150, the roof strength is almost 6 times the weight of the truck.

          That’s according to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety which is an independent review organization that gave the f150 one of its highest ratings.

          More information is here: https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle/ford/f-150-crew-cab-pickup/2021

  • shirro@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    For complete fairness to everyone we should tax every vehicle on road or path from scooters and bikes to b-doubles based on the 4th power of axle load to properly account for the impact on road maintenance costs. Then additional levies for disproportionate environmental costs and harm to vulnerable road users. Keep the overall tax amount the same but shift the burden so people with smaller vehicles pay substantially less than they do now. And then add strict liability for anything much larger than a kei car.

    • ephemeral_gibbon@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, however with that it’d be more expensive to administer taxation on bicycles etc. Than what they’d bring in… So not really worth doing at all.

      • TassieTosser@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Since the amount of damage caused by bikes to infrastructure would be small, the govt could just slap a tax for the cost to the purchase price of every bike. Not saying I’d agree with it but there are ways to make all road users pay their share.

        • itsmikeyd@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Surely human powered transport should have tax breaks in order to encourage adoption by promoting affordability though.