A girl who attends a school with classmates whose mothers work is more likely to be in the workforce when she has a child herself than a girl who grows up in local circles where most mothers stay at home, Cornell researchers have found.
“Role models pull girls in different directions in adolescence, a period when preferences are formed, when they decide what to do in their life,” said Eleonora Patacchini, the Stephen and Barbara Friedman Professor of Economics in the College of Arts and Sciences. “When they decide whether to return to work after having a child, they remember the mothers and fathers of their peers.”
Women trail men in the workforce largely because of the “child penalty” – women leaving work upon having a child and not returning. Social norms and culture influence a girls’ later decisions about participation in the work force; when she looked into precisely how, Patacchini, with doctoral student Giulia Olivero and Henrik Kleven, professor of economics at Princeton University, found that greater exposure to working moms at a very local level – the school – decreases the child penalty for girls. Meanwhile, exposure to working fathers increases the child penalty, a “striking” asymmetric effect, Patacchini said.
Girls who are socialized in an environment where most mothers work are more likely to develop a gender-role ideal that reconciles career and motherhood, they conjecture, compared with girls who are socialized in an environment where most mothers stay at home.
…
And fatherhood, is it lazyness?
No one has said that. But as you mention it, which kind of capitalism do you refer to? There are many forms of it,
I may suggest you read the study and then we discuss this.
Well done for doing the “why do you hate waffles” phenomenon. I thought I’d never see it in the wild. If you don’t know what that it it’s when someone says something and then someone extrapolates a completely new idea from it that the person may not even believe. Which in this case I don’t. Yes of course fatherhood is work too, but that isn’t what I nor the article is talking about, please stick to what was said and not what wasn’t said.
Also, I don’t believe in the concept of laziness, hopefully that can be remembered going forward.
It seems the article is, however, if it isn’t fair and to answer your question as far as I’m aware there aren’t many different types of capitalism, such a thing is usually brought up by people who have hope for capitalism which I don’t and don’t think is a good thing to hope for.
Sure, if it’s easy to access I will.