You’ve lost me! It’s how any chemical is used and in what quantities that’s important. For instance, we need carbon dioxide in the environment, that’s doesn’t mean that burning endless amounts of fossil fuels is a good idea. We need radiation, probably shouldn’t suck out heads on a nuclear reactor, we need water probably best not to swim out to sea in a storm.
For instance, we need carbon dioxide in the environment, that’s doesn’t mean that burning endless amounts of fossil fuels is a good idea.
It doesn't mean it's a bad idea either, there are positive effects from CO2 as well, up to a limit (1300 ppm for optimum plant growth, negative at 10,000 ppm for CO2 toxicity). Evaluating levels with that in mind, instead of the stance of "It's changing therefore its bad" is what is recommended.
1
u/vicmackey1981 22d ago
You’ve lost me! It’s how any chemical is used and in what quantities that’s important. For instance, we need carbon dioxide in the environment, that’s doesn’t mean that burning endless amounts of fossil fuels is a good idea. We need radiation, probably shouldn’t suck out heads on a nuclear reactor, we need water probably best not to swim out to sea in a storm.