Because it is a violation of your freedom and privacy.
A business should have the freedom to ask for proof, and people should have the right to refuse it, it works both ways. But any government service or nationalized business should provide their service to anyone regardless of what vaccinations they've had. You have rights as a person, and I don't think they can or should be altered unless you break the law.
What? You do know that schools and hospitals have required proof of vaccination for YEARS, right? It's not a violation of anything. It's a safety measure. You're fucking rights to privacy end the moment you put others in danger.
The US has been locking up people for user amounts of weed for half a century. Would you argue that the age of a measure is a good indicator of its quality?
If your only argument is "we've been doing it for years", then why are we not burning witches anymore?
In no context is marijuana use the same as vaccinations. Please use an argument that can't be torn apart by a 5th grader. Also, maybe try to read what I wrote before going off on some hyperbolic, lame tyraid that holds no value toward any argument.
Marijuana has nothing to do with the argument, just like the veracity of forcing vaccinations had nothing to do with your argument. Yours was solely about how long they've been in practice, and so was mine. I suggest you try and understand what an analogy is.
lol "The veracity of forcing vaccinations"? I know exactly what an analogy is. Yours was just bad. Like... really bad. My point WAS the vaccines, no matter how fucking much you want it not to be. You can't just go "fuck the subject, lets jerk off semantics til I win with my non-argument".
2
u/spays_marine Aug 08 '21
Being against forced vaccinations and passports has nothing to do with denying science.