Because it is a violation of your freedom and privacy.
A business should have the freedom to ask for proof, and people should have the right to refuse it, it works both ways. But any government service or nationalized business should provide their service to anyone regardless of what vaccinations they've had. You have rights as a person, and I don't think they can or should be altered unless you break the law.
You know that, in France, unvaccinated people can still access all the same things as the vaccinated, right? You can get the sanitary pass even if you're not vaccinated.
That aside, you're trying to make a distinction but that pass is still for people who are either vaccinated or recently tested. But the crux of the issue is not the vaccinations, it is a two tier society where one person can do something another can't.
That it seems like a good option to battle a pandemic is irrelevant, an internet filter for kiddy porn might seem like something you can't argue with either, unless you realize that it's just a foot in the door to strip people from their privacy. Which coincidentally is exactly what Apple decided this week, and what experts clearly recognize it as.
Many people just look at this instance in isolation and fail to see the bigger picture.
they have been doing it for decades, they managed for 18 months somehow and now they will be marginalized for not submitting to experimental treatment.
you know, you don’t need to polish the boots so hard, unless you are getting paid for it
9
u/Soyman_Bridges Aug 08 '21
Why should proof of vaccination be something which you are against?