r/business 20d ago

If software engineering is in demand, why is it so hard to get a software engineering job?

https://corgicorporation.medium.com/if-software-engineering-is-in-demand-why-is-it-so-hard-to-get-a-software-engineering-job-c043a964e463
394 Upvotes

194

u/Ranahub 20d ago

It's in demand but it's difficult to find good ones the ones who actually know what they are doing.

148

u/Market_Madness 20d ago

I blame a lot of this on the fact that very few places will hire entry level and train them right.

91

u/Postazure 20d ago

My experience is that my team, and the teams’ of everyone I know are always looking to hire engineers, but none of them are looking for entry level. Unfortunately no one seems to want to invest in entry level and I just don’t understand where they think experienced people are going to come from if so few companies are willing to invest in people.

18

u/WhatArghThose 20d ago

It took me over 20 years to finally dig my feet in and commit to learning how to program in JavaScript. After a year of practicing everyday, I can confidently say I'm probably only 50% fluent in the language after over 1000 hours.

My point is that training someone to become a real programmer takes a lot of effort when so many people, including myself, try and end up quitting several times before actually commiting for the long haul. The cost and turnover is probably too much for most companies.

14

u/taradiddletrope 20d ago

No offense but you’re still probably not 50% fluent.

Programming is one of those areas where making a breakthrough means you realize how much you still don’t know. LOL.

That’s because there is no finish line where you’ve learned everything.

You keep arriving at places you thought were the finish line and realize it was just another mile marker.

7

u/WhatArghThose 20d ago edited 20d ago

No offense taken! That estimation does not include the plethora of additional APIs and frameworks that are not apart of the basic structures and methods of JavaScript. I've reached the point where I'm learning concepts like algorithms, time/space complexity and the like that are components of programming in general now.

I've accepted that mastering programming means you're basically a lifetime student, because the languages are always evolving, and I kind of like that I can continue to learn new things everyday.

2

u/mycall 20d ago edited 20d ago

If you want play with virtualization inside browser, check this out and this

0

u/LittleLarryY 20d ago

I don’t know if this is the only or even the right answer. I don’t even know shit about computers really. I do know that this answer is not wrong though.

Source: I spent maybe ten hours learning JavaScript from a course I bought for pretty cheap.

48

u/Market_Madness 20d ago

Exactly, it’s a self inflicted problem

19

u/YeahNoDefinitely 20d ago

I work at a small startup, and we simply don’t have capacity to hire entry level. We need expertise to get off the ground, and we don’t have resources to level jr engineers up quickly.

It’s a bit of a catch 22. We can’t hire because we don’t have the expertise, and we can’t get expertise because we can’t hire.

34

u/[deleted] 20d ago edited 20d ago

[deleted]

8

u/slipperysliders 20d ago

Yeah but that requires being aware of the world around you and not wanting to be a “disruptive” aka “I don’t want to give a shit about the planet or the people on it I just want to do my thing fuck what you guys got going on”

8

u/spiris 20d ago

Most startups aren’t like that. Most startups solve a specific industry problem and have no intention of the general public ever knowing of their existence.

3

u/mycall 20d ago

oh but money talks. If they work for much less than your lowest "not jr" engineer, you might consider them an opportunity.

3

u/djabor 19d ago

i’ve had troubles hiring for specific fields and changed to hiring juniors/passionates and educated them to the desired skillset. we still had the position open during the training and it was faster (and cheaper) to train the junior than to wait for a niche senior that asked double the pay and came in with lists of demands.

all in all, it’s hard to convince recruiting to go this way, but for specific skills, doing a pilot will prove the value of training.

7

u/shady_mcgee 20d ago

Honest question, but why would you invest in an entry level person, spend a ton of your cycles and your teams cycles getting them up to competent, when they'll more that likely move on to a better paying job in a year or two?

I know the suggested answer is "Well, pay them more", but I can pay someone with XP more and get someone who can start producing today, and not 8 months from now.

0

u/mycall 20d ago

Because they are interning for free, for as long as they want.

2

u/thisdesignup 19d ago

From a business perspective it's not free if they don't know enough to do the job the way you want but have to be taught. Especially then if they leave when educated you're back at square one and got nothing in return.

3

u/m_e12 20d ago

Well... It is already hard to find a good senior programmer with a few short interviews, even if they have years of experience. I have worked with many senior programmer and yet their skill level is like day and night. Some people seem to never become a good engineer/programmer no matter how much time you invest in them.

And now imagine that you need to hire someone who has no experience but may become a good programer or not... So you may invest years and get nothing in return.

Especially if you are in a small company and you are already limited on budget and time, this may just not be worth it.

/edit: typo

0

u/andrewj61 20d ago

Teach yourself and come to a potential employer with a portfolio of software engineering problems you have solved.

1

u/poppin_puffs 20d ago

We have an internship pipeline - a lot of companies do actually

1

u/ArcticRiot 19d ago

This is all of engineering, as well. If the job needs actual engineering disciplines, they want junior or senior level engineers. If the job can accept entry level engineers, then the job duties have absolutely nothing to do with engineering, and the education is just a bonus over qualification.

16

u/LittleLight85 20d ago

Yep. You’re expected to train yourself without ever having any professional experience and enter the field with mid level skills. Lack of training is a huge problem in the modern workforce across many disciplines.

14

u/Frunk2 20d ago

They hire plenty of entry level it’s just all offshored. They are willing to pay a premium for the onshored experiences engineers instead of training them themselves and losing them to a different company

22

u/RandomlyMethodical 20d ago

I’ve worked for a couple companies that were willing to hire new college grads, but they never had the sense to give the good ones hefty raises the first couple years. Upper management would wonder why we couldn’t keep the younger engineers, and i always told them it was because these kids can get a 25-50% raise by going anywhere else after they get a year of experience.

I would try to give them 20% raises, but it never got approved because “we don’t give raises higher than 5%” or “we don’t want to cause unrealistic expectations for the future”.

2

u/turquoiseblues 20d ago

Cisco?

6

u/LittleLarryY 20d ago

Unfortunately this sounds far too common in far too many industries.

31

u/[deleted] 20d ago

Unlike a lot of professions, programming is something that can be self taught. Every strong programmer I know (e.g. people who now work at FAANG on highly performant products or write libraries that other devs are using) spent time outside of school/work on personal projects, taking an interest in the profession as a craft. Myself, I've spent 100s of hours outside of work/school playing with libraries and writing throwaway code.

To become a solid software engineer takes practice. There's a LOT of courses out there which are high quality, but just like writing, painting, or playing an instrument, a lot of it comes down to sitting on your own and iterating for hours. A number of good companies near me will take on entry level programmers, but even they will largely cherry pick the individuals who have expressed a true interest in programming. For example, a friend of mine had no experience coding Angular but knew Java like a pro, so a company with a rock solid engineering team took a flier him and let him train in Angular for weeks before committing code.

The benefit is a talented programmer can work for a stellar company without having attended MIT or Stanford. The drawback is that the onus is on the applicant to wow companies because of the number of applicants.

To end, codebases can be complex, so in a number of companies a true entry level programmer (i.e. little if any experience to coding) may not add much to the team considering the programmer may take a very long time before they're able to comprehend the code. And that persons code will likely need a lot of refactoring from more senior engineers. In that context, it's not a surprise why some companies would prefer to wait for the right candidate.

10

u/Market_Madness 20d ago

Of course learning outside is expected, but you can only do so much on your own. Just the general experience of working as a real software engineer is invaluable, but rarely offered to those with little experience.

5

u/proverbialbunny 20d ago

If you can finish a project that actually does something, so eg it might run in the background on a server or similar, then you're post jr software engineer level at that point. Doesn't matter if you've ever worked at a company or not. A junior needs hand holding, a standard software engineer can figure things out how to get things done on their own if they need to, similar to doing a personal project.

3

u/LittleLight85 20d ago

Every strong programmer I know (e.g. people who now work at FAANG on highly performant products or write libraries that other devs are using) spent time outside of school/work on personal projects

Yeah, out of necessity because that’s what you’re expected to do. If you don’t do that, you don’t get hired.

-2

u/slipperysliders 20d ago

Yeah and just like my side hobby as a jazz musician, I have to actually like jazz and practice, because if I don’t, I don’t get to sit on gigs! Who knew that’s how things worked!

4

u/LittleLight85 20d ago edited 20d ago

Jobs earn you a living. You don’t always have to be in love with what you do or do it for fun in your spare time. Expecting workers to train themselves for free in their own time benefits corporations in that they don’t have to invest in their workforce and people like you are convinced it makes you special. Oof.

“Entry level” exists for a reason and the software development industry likes to pretend it doesn’t exist at all.

5

u/slipperysliders 20d ago

No, me being the shit at everything I do makes me special. Y’all think you’re supposed to show up with the bare minimum and expect everything to be handed to you because you showed up, when it’s folks working much harder because they actually want to be good at it for the sake of it and they are going to eat your lunch in any economic system.

2

u/Jaboy75 20d ago

Thank you.

1

u/bashogaya 20d ago

Listen to yourself. If you are not in love with what you are applying for a job for. You are wasting everyone’s time including yours. And whether you like it or not, that is your competition. Your are going to have to prove yourself against programmers who are passionate about coding and do it for fun. And for a moment just put yourself in the employers shoes… if you receive 2 job applications- one loves the work and other just wants a paycheck. Who would you choose?

2

u/poopwithjelly 20d ago

When you find that janitor that is just brimming with love for mopping, or the dish washer that goes home and grinds out burnt pan food, you let me know. You do need to bring experience to the table, since this is a competition for a job, but you do not have to love it. There is a middle ground here.

1

u/bashogaya 20d ago

Okay I give up. You are absolutely correct. I wish you the best 👍🏽

0

u/spiris 20d ago

There’s a decline in efficiency after about 30 hours of work in a week. People who go home and program nights and weekends, even after reaching an advanced skill level, might be worse at their jobs than people who go home and watch Netflix, go rock climbing, and play with their dog at the beach.

Besides, there’s more to life than work. I don’t want to work with people who “live to code”. They’re likely to be insufferable, even if they’re better programmers. I wouldn’t hire people like that, because it’s not the culture I want to build.

1

u/information-zone 19d ago

The good engineers did it first/naturally & companies recognized that pattern. Not the other way around.

4

u/taradiddletrope 20d ago

I see way, way too many posts on Reddit mocking job postings for entry level programming jobs that require experience.

OMG, they’re asking for an entry level person that has 3 years of PHP experience! How can you get experience if you can’t get an entry level job?!?!

Uhm, maybe you work on it in your spare time? Maybe you contribute to some open source projects so you can build your CV.

I was a self taught person 30 years ago. I always hired self taught over fancy diploma. I’ve hired people with psychology degrees, music degrees, no degrees, etc.

Many companies will hire self taught programmers but you need to show imitative and some passion for programming.

All too often people just do these boot camps snd expect six-figure offers and complain about how nobody will hire them.

Learning to program and being a programmer are two entirely different things.

1

u/BarStoolPreacher117 20d ago

What languages would you suggest to people who are interested in programming this day and age?

14

u/proverbialbunny 20d ago

Programming languages are like tools. It's like asking, "Do you recommend a hammer or a saw for building a house?" The answer is, "Yes"

Find what you want to build, then go backwards and find a tool that is probably going to be best for that job, then learn that language.

4

u/sanman 20d ago

People don't just apply for job - they apply for jobs - which means they want to have the skills that are mostly like to get them a job, or some job, out of the many they've applied to. So they want to know what's most in demand.

2

u/Haster 20d ago

Sure, use the right tool for the right job. But if someone asks me what tools they should get to do woodworking it wouldn't be out of line to suggest going to pickup a hammer and a saw.

1

u/proverbialbunny 20d ago

That's why I said

The answer is, "Yes"

1

u/BarStoolPreacher117 20d ago

Perfect, thanks!

1

u/kohis 20d ago

Current FAANG, offers from 4/5 previously.

Every strong programmer I know (e.g. people who now work at FAANG on highly performant products or write libraries that other devs are using) spent time outside of school/work on personal projects, taking an interest in the profession as a craft.

I did spend a solid amount of conscious time over two years on my craft, and this culminated in getting well placed in FAANG.

Since FAANG, hardly work on personal stuff. Fwiw I find my work is challenging and engaging enough that I feel I'm learning a sufficient amount for my desired growth rate and life plans and priorities.

3

u/hagy 20d ago

The open secret to getting a strong entry level role is getting 2-3 summer internships while in college. I say that as a software engineer and former hiring manager. If you can intern at two different firms, and perform well, then you're guaranteed at least two job offers. Even internships outside of tier-one (i.e., FAANG) corps are still valuable. They provide some experience on your resume and the start of a professional network.

It's no secret that tech firms only have intern programs to juice their junior recruitment pipelines. These temporary roles barely justify their salaries, which can be high as $8000/month for firms like Facebook. And the onboarding and mentorship costs incurred by taking time away from engineers likely exceeds the intern wages and benefits.

Even if you don’t want to accept a role with a firm that you interned with, still respond to the hiring manager's job offer email and explain how you appreciated your internship but are now looking for something different. Provide a concise description of what you are looking for. The hiring manager likely has plenty of friends and colleagues at different firms who may have an appropriate role and if you’re not joining their team, the manager would rather see you land well at a firm in their network.

And remember, it’s all about getting two years experience at almost anywhere. After that, you can always trade up to more reputable firms with higher compensation. You just need the two years experience to get your resume past the recruiter screening.

3

u/AgentScreech 20d ago

If you aren't in college and self taught, how do you get the internships?

2

u/Market_Madness 20d ago

Of course the ones who get multiple internships will succeed, however that’s a pretty small minority. I just feel like there has to be a way to make training someone with the degree but little experience worth it.

2

u/DrLeoMarvin 20d ago

I tried that recently and it’s a huge gamble that they actually train well and become a productive team member. Gave one person over six months and they just never seemed to get anything and constantly having to show them process over and over

3

u/heydrun 20d ago

Second this. Training people is a big gamble and depending on time and budget constraints you might not have thst luxury.

To me, the tell is always if a person is eager to get into new stuff or rather reluctant when it comes to changes.

I‘ve had great beginners who grew amazingly fast and I‘ve seen people dragged behind barely holding on.

5

u/DrLeoMarvin 20d ago

Been trying to fill a few positions for nearly a year now. Mid to senior positions, Wordpress developers. The good ones are all taken and the ones we have been interviewing just don’t have the chops

3

u/AgentScreech 20d ago

Been trying to fill a few positions for nearly a year now.

If you hired a novice, but someone willing to learn, how long would it take for your existing team to get them to the mid level you want? I'd guess less than a year.

You want good talent? Pay a ton or train them yourselves

2

u/DrLeoMarvin 20d ago

A year invested in hopefully building a productive team member? That’s ludicrous

6

u/AgentScreech 20d ago edited 20d ago

Well, i think we've identified your issue.

Keep complaining that you can't find anyone, while it would be faster to train them yourself.

3

u/isubird33 20d ago

Yeah, I mean that's not crazy. In my field (not tech), you're looking at someone taking at least 4-6 months before they're even somewhat competent and probably a year before they're up to speed with the rest of the team.

8

u/revonrat 20d ago

To get good developers, you have to offer good work. Wordpress development is not, generally speaking, considered good work.

My advice would be to hire junior developers and train. Expect the trained developers to leave on a regular basis and always have a group of up and coming developers that can step in.

-1

u/DrLeoMarvin 20d ago

That’s just not true. We use OOP, dependency injection, composer, complex AWS stacks and more. WordPress is just a library basically and we use it’s filtering and CMS capabilities to build a headless editorial system with a react front end. WordPress can be a cheap site full of plugins or a utility for scaling high end development.

5

u/revonrat 20d ago

While I'm sure that you're following sound development practices, it doesn't matter.

If a developer has the opportunity to work on AWS, Azure, Facebook, a startup, etc or work on Wordpress, the developer will overwhelmingly pick the "not Wordpress" opportunity.

That's what you're up against.

-6

u/DrLeoMarvin 20d ago edited 20d ago

That’s a very arrogant point of view. Senior Wordpress devs are in high demand with excellent salaries and benefits, fully remote. You obviously don’t know what you are talking about. I work for healthline.com as the lead engineer over the CMS (Wordpress). We are a top 200 site globally. Also medical news today, healthgrades and more. We support thousands of editors, writers, med reviewers and so on who use the system every day to create content. It’s not easy and is super challenging and fun:

We have engineers who left Google and Amazon because of the stress level or high demand needs of their teams where we are a bit slower paced but do kick ass work.

3

u/MrGoth 20d ago

You might not like it but he's right. The perception amongst people who can pick and choose amongst programming jobs is that WordPress is not the sort of job you want to pick or choose.

1

u/DrLeoMarvin 19d ago

Eh it’s a Reddit bias. I’ve been in the industry long enough to know and it doesn’t matter what I like. Reddit hates php and Wordpress.

1

u/Olibri 19d ago

You know who spends a lot of time on Reddit? Engineers. I’m sure Wordpress is awesome, but schools aren’t going to push it unless FANG starts needing it and pays high salaries for it.

2

u/revonrat 19d ago

I really didn't want this to turn in to a pissing contest. The advice still stands. Hire developers early in their career instead and mentor them into senior developers. Expect them to leave, so keep developing a bench of junior developers.

I worked for a company like that thirty-some years ago and those experiences were formative. I'll leave out specifics on who I am, who I work for now, my title, etc. because revealing that information is likely to only cause trouble and contribute to the pissing contest. However, I am where I am currently because of some of the early mentoring I received in a company similar to yours. I think of the people who provided that mentoring often. Some of them are dead now. But I still hold those memories near and dear. When I think of those people, it motivates me to try to help folks earlier in their careers than I.

In return, that company got one of the top engineers to ever walk through their door. I didn't start that way but they got me there. For that I will always be grateful, but they also got a lot of really good work out of me.

One last bit of advice, delete the information in the above that identifies your employer. There's no upside to revealing it, but doing so can cause you grief.

3

u/krewekomedi 20d ago

It took a few years to convince our management to hire junior engineers and we are very picky about the ones we hire.

2

u/rare_pig 20d ago

This is every job

73

u/bashogaya 20d ago

Allow me to over-simplify things a bit. Software engineering learning curve is not linear. It is very easy to go from zero to writing basics code. But to make that code easily scalable, reliable and highly responsive is where it’s at. And anyone who is willing to dedicate enough time to learn the above will never ever be without a high paying job.

30

u/bakraofwallstreet 20d ago

Yup. I sometimes write python scripts for work that make my coworkers (who don't know anything about programming) feel like I some kind of a real programmer.

While in reality, any professional programmer would look at my code and probably either laugh or get mad.

5

u/pibbsworth 20d ago

Similar story here. After a few years since off I once got a job that involved writing a lot of plsql. The team (of people doing the same job as me) I went into thought i was some sort of magician, but in reality I’d forgotten most of what i used to know and had to re-learn the basics from the latest oreilly book at the time. It gave me major imposter syndrome

10

u/bobzibub 20d ago

Maybe not. You probably put in the appropriate amount of time and energy in order to get the job done.

12

u/bakraofwallstreet 20d ago

I do work hard at creating those scripts but the more I learn about programming, the more I realize how much of a beginner I am (and the time/effort that would be required for me to skill up). I also tell my coworkers they need to hire a real program if any of the scripts were needed for something the company actually relies on instead of just saving time for us on trivial tasks because I obviously can't write production level code.

7

u/bashogaya 20d ago

Sounds like your brain is ripe to delve deeper into the subjects of system design, security and reliability.

5

u/solarmist 20d ago

Yup. The easy part of programming is writing the code and getting it to work. The hard part is being confident that if you hand it off to someone else it will still work. Handling edge cases, errors, and all the weird ways people want to use your code is hard.

1

u/Keyspam102 19d ago

Yea I wrote a script at my old agency once to do some batch processing of files and people thought I was some sort of computer genius. Like no, I just googled a few lines and fiddled for 2 minutes to get it to work. I cant code at all and couldnt program anything. But anyway it ended up that every computer question would come to me which sucked (and every question could be easily answered by google..) and why now I dont suggest things to people at my new agency.

3

u/dregan 20d ago

I really feel like testable and maintainable should be on that list.

20

u/jjmac 20d ago

That hashmap example made me viscerally ill. Then to go on about arrays. For that example. And storing counts. That example screams why it's so hard for some people to get SWE jobs.

13

u/raptormeat 20d ago

The blind leading the blind.

5

u/shar_vara 20d ago

This is SO MUCH of the software world. Most people don’t know how to produce halfway decent outcomes. Probably myself included, but at least I’m at the step where I know I’m not a genius lol.

2

u/Echo1525 16d ago

Right, I'm not sure how a hashmap could be used. The point of the story was that it was a bad use of hashmaps. The sentence after, about counts, was just supposed to be about where hashmaps COULD be used. This should have been written about in more detail, though.

Of all the critical comments I received for writing this, I'm surprised I did not see more like this one on the Medium page. The story was embarrassing, but the most angry comment I got was for writing "you can be a backend engineer who works very closely with hardware," which is wrong. You cannot be a backend engineer who works very closely with hardware. You can write code that works very closely with hardware, but that's not backend.

What you wrote about is absolutely a legitimate criticism.

I did not expect this to get nearly as popular as it did. In hindsight, I would have provided a more detailed example, not made the backend mistake, and maybe taken out the "Corgi Corporation" stuff.

1

u/jjmac 16d ago

Yeah, that was unclear at best - but props for posting it

1

u/neoform 20d ago

I’m not even sure how a hash map could be used in that example since I assume letters can be repeated throughout the string and you can’t just sum them all together… a4b2a6 should turn up as a10b2…

2

u/AgentScreech 20d ago

I think they were saying it's a bad use of one.

1

u/rramdin 20d ago

If it's just the letters a-z and A-Z, that's only 52 values which would fit in 6 bits; you could use 2 more bits to count up to 4 occurrences. That would invariably produce shorter "compressed" strings.

1

u/neoform 20d ago

It wasn’t clear that the test was about being as memory efficient as possible.

1

u/jjmac 19d ago

You would hash "a1" and "a2" and put the counts there. Bonus points for using a second hash map to count the number of a's, b's, etc. To maintain the final order add a linked list.

1

u/neoform 19d ago

I can’t remember the last time a linked list was necessary over a vector or whatever in your language of choice… linked lists aren’t particularly efficient vs continuous memory.

1

u/jjmac 19d ago

I don't know if I can conceive a worse implementation. Maybe if I spent more time on it.....

16

u/areopagitic 20d ago

It's simple, there is a supply / demand mismatch.

There are way too many software engineers for entry level or junior roles. This is why there is a perception that software jobs are so hard to get.

There are far too few software engineers for advanced roles. Companies sometimes have openings for months trying to get a "Senior XX Engineer" simply because there are so few people with that skill set.

4

u/[deleted] 20d ago

[deleted]

5

u/heydrun 20d ago

Private / open source projects can be a good way to showcase skill. The biggest problem I see in most beginners is not neccessarily the skillset but how well they work with others in a team and the degree of independence when it comes to tasks (i.e. do I have to give every single step or do they know the steps and ask about stuff I missed).

1

u/Mick0331 17d ago edited 17d ago

This industry is so predatory that it relies on you yielding to exploitation to get a job. I always laugh when I see companies that refuse to hire entry level employees because of budget, but have insanely expensive offices filled with even more expensive art and furniture. It's not the budget, they exploit people because they want to exploit people. The cupboards aren't bare, they're just sociopaths that only pay people who can leave.

4

u/Josuah 20d ago

Get your foot in the door with a less advanced role.

There are lots of companies (where I am in the San Francisco Bay Area) that are hiring software developers without significant experience, like recent graduates. But those companies are still going to be looking for the best of that bunch.

7

u/Amyndris 20d ago

Generally through internships. It allows the company to "try before you buy". My last company (F500) also partnered with a local college to design a curriculum around the tools and technology they used and those students were slam dunks to get summer internships that oftentimes resulted in fulltime return offers.

7

u/revonrat 20d ago

"try before you buy"

For those who are just starting out, this does not mean unpaid. You should always be paid for your work. Internships included.

3

u/Amyndris 20d ago

Yes, internships at most large tech firms are paid. Usually around ~6-8k a month in the bay area.

1

u/AgentScreech 20d ago

And how do you get internships if you are self taught?

1

u/Amyndris 20d ago

It's a lot more difficult and some large companies don't have entry level roles outside of their University Recruiting path.

Your best bet is either to build experience at a small company or a startup.

8

u/skilliard7 20d ago

Entry level has massive supply of people trying to get into the field because the media told them its an easy way to get rich quick. Supply is much larger than demand.

What there is a shortage of is experienced developers that can actually do their job well.

7

u/tshirtguy2000 20d ago

They wanted experienced ones not the glut of Johnny come lately.

69

u/superanth 20d ago

It doesn’t help when they put on resumes that they want someone with 8 years of experience with a programming language that was invented 3 years earlier.

28

u/LJ_is_best_J 20d ago

My take: shit like that sometimes is to bet against people that don’t know that. You having experience with a 3 year old program would quickly be identified if you point that out in hiring process

But who knows what HR is really thinking lol

52

u/SidTheSperm 20d ago

I’m an engineer (but mechanical, not software), and in my experience it’s mostly:

Hiring manager tells HR they want someone with experience in “xyz”. HR sees it’s a mid-level position, so they post the job app wanting 8 years of experience in “xyz” without knowing anything about “xyz”. It’s an issue of HR being good at HR things, the engineers being good at engineer things, and the two parties not working together effectively.

14

u/LJ_is_best_J 20d ago

That makes a lot of sense

Long way of saying poor communication lol. I know my organization doesn’t do this but work role postings should be reviewed by people in the role to confirm or deny required skills

2

u/SidTheSperm 20d ago

Yeah basically just poor communication lol, just figured I’d explain where/how the miscommunication occurs.

9

u/mediaman2 20d ago

This is exactly it. These things are rarely con-jobs.

HR just doesn't always understand the terminology, and the engineer may agree that "8 years" experience is reasonable (thinking "total developer experience"), but HR thinks they mean 8 years in a particular language, and the mixup gets baked into the job ad.

HR is then trained to look for certain keywords but doesn't understand what they're looking at. Which is also why those automated keyword systems are getting widespread use, because that's basically what HR does anyway.

2

u/ladeedah1988 20d ago

Exactly, certain levels like expert, advanced, etc. have the year experience automatically in the description. At least for me, as a hiring manager, I generally ignore years experience and look at actual skills.

1

u/WayneKrane 20d ago

So much this. HR and managers need to work together to get better candidates.

1

u/EaterOfFood 20d ago

Wouldn’t the hiring manager review the posting before it goes live?

1

u/SidTheSperm 20d ago

Should? Yes

Does? Not often

6

u/Miketequilacoffe 20d ago

As a Part time SEO I feel it, with covid and everyone online they want some one to make traffic with 5 years experience, when in my country 5 years ago, not every company got a ducking page to make SEO possible.

2

u/Ripberger7 20d ago

People may debate me on this, but there seems to be “entry level jobs” which require less than 5 years of experience, followed by jobs which require some working knowledge, which will usually say 5+ years of experience. The number of years you’ve been doing something doesn’t matter quite as much as actually knowing your subject.

The 5 years thing is more of a way of saying “you will not get trained in this position, so if you don’t know what you’re doing you’ll be let go quick”. So that said, I would not hesitate to apply for those 5 year jobs if you feel at all confident about your ability to either perform or learn quickly.

1

u/rickrat 20d ago

Talking about something and coding it are two different things. When I was interviewing devs, 20+ year developers couldn’t create an empty project in visual studio.

Anyone with any experience that can code are the ones I will hire.

1

u/Starfish_Symphony 19d ago

This seems the correct perspective. Unfortunately way too many people claim eight years experience, have an advanced degree from an unverifiable school and dubious communication skills-yet corporate keeps hiring these losers because H1b

1

u/skilliard7 20d ago

It doesn’t help when they put on resumes that they want someone with 8 years of experience with a programming language that was invented 3 years earlier.

usually that means they want 8 years of experience in software development, 3 of which were in the technology. Or sometimes, 8 years in its predecessor.

6

u/noodlez 20d ago

It isn't. It's hard to get a top paying SWE job.

31

u/Fuzzylogic1977 20d ago

Because it’s a hard job, and good companies are particular about who they hire. I got a software engineering degree at a great university but some of my cohort were absolute rubbish and cheating was rife. I was working full time as a software engineer before I even finished my degree. Some of my alumni, as expected, never got jobs.

12

u/ZestySaltShaker 20d ago

Some people can’t debug. I expect you’re the type of person that can solve problems when faced with a challenge. I also expect that those other alumni weren’t good at solving problems, and that comes out during the interview, what the interview is for, actually.

6

u/MarisOtterBelly 20d ago

I’m 90% certain the reason why my amateur ass has been employed for so long is that I have a natural instinct for figuring out why shit’s broken.

…probably because I spent so long making the same mistakes.

2

u/ZestySaltShaker 20d ago

Lol. You would be surprised the number of folks who don’t learn from their mistakes.

2

u/shar_vara 20d ago

I’ve never thought about this angle, but you can’t memorize your way through debugging or even writing code. Makes sense why sometimes the people in school don’t always do as well in the job market, and why my dumbass who sucked at school is at least halfway competent.

5

u/RecoveringGrocer 20d ago

In my personal experience, landing a good engineering job requires the technical skill to get through the whiteboarding, good communication skills to interview well, and networking/knowing someone at the company. Lots of people have one or two of these, but it often isn’t enough.

Of the three requirements, I’d argue that whiteboarding is actually the easiest to accomplish and prepare for if you have some basic programming knowledge already. Learning to communicate effectively and build relationships with people takes years if you aren’t a very extroverted person.

I landed my current job because I worked well and got along with a colleague a couple of years ago, and he remembered that. I had no idea at the time that he would play such a critical role in my career.

3

u/baller5 20d ago

People don’t understand how important soft skills are for software engineers

6

u/gc3 20d ago

Why do you need a hash map to im implement that 'compression' algoritm?

All you need are two pointers a char, and an int

2

u/Josuah 20d ago

You don't. The author was using that as an example of how he completely messed up an interview in the past. The bullet point above and the paragraph below the quoted interaction explains this.

It would have been clearer if it was broken out into its own section, since the other portions of that section of text ("The Coding Interview") are more or less standalone statements. And it's not entirely clear why some of them are bullet points and some of them are paragraphs.

5

u/SwagChemist 20d ago

Need experience to work an entry level job, can’t get experience without entry level, and the cycle continues.

6

u/grapegeek 20d ago

Because everyone wants a senior dev with a decade of experience. Nobody wants entry level and don’t want to take the time to get them up to speed. In ye olden days companies used to bring on junior people and train them. Now they don’t want to wait. They are too impatient

2

u/MoonBatsRule 20d ago

There are two reasons for this, I think.

1) Companies are running lean and mean. They try to have exactly enough employees that they need. This means hiring someone with no actual experience takes one of their existing employees and makes him into a tutor or trainer. That new hire reduces overall capacity, initially, perhaps for a year.

2) Most people currently employed at a company have not worked there since college; they know that someone new is going to do a job hop sooner, rather than later. That new college kid is probably going to jump within 5 years.

Taking those things together, a company has to be almost altruistic to hire someone right out of college; they're going to educate someone for another company.

6

u/PrasadBY 20d ago

Always a challenge to get right fit. We interview sometimes close to 100-200 software engineers to be able to hire one. Not like we are expecting some great developers. Even to get a decent developer, we have to go through many fake resumes or lying about experience or claim that they know something when they clearly would not know the basics of it. If anyone truly learns programming regardless of technology and is able to sufficiently demonstrate their skill set, then they can get a job for sure when there is such high demand.

5

u/Blueasman 20d ago

Right fit is a code for hiring on the basis of ‘be like me’ syndrome.

2

u/jimbolauski 20d ago

It's really not. Certain traits work better for certain jobs.

If you need a dev that is going to be out on field tests there are certain qualities that make them more valuable. Being very organized and methodical is a huge plus.

If you need a dev for hardware integration you're going to want to look for someone that you can throw a manual at and they retain all the little details.

1

u/PrasadBY 20d ago edited 20d ago

Not really. That syndrome is only seen in amateur interviewers. The right fit is are you ready to take the person in your team and be responsible for their work. Will they make a positive change in the team or will they suck your energy and time in additional training etc.

3

u/[deleted] 20d ago

[deleted]

1

u/PrasadBY 20d ago

You will be surprised to know that it is for 1 skill and it is mind blowing how much people can lie on their resume. Mostly such interviews are short. Just to let you know the aim of the interview is not to reject somebody but to hire somebody decent who know at-least half of what they claim they know on their resume.

1

u/[deleted] 20d ago

[deleted]

1

u/PrasadBY 20d ago

Pick anything from front end, back end, mainframes, ML/AI, Java, C, C++, C#, Salesforce, Pega, Azure, React, iOS, android etc. The list is endless. Pick anything. There is always demand for IT jobs all over the world.

3

u/[deleted] 20d ago edited 20d ago

[deleted]

1

u/PrasadBY 19d ago

Lol. This is funny. Going by you, having no skill set is better than having at least one skill set. Why don’t we have this too. You put up on your resume that you are a doctor, then Hospital interviews you to realise that you are not an actual doctor, but a doctor on resume. Then you want them to still hire you and train you to be a doctor or surgeon?

So if someone is claiming that they are a chef and applying for that position and don’t know how to turn on stove, you still want them to be hired and trained? Hilarious!!

Will you get treated by so called doctor or actual doctor or eat from so called chef or actual chef?

There are college grads who get hired based on their education and who are trained in particular technology. Why on earth will any company train a employee from scratch paying them salary of an experienced person so that they can leave the company once trained for better pay. Charity??

1

u/[deleted] 19d ago edited 19d ago

[deleted]

→ More replies

4

u/pbgswd 20d ago

Companies and recruiters expect the candidate to have many years exp in exactly their stack and technology and industry, never want to lift a finger to train, expect it all, etc. Recruiters assert their value in the chain by making a show of rejecting as many people as possible. Why, why, why to all of this? Money, and a cynical, corrupt process.

4

u/Playful-Natural-4626 20d ago

The contractor model has everything to do with this.

1

u/sizl 20d ago

Explain, please

3

u/Playful-Natural-4626 20d ago edited 19d ago

Let say Company X works mostly on government contracts. Their mean required employees over 5 years is 1,000 software engineers.

However, to save money they do not employ 1,000 SE they use contract labor through a service that renews every 3-6 months. Those SE are hired through the labor contracting company at less pay ( think temp services) and no benefits. Thusly, as this employment model becomes the norm mostly lower paid, temp jobs are the only ones available.

This could be balanced by SE demanding better pay, direct employment, benefits, ect.

However, both the direct companies and the labor company often then start outsourcing these contracts to non-citizens.

Moreover, with the labor market for SE being artificially suppressed they are often living job to job in 3-6 month increments and only receiving 30 days of notice if their contracts will be renewed. Thus, causing a false sense of desperation for SEs looking for their next paycheck.

This is something I see with engineering jobs of all spectrums, and it’s a growing trend in most labor markets.

2

u/Vast_Cricket 20d ago

right kind of experience counts.

2

u/michaelb1 20d ago

Is it hard to get a SWE job though?

2

u/sizl 20d ago

For newbs with a bootcamp certificate, probably

1

u/michaelb1 19d ago

My son graduated from a pretty decent state college last year CompSci, BS. He applied for like 3 jobs and ended up taking a $100k starting salary at a big healthcare software company in Madison WI.

I had been telling him how getting a job is a long and tedious process and be prepared for lots of frustration and low wage. He proved me very wrong.

1

u/sizl 19d ago

He must be charming. The fact is regardless of industry, likeable people get jobs very easily

1

u/michaelb1 19d ago

I mean he is personable and likable but they did put him through the ringer in the hiring process. He had to take live coding exams, go through several rounds of interviews. It seemed like a real pain in the ass but its justified in the end I suppose.

2

u/productboffin 20d ago

As someone who works in software development, we can’t hire fast enough… .Net/PHP, backend, frontend.

Multiple recruiters, posts on LinkedIn, personal references - seats have been hard to fill (skill set, competitive pay, benefits, etc)

Software development is the 2nd highest in demand for career (not sure of source) so not surprising to see the level of Uber-competitiveness affecting both applicant and hiring manager…

2

u/Trader2KG 20d ago

It's the same thing it's always been, lack experience

2

u/aytoozee1 20d ago

It’s not

2

u/mycall 20d ago

My favorite interview question is more of a show-and-tell. I ask for new software utilities, they use, in which I have never heard of and could use. I let them wow me.

1

u/sizl 20d ago

I’m borrowing this.

2

u/solarmist 20d ago

The other thing is that interviewing is a crap shoot. Even for great engineers.

Don’t remember how to solve this problem off the cuff? Don’t know dynamic programming like the back of your hand because you’ve never used outside a class room? Or my favorite “Oops, it took me 10 minutes to work out the right approach and I would’ve solved it in another 10 minutes, but time ran out.” Weren’t able to verbally debug your code after you wrote it on the fly? Missed a rare edge case?

Any of these happen to you and you have at least a 50% chance of getting a No hire on that module. And 1 No hire is enough to sink most interviews unless you hit at least one out of the park.

3

u/ahfoo 20d ago

Key point: You were lied to:

https://www.bls.gov/ooh/computer-and-information-technology/computer-programmers.htm

If you read the information from the Bureau of Labor Statistics they suggest that there are not really that many programming jobs to begin with and the employment prospects are set to decline by about ten percent in the coming years.

The STEM lies were spread to try to put the onus on the little guy. Your life sucked because you didn't study math etc. Believing the lies was your mistake.

2

u/Agile-Salamander-812 19d ago

Computer programmers not so much but on the same source you’ve linked to software developers are high growth

0

u/ahfoo 19d ago

Yeah, they break it into many categories which makes it confusing because you have to know specifically what their categories include but also look at the total numbers of employed and ask yourself what percentage of the population this number represents. STEM has been massively oversold as an employment solution. Again, this is because it makes it convenient to blame the citizens and claim that the lack of virtue (math skills) is the reason they can't make money. This justifies the status quo. The poor deserve their poverty because they are lazy while the wealthy are talented and skilled.

1

u/mazzicc 20d ago edited 20d ago

Because it’s cheaper to higher engineers in Eastern Europe and Asia?

Edit: hire. I’m awake, I swear.

4

u/UK-sHaDoW 20d ago

Its because they weigh less over there.

1

u/nowrongturns 20d ago

It’s particularly in demand because it’s a hard job. It’s hard to find ppl with the right skills etc. what companies want are good engineers because a bad one is a net negative. So what do they do? They have hard interviews that screen out most ppl and therefore there is still an over supply of jobs.

1

u/thorpeedo22 20d ago

How realistic is it if I were to jump into a 3month boot camp for python and get a decent job from it? I have years of sales experience in IT, but no technical experience.

1

u/forestcall 20d ago

The issue is deeper than you think. When you have been coding for many years you become comfortable with the development process. Mixing extreme coding, scrum and using various subversion tools as well as git are all things that add to the skill base that managers look for even if they don’t realize.

1

u/AgentScreech 20d ago

I did it, so did my wife. We now make 4x what we used to. It can be done.

It's a combination of coding and connections.

If the bootcamp just says, here is python, let's make some projects and build a portfolio, "now you are all set, go get that job!". That's not really going to work

If you go through a bootcamp that has connections with the local companies that are friendly to hiring junior devs, then you will have a much higher success rate. But these are either much rarer or harder to get in to.

If you have a buddy that can mentor and advocate for you as you learn, do practice interviews, that's a huge help. You still need to get in front of hiring managers to get the interview.

Interviewing is it's own skill set. It takes equal amount of practice. You could bomb several before you nail one.

If you are an under representated minority, check out www.adadevelopersacademy.org They are basically the best bootcamp out there and it's free if you get accepted. They recently got a $10M grant to expand their campuses. ATL, NYC, Austin, and others are coming.

1

u/debaasmeister 20d ago

Also they are needed in one place of the world, the supply is on the other side.

1

u/dregan 20d ago

I just found out the other day that you can get a PE in Software Engineering. I bet there's like three people that have that credential.

1

u/Cormagnon 20d ago

Can't afford to train, duh

1

u/graham0025 19d ago

good software engineers are in demand

1

u/tooluckyformyowngood 19d ago

Because its the first choice of anyone with the slightest disability and one of the top pics for game lovers. Its not a physically demanding job either so if you can do it for some time, youll be good for a long time. Pick up a trade kiddos

1

u/cholula_is_good 19d ago

It’s an industry where quality of employee makes an enormous difference. Many executives believe in the 10x principle, meaning your best dev is ten times more effective than your average dev. Although there is high demand for more engineers, all companies are fighting over only the best candidates.

-20

u/Albedo_Argyle 20d ago

I dropped out of my cs science class with a few other students and we made our own coding company I thought college was for that lmao you guys actually stayed and got your degrees?

14

u/jgilbs 20d ago

o they post the job app wanting 8 years of experience in “xyz” without knowing anything about “xyz”. It’s an issue of HR being good at HR things, the engineers being good at engineer things, and the two parties not working together effectively.

Ahh yes, the lucrative "coding company" industry. Must be very profitable.

6

u/Odinonline 20d ago

Are you trolling? You literally posted 2 days ago about having to do homework

1

u/sizl 20d ago

He’s setting up Wordpress for his moms friends MLM