r/technicallythetruth • u/Sanskari_Balak • 9d ago
I chose option C wonder why 🤔 my marks got deducted
227
u/RevoltingRobin 9d ago
Canibalism can fix both overpopulation and food shortage at the same time
50
u/ramraj1996 9d ago
That will be a wrong turn to correct destination
13
6
u/Dabfamily 9d ago
It's better than a mass killing just to stop overpopulation it's an obvious choice 2 birds one stone
→ More replies4
505
u/BionicVnB 9d ago edited 8d ago
Yes. It's literally the best option. I don't understand.
EDIT: wtf 500 upvotes
220
u/VanFkingHalen 9d ago
This was a quiz for an ethics class.
77
34
27
u/AlexanderTox 9d ago
Shit question for an ethics class. Should be an option E for “it depends on which philosophical framework you are working from”
8
1
→ More replies1
47
u/CaptnSp00ky 9d ago
Historically it’s worked much better than any other option. Really depends what you’re defining “best” as.
5
u/BionicVnB 9d ago
Yes. Of course. We should be able to do it again
4
u/SlatoleP1 9d ago
Just avoid gas this time there’s better ways, put them on a spaceship and sent it to the sun.
→ More replies1
2
→ More replies3
u/Zerogrinder 9d ago
Education has worked the best by far. Short term you might reduce population by killing people, but family planning actually decreases unsustainable populations.
→ More replies12
u/TheReverseShock 9d ago
With some poor infrastructure planning you can kill way more people than any kill squad. And you can avoid any UN sanctions. Might even get foreign aid which you can misspurpose.
2
0
→ More replies1
u/w00timan 9d ago
The most effective way, but not the "best".
"The best way to decrease a population", not "best at".
Best being "most favourable" in the context rather than "most effective".
I think...
55
u/tk421yrntuaturpost 9d ago
What class are you taking that is teaching you to decrease the population?
50
u/Sanskari_Balak 9d ago
We were studying study related to reproductive health and stuff how to decrease the pace of population growth
6
u/jklarbalesss 9d ago
i learned about it in an environmental policy class. You’d be surprised how effective affluence and education are at stabilizing things. And yeah the china ones fucked but it’s more of a long game thing.
32
27
15
u/bigcockyboy6969 9d ago
to me its the only one that makes sense
7
u/Locke_Nessus 9d ago
Education and family planning make sense as well. It’s been proven that with higher standards of education people don’t want to have as many kids. It seems counterintuitive, but it’s not. Poorer families need more children to work for them and make more money. Proof of this is Japan, as it has many older people but few younger. As for family planning, higher access to family planning means less overall births because children are less likely to die. Children have higher rates of death in Africa and there are less contraceptives to prevent births.
2
u/F1reLi0n 9d ago
Not only that they dont want kids but have them later in the life as the education takes time and almost nobody wants to have kids while still in school. People are going to college until 30, that is already past prime for women to give birth. In poorer countries, women start having kids at 16 so they have more time to have a lot of kids.
3
57
8
u/Sacktchy 9d ago
One of the best ways is to release a plague and tell the population to wear masks. Most of them will probably refuse to wear a mask just because you told them, to thus killing them off. Easy peasy lemon squeezy
5
5
u/DreamBig_UIC22 9d ago edited 8d ago
They didn’t say describe the most ethical way
The best way is the most efficient right?
4
8
u/Enkaybee 9d ago
Only C will actually decrease the population. The others simply reduce it's growth rate generally.
2
3
3
u/TheOriginalMagoogly 9d ago
I read the answers as one sentence, and it sounds like the cunning plan of an evil genius.
3
3
7
u/thefuzzylogic 9d ago
There is no correct answer; I suspect this is a personality test question rather than an academic exam. All four of the responses would result in a population reduction, either directly or indirectly.
Which one is "best" depends on the criteria being used to judge it.
A is probably the best for the long term, and would have the greatest net positive effect on the remaining population.
B would be probably be the least effective and most expensive, because you would have to house the existing population.
C is the most direct and quickest way to achieve a population reduction, if you don't care about morality or human rights.
D is only marginally better than C, because it's a direct approach that doesn't murder anyone but does massively infringe on their human rights.
So yeah "best" isn't really the right way to phrase the question unless you're actually testing someone for sociopathy.
2
u/borlaughero 9d ago
Education and fertility rates correlate but one doesn't cause the other. That is because there is another factor that drives them both. People don't have large families because they are uneducated and knowledge transfer doen't make one stop having lots of kids.
Urbanization is what lowers the fertility rates most effectively. In that sense the single greatest driver of lowering fertility rates is globalization or free trade. This is what spurs urbanization most, and urbanization is what makes people have less kids. In that sense education is one of the factor of reducing fertility rates, but because of its costs to the parents not because they transfer knowledge. Woman empowerment and inclusion in the work force is the main factor. They happen in urban environment not rural.
if you don't care about morality
Depends on morality. This is essentially a trolley problem.
D, if you mean bans like China's "One child policy" are disastrous and terrible and even ineffective. Family planning include incentives too, but they are usually for more children not less. This is because developed countries are faced with declining and older population. Usually a choice of populistic and nationalistic governments that don't consider immigration as an option.
I suspect this is a personality test question rather than an academic exam
Well OP claims he got his marks deducted for his answer, which usually is not a personality test, though he might be just joking.
1
u/Ldfzm 9d ago
If B is the least effective, and C and D have the major drawbacks of infringing on human rights, then I think it's pretty clear that A is the "best" option. Cause something can't be the best option if it has such major drawbacks
1
u/thefuzzylogic 9d ago
A is the slowest. There may be a time constraint that makes one of the others a better choice.
2
2
2
u/DerpDaDuck3751 9d ago
Honestly, C makes people get slaughtered or flee.
The most approved way of decreasing population
2
u/andyring 9d ago
Well, "c" and "d" are the same thing actually. Some call it abortion.
Also, "best" is by definition a subjective term, so how could you get negative marks?
2
u/gliitch0xFF 9d ago
The fact that they even posed it as an option, raises concerns. Like the board were like, yes mass extinction of a population sounds like a good idea to put down on a test. Because 1945 worked out so well. 🙄
2
2
2
2
2
2
u/EtiClash 8d ago
The problem is that family planning was heavily inforced in lots of places and failed. Worse than failing, people were hiding babies who grown anonymously and poor. I think China had lots of these problems in the past decades and is barely starting to overcome the damage those laws did.
Btw I didn't double check that last part so feel free to @ me
2
u/GuyYouMetOnline 8d ago
C is, in fact, the only answer to the question as it's actually asked. I think it was trying to ask the best way to decrease population GROWTH, but only C decreases the current population.
5
u/borlaughero 9d ago
Well, apart from your answer the next most truthful answer is actually B since the massive reduction in fertility rates are tied to urbanization more then anything else. The most correct answer, that is not on the list is globalisation. Womder what that school considers a corect answer.. You should ask your teacher for your money back 😄
14
u/YellowRasperry 9d ago
All of these answers are good answers. There’s also correlation between increased education and reduced fertility.
The “best” answer presented is C because it’s easily controlled and has guaranteed effect.
4
u/borlaughero 9d ago edited 9d ago
There is a correlation but not causation. You can see what I mean in my reply to another commenter 🍺
EDIT: Oh, sorry, all of these answers may reduce population growth, only C could reduce actual population, and that was the question.
EDIT 2: well if you mean policies like China's abandoned "One child policy", than family planning is terrible answer, especially because it was not proved to be effective and had ton of negative unintended consequences.
6
u/YellowRasperry 9d ago
Haha yeah I guess technically C is the only correct answer the way it was worded. I saw your other response too, solid explanation.
3
u/temsik1587againtwo 9d ago
Globalization isn’t really an actionable thing though.
1
u/borlaughero 9d ago
I guess you are right. There are things you could do to increase level of globalization, like free trade, or a trade deal... But, yeah, that would be a stretch for a test...
4
u/ninjabearshonobi 9d ago
I go with A. And don’t ask me why.
7
u/RandomExcaliburUmbra 9d ago
You’d be kinda right. I got a little bit more suicidal by learning how America’s political system kinda fucks us over. Knowledge sometimes makes you wanna die.
6
u/ApprehensivePick2989 9d ago
No: the “correct” answer was probably A because more educated people tend to have fewer children.
3
1
u/TartarusFalls 9d ago
I was thinking this too, but D is also true? Idk which one is MORE effective though.
1
1
1
u/GDMFB1 9d ago
Educate people? Like get them in soul crushing student loan debt that they have to push back starting a family??? Yup sounds about right.
→ More replies
1
1
1
1
1
u/_123reddituser_ 9d ago
I mean, technically yeah, the question says 'the best way' not the 'legal way'
1
0
u/Even_Passenger661 9d ago
Nope. The best way to reduce the population is to divide the country in two, and let them go to war...
6
0
u/UltraRadiation-X 9d ago
So when I post the same thing it not ok but he post it that it ok?
→ More replies
0
u/deadlygaming11 9d ago
Depends if best is quickest or most ethical. C is best for quickest whilst D is best for ethical
1
1
1
u/NotPMEG 9d ago
1
u/RepostSleuthBot 9d ago
I didn't find any posts that meet the matching requirements for r/technicallythetruth.
It might be OC, it might not. Things such as JPEG artifacts and cropping may impact the results.
I did find this post that is 50.0% similar. It might be a match but I cannot be certain.
I'm not perfect, but you can help. Report [ False Negative ]
View Search On repostsleuth.com
Scope: Reddit | Meme Filter: False | Target: 95% | Check Title: False | Max Age: Unlimited | Searched Images: 238,387,564 | Search Time: 0.52949s
1
u/Giulioimpa 9d ago
Honestly...useing "best" as a generic substitute for something evidently more specific is just lazy.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/necrolich66 9d ago
C is wrong because it is a one time thing and can be but a blip in history. Look at covid it killed so much, did not have any effect on the grand scale of things. Black plague and Genghis Khan killed like a third of the population each and see where we are today.
Most recently are the works of ideologies of the 20th century that are used to show how we could plan the mass murder of people in such an easy, quick and horrible way. As much as those are sad stories it has no effect on the large scale of things.
Better education is the number one way to make sure we stop as the human race to procreate as rabbits for not only this generation but all generations to come.
Education prevents more babies than any genocide could eradicate.
TLDR: education kills babies.
1
1
u/Burrito_Loyalist 9d ago
The problem isn’t family planning.
The problem is people are living longer overall. Old people are living to be 90 years old, that’s why we’re overpopulated.
1
u/Living_Heat_7331 9d ago
C and D are essentially the same thing considering family planning usually = abortion
1
1
1
u/Casper_Arg 9d ago
The best way is clearly to have better houses
- Oh no, population is increasing!
Contractor, craking his knuckles: Not on my watch...
1
1
1
1
u/clark12302 9d ago
What the hell? U can take ww2 as a perfect example, Hitler was evil for sure but he did what he wanted to do efficiently.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/VergilArcanis 9d ago
I know D is supposed to be the right answer, but C is just so much faster.
Plus, without context of safely or not murdering, C is absolutely the best answer
2
1
1
u/Wolf_Echo_92 9d ago
E) sterilization via injection of randomly selected individuals without their knowledge
1
1
1
1
u/Dragoncrafter00 9d ago
(E) shame people for having children and offer a free service to remove the (burden) from them
1
1
1
u/icravesimplicity 9d ago
Lmao I would've chosen that one too. I can only tell this to my husband, otherwise people think I'm a monster lmao
1
1
u/clintCamp 9d ago
If you need to reduce the population the quickest, old age and reducing reproduction are not the best option.
1
1
u/[deleted] 9d ago
Its definitely the most cost effective method and probably the most environmentally sound as long as you used the bodies for composting.
→ More replies
1
u/MightySquirddle 9d ago
Genocide is only accepted when you control a population by birthrate...duh. #moralpopulationcontrol
1
1
1
1
1
u/LeckerBockwurst 9d ago
"best" is relative and a bad wording for an exam question. Therefore answer c is technical correct.
It's obvious that the answer 'family planning' is the intended one, which makes the quiz even worse, since anyone who has not been hit with a brick can answer that correctly.
895
u/The1AMparty 9d ago
Depends on what they mean by "best". This question is worded way too vaguely to provide a uniformly/objectively correct answer