r/technology • u/nyxago • Jan 30 '23
Google's head of mental health and wellbeing was among the 12,000 workers laid off by the tech giant Business
https://www.businessinsider.com/google-layoffs-mental-health-and-wellbeing-director-jobs-workers-tech-2023-12.8k
Jan 30 '23
•
PANIC ATTACKS ARE BACK ON THE MENU, BOYS.
1.0k
Jan 30 '23
[deleted]
322
u/jrhoffa Jan 30 '23
I'd quit a job before quitting myself.
257
u/8hundredpounds Jan 30 '23
Easy to say when you’re not in the middle of it. I just had to take FMLA leave because I was so burnt out I was manifesting physical symptoms.
43
u/misa_misa Jan 30 '23
Same here (also in tech). I took FMLA last year for mental health. I LITERALLY couldn't even write an email due to burnout, depression, and every other ailment associated with those. I was sick all the time, and my shoulders were like rocks from all the stress.
I would stare at my computer and do nothing. I WANTED to work and knew that I would be fired if I stayed like this. But I physically and mentally couldn't, it was awful.
→ More replies (1)86
u/Monteze Jan 30 '23
Yeah got out of retail management for similar things. I was starting to lose my humanity and be hateful. Jobs just don't care about people, our system needs work.
43
u/8hundredpounds Jan 30 '23
I stressed out for weeeeeks before going on leave. Thank (insert chosen deity) for short term disability insurance in CA.
It took about a week for me to stop jumping at every phone call.37
u/Monteze Jan 30 '23
It's crazy how that constant vigilance creeps up on you.
29
u/8hundredpounds Jan 30 '23
Lizard brain stupid. Lizard brain love patterns. Lizard brain need rest before more rational thinking happen. 😵
23
u/Balor675 Jan 30 '23
Yeah I started having heart palpatations before taking paternity leave. Magically stopped when I was no longer working, even with the stress of a newborn. Imagine that.
3
u/8hundredpounds Jan 30 '23
lol right! After two days off, and the knowledge I wouldn’t have to go back for a while, I suddenly stopped waking up violently nauseous every day.
19
u/NecroCannon Jan 30 '23
It’s getting harder and harder to stand, I had to reduce my work days from 4 to 3.
It might not sound like much but I work in a management position with 9 hour shifts with only 15 minute breaks and they keep scheduling me to come in earlier and earlier throughout a week making it hard for me to sleep and heal. One of my off days I still have to come in for the meetings. Something’s going wrong with my legs, but I can’t afford to go to the doctor yet so reducing my work days is my only choice for now. I really hope I don’t lose them…
6
u/eolson3 Jan 31 '23
Could be circulatory. That shit will kill you. Seeing a GP could at least give you a sense of what's going on.
→ More replies (14)7
u/stuffZACKlikes Jan 31 '23
Shit, I should take better care of myself. My focus is so split from juggling different things my eye twitches at the end of pretty much every day, even weekends. I just keep going because if I stop it'll only get worse.
→ More replies (1)7
u/Dredly Jan 31 '23
The amazing thing, is you don't really notice. it tends to happen gradually over years, and the stress of "What happens if I'm NOT working and bringing in all the money" overwhelms the stress of "What if I'm not taking care of myself"
and by the time you realize that you quit yourself, its often way to late to do anything about it
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)8
u/rando194874 Jan 31 '23
As someone with a lot work anxiety right now, this actually made me feel a lot better. Thanks!
17
→ More replies (9)27
u/Ramaniso Jan 30 '23
Ah. I hate myself for laughing. But this is unfortunately true. Am not even at google and the news might give me a panic attack
→ More replies (3)
139
u/Teastainedeye Jan 30 '23
ChatGPT will handle mental health and well-being from here on.
8
→ More replies (2)8
u/ChiaraStellata Jan 31 '23
You joke but honestly ChatGPT is getting to be a big part of my support system. Therapists are highly-trained experts and really valuable, but they can't always be there. ChatGPT is always available and totally free, and it's invariably thoughtful and compassionate. Everybody should be taking advantage of it.
231
u/phoonie98 Jan 30 '23
Sounds like a position headed by Gavin Belson’s guru at Hooli
→ More replies (2)31
749
u/Freakoid3005 Jan 30 '23
Big brain move, if you fire everyone then you don't have to worry about the mental health of your employees!
148
→ More replies (6)49
u/Striker37 Jan 30 '23
They fired MAYBE 5% of their workforce. Google employs a LOT of people.
→ More replies (1)22
u/Galvanized-Sorbet Jan 30 '23
But those were the unhappy 5%. Everyone left is super excited 😅
→ More replies (3)
1.7k
u/bad_n_bougie69 Jan 30 '23
Im convinced these bullshit jobs are added to show growth in the good times and first to be cut to appease stockholders in the bad
622
u/Saneless Jan 30 '23
Yep. Earnings call 1: we've had a lot of growth. We're hiring a bunch of people to manage it because holy moly it's so much stuff that the workers will help grow it even more
One year later: that didn't happen because of completely external things, not our leadership whatsoever. We're going to lay off people to cut costs. Please like us
319
u/benjtay Jan 30 '23
because of completely external things
No no no no. The 2023 buzzphrase is "macro economic conditions".
63
26
u/OneBrickShy58 Jan 30 '23
Oh god. It’s so fucking transparent. They say it in a way to both inspire fear and imply you know what they are talking about. The macro economic conditions means I can’t get a raise to coincide with inflation? Well fuck you then.
13
u/pizzzahero Jan 30 '23 •
![]()
CEOs in 2020: "Wow; we've seen 200% growth in 8 months! This trend will definitely continue even though it was caused by a massively anomalous, once in a lifetime event that impacted every single person on earth. Let's make long term decisions using this information!"
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (4)8
→ More replies (1)6
u/Cryptic0677 Jan 30 '23
Good times: we are so awesome look how much money we’re making! Let’s give the executives big bonuses?
Bad times: everything is terrible but it’s definitely not anything we did it’s just how the market is, how can we expect our executives to take a pay cut for something that isn’t their fault? Oh by the way we need to lay off ten percent of our staff to save money, we should give some of that to our executives for saving shareholders money!
48
u/RelativeChance Jan 30 '23
One of the first few lines of the article says that she was working at the company for almost 15 years so this was not a job they just manufactured to be cut during a downturn
→ More replies (2)55
u/hotredsam2 Jan 30 '23
One of my business professors also thinks that they are trying to take talent off the market so competition has a harder time getting good staff
78
u/ImportantEvidence280 Jan 30 '23
I'm sure all the big tech companies are fighting over heads of mental health and wellbeing.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (8)29
u/sincerely_ignatius Jan 30 '23
100%. hiring engineers by itself is a business strategy. hoarding talent. Something tells me head of mental health is not one of those super important types of positions.
67
u/BillyShears17 Jan 30 '23
A minority shareholder as a matter of fact! A dude who has no real power managed to squeeze Sundar's balls!
142
u/Prodigy195 Jan 30 '23
That investor had likely zero to do with these cuts. Don't let him be the scapegoat. This was a decision by Google execs and founders.
→ More replies (1)45
u/letsbefrds Jan 30 '23
Wasn't there a letter to the CEO from big share holders to cut jobs?
Honestly though, Google has a project management problem they keep pumping out apps and deleting them.
Apparently it's a way for PMs to get promoted or something. I think I've had 5 messenger apps from Google already.
41
u/Prodigy195 Jan 30 '23
Yeah the guy from TCI fund wrote a letter.
My point is that people keep pointing the finger at him as if his letter was the impetus for making these cuts happen. It wasn't that hedge fund that prompted this.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (2)14
u/AtomWorker Jan 30 '23
The letter was written after this wave of layoffs was announced. That guy wants to see even deeper cuts.
→ More replies (1)18
Jan 30 '23 edited 21d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies (1)15
u/DarkwingDuckHunt Jan 30 '23
0.5%, of a S&P 500 company, is actually a giant chunk of a company by wallstreet standards.
→ More replies (1)39
u/bad_n_bougie69 Jan 30 '23
Im pretty sure Redditors have no idea how high level investors work, let alone better than the CEO of Alphabet
→ More replies (20)→ More replies (36)23
u/speedlimits65 Jan 30 '23
100%. our company had multiple complaints by staff and patients regarding issues with racism. hired a DEI director for $200k who wasnt allowed to make any changes and left the company after 9 months. management patted themselves on the back for overcoming diversity and being anti-racist. for black history month i shit you not they served us fried chicken.
→ More replies (4)
217
u/horsepuncher Jan 30 '23
During a “recession “ anything looking out for the disposable workers is no longer needed. Time to layoff half , tell the existing half to double up their workload, and explain no raise this year sorry.
14
u/UnevenSquirrelPerch Jan 31 '23 •
![]()
These big companies are literally doing layoffs just because... Everyone else is doing layoffs 🙄 https://news.stanford.edu/2022/12/05/explains-recent-tech-layoffs-worried/
6
u/horsepuncher Jan 31 '23
Yes,financially there is no reason for layoffs with any of these companies. Only guess i have is clever layoffs to those about to cash in on on stocks promised at hiring
→ More replies (1)54
22
u/w3bCraw1er Jan 30 '23
Mental health, Diversity; these are the first jobs to go. You know these are just farce from management.
458
u/mrgreyeyes Jan 30 '23 edited Jan 30 '23
Head of wellbeing sounds really expendable.
260
u/cabur Jan 30 '23
Yeh nobody talking about how that position def sounds like a padded job that had a expiration anyway. There are plenty of ways to ensure employee wellbeing that don’t need a fucking executive position for it.
52
u/melteemarshmelloo Jan 30 '23
buy the workers a pizza party every quarter, don't forget the soda and napkins and some pats on the back
NO YOU CANNOT HAVE A RAISE!!!!
5
u/correcthorsestapler Jan 31 '23
“Sorry, times are tough. We all gotta make sacrifices.”
drives off in their brand new $80k pickup
→ More replies (8)72
u/Giannie Jan 30 '23
In an organisation of that size, if you’re serious about maintaining policies that support and maintain employee wellbeing, then an executive position is definitely appropriate.
A good executive in that position will challenge other executives to ensure the company wide policies do not compromise the wellbeing of employees.
Obviously that is exactly what these executives do every day /s
→ More replies (4)54
→ More replies (4)62
u/doobur Jan 30 '23
Lol for real
Oh No! They fired the cheerleaders to keep the quarterback! What will the team do now!?
→ More replies (26)
33
48
u/Substantial_Sun_8477 Jan 30 '23
Well, if he starts his own company he has at least 12k new potential clients.
→ More replies (1)
162
u/DoesntWantToBe Jan 30 '23
"Filings Google made in California show that the company laid off dozens of directors across various divisions in the state."
Sucks they seem to have cut so many high level developers and all, but can't really go wrong by cutting down on managers during layoffs.
Dozens of directors, a head of mental health and well-being, and according to the article "many people" in the health and well-being...team?!
How does anyone take that seriously? I can't even take HR seriously since they started calling themselves POps.
→ More replies (12)53
u/lkhsnvslkvgcla Jan 30 '23
"Filings Google made in California show that the company laid off dozens of directors across various divisions in the state."
when they're laying off thousands in the state, "dozens" of directors doesn't sound like a lot after all.
19
u/captain_awesomesauce Jan 30 '23
dozens of directors = hundreds of managers = thousands of employees?
→ More replies (1)
85
Jan 30 '23 edited Jan 30 '23
[deleted]
→ More replies (6)18
u/alpacafox Jan 30 '23
I don't know about every company, but the companies I worked for had this as a standard task of every team lead and manager: Keep your people happy and motivated.
12
107
u/Jesukii Jan 30 '23
Don't you know that Covid is over, so we don't have to worry about mental health anymore!
→ More replies (2)16
178
u/BigTradeDeal69_420 Jan 30 '23
What the hell does a head of mental health and well-being do, weekly all-company meditation calls on Google Meet?
→ More replies (13)268
u/brettmjohnson Jan 30 '23
Before I retired 5 years ago, Google strived to tip the work/life balance toward "work". They did this by helping out on the life part. The cafes served better food than you could get in most restaurants in the Mountain View/Sunnyvale area. They had in-house laundry/dry-cleaning drop-offs. Plush new mother nursing rooms, and equally plush massage rooms. Indoor and outdoor sports and physical fitness. Music rooms to chill and practice. Meditation booths to relax and focus. All the bathrooms had Toto Washlet bidet toilets (which I installed in my house). They did a bunch to support your non-work life in order let you focus on your work life.
While I was working for Google, my wife died after a prolonged illness. Outside of that, the work pace and expectations were high, leading to great stress. These things affect one's mental well-being. In facilities with thousands of employees, mental health services fit in with all of the other life services provided.
What we are seeing now is the conversion of the tech industry toward a more traditional manufacturing industry, where the employees are seen as disposable and easily replaceable. Across the sector, more than 200,000 people have been turfed in the last few months. When everybody is firing and nobody is hiring, this is the perfect time to launch a new start-up.
140
u/Gyalgatine Jan 30 '23
Google layoffee here. Am now working on my own startup as well. Got a pretty generous severance package so hey, why not. Google basically just gave me seed funding with no strings attached.
21
u/JH_1999 Jan 30 '23
What kind of startup?
80
u/Gyalgatine Jan 30 '23
Been working on a video game for the last 5 years in my free time. It's been a passion project and now I finally have the time and the money to try to finish it full time! I know it's not likely to make money, but I enjoy it and I'm still fairly young, so why not. :)
Worst case, it fails I'll have learned a bunch of stuff about management/entrepreneurship and I'll hopefully have something nice to have on my resume next year.
→ More replies (7)8
15
u/okawei Jan 30 '23
I wish I was laid off by google for this exact reason lol
7
u/Gyalgatine Jan 30 '23
Yea, honestly I'm not all that unhappy about being laid off. But maybe this will change in a few months once I start feeling the pressure of the money fizzling out.
→ More replies (9)9
u/panda_bear_ Jan 30 '23
Hey, another Google layoffee here. Produced playwright and content expert during the day.
You need anything to do with words, I’d be happy to offer what I can do your video game.
51
u/DevAway22314 Jan 30 '23
What we are seeing now is the conversion of the tech industry toward a more traditional manufacturing industry, where the employees are seen as disposable and easily replaceable
I think that is a bit too extreme of a view. A year ago we had the best market in history for tech workers, this is just a bit of a return to the mean. Certainly no one is rolling out the red carpet anymore, but tech workers are still getting treated like working professionals with money and perks
When everybody is firing and nobody is hiring, this is the perfect time to launch a new start-up
In terms of finding talent, sure. The biggest problem for start-ups is capital though, which is not easy to find. The ease of start-up capital a couple years ago was a big driver of the hiring frenzy
→ More replies (13)17
u/MooseHeckler Jan 30 '23 edited Jan 30 '23
I am sorry about your wife. The recent change at Google is sobering, the industry seemed like a safe haven compared to other industries.
→ More replies (3)
333
u/OaklandToker Jan 30 '23
Sundar promised no layoffs and that they would focus on increasing efficiency. How is anyone under him going to follow his leadership in the future? Surely, with a heavy pinch of salt.
292
u/HP844182 Jan 30 '23
Probably because they get paid to
106
Jan 30 '23 edited Jan 31 '23
[deleted]
17
u/seeafish Jan 30 '23
It makes me sad to admit it, but you’re right. Like 100% right.
Even people who feign dismay and talk shit about the CEO ultimately take home a healthy 6 figures with stonks and bonuses. They buy cars and houses, eat steaks and sushi, travel the world, all while very upset that the fat cats at the top make these types of decisions.
Turns out us humans are really easy to keep in line.
→ More replies (2)12
Jan 30 '23 edited Jan 31 '23
[deleted]
→ More replies (1)5
u/Simba7 Jan 30 '23
40-50k is good sellout money when you have a lot of little things to sell out on. That really adds up!
94
u/Wannaliveinpenthouse Jan 30 '23
He only follows the board because they gave him the place he has now. The rest is all PR bullshit. Layoff 10000 employee he’s still CEO, share price kept tanking, he might be the one getting layoff.
41
u/icantfindanametwice Jan 30 '23
It’s a mystery why he’s not getting fired really. Worst CEO performance of the Nasdaq and unlike say Mark, or Elno, he isn’t a founder, owner, or holder of the vaunted voting class shares that give him all the options.
Then again, Page dated his underling Mayer so maybe they’re giving Sundar extra time to …finish fishing from the company pool?
→ More replies (1)35
u/Maze_of_Ith7 Jan 30 '23
He really isn’t the right guy.
They picked him because he got along splendidly with everyone which is a recipe for stasis. To his credit he is great testifying in front of Congressional subcommittees.
I’d either want an innovator or someone Ops/cost focused, he is neither.
23
u/WearSomeClothes Jan 30 '23
Didn't Sundar lead the creation of Chrome ? That is what vaunted him up the corporate ladder.
He is successful tech knowing manager.
And you sure do not need a pure bean counter for tech company. That is how the rot begins.
→ More replies (1)60
u/ShowerVagina Jan 30 '23
Let's say 10k employees cost the company 300k each a year on average. $3b total. Google's operating costs were $176b in 2022, up 26% from 2021.
They're saving a little more than 5% in operating costs while at the same time damaging their reputation, losing their spent, and turning away potential future talent. The amount they're cutting is about the same as what they hired last year.
They should have just done a hiring freeze.
21
u/dr3wzy10 Jan 30 '23
Ah, yes but then the shareholders would worry that there isn't constant growth! /s
16
u/Jofai Jan 30 '23
Just a quick math check: $3B / $176B is 1.7%, not 5%+. But your numbers probably are wrong; the OpEx from the 12 months (Q3'21 - Q3'22) from the last report are over $200B (my guess is ~$210B, but we'll find out for sure on Thurs).
So yeah, it's actually even less impactful.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (7)7
u/g0ing_postal Jan 31 '23
There's a lot more damage than that-
You lose institutional knowledge. Things that an experienced engineer knew how to fix in a couple hours are now days long debugging sessions
You break down communications. The person you normally contact to get things done is gone. Now you need to go find someone else, who may not have the context or experience of the person before them
you damage morale. Why work hard when anyone can be laid off for seemingly no reason?
you impact timelines. Projects are planned with x resources to be completed by y date. If you have fewer resources then it takes longer to complete the project
→ More replies (1)54
u/wood_orange443 Jan 30 '23
I don’t remember him promising no layoffs. Do you have a source?
44
u/mtsai Jan 30 '23
theres zero change any ceo would promise that. recessions are cyclical, its guaranteed.
→ More replies (1)6
u/big_orange_ball Jan 31 '23
There is so much blatantly incorrect info in this thread it's ridiculous. So many /r/confidentlyincorrect people who know far less than what they're trying to convince others of.
→ More replies (5)7
u/way2lazy2care Jan 30 '23
The only thing I remember him promising was a thinly veiled way of saying, "expect layoffs," in their simplicity sprint.
81
u/Sad_Damage_1194 Jan 30 '23 edited Jan 30 '23
Employment is all about cognitive dissonance. You have to believe your full-time job is “permanent” and show loyalty to the company, all while knowing nothing (save for change) is permanent, and they hold no loyalty whatsoever to you. They say business isn’t personal while knowing it’s extremely personal. You have to ignore that and tow the party line. Nothing makes sense… not the way I see it.
18
u/jmc323 Jan 30 '23
Had a dude from my company who had been there for like 10-15 years. Didn't really know him personally too well but had crossed paths occasionally. I knew his reputation as someone who knew damn near everything about most of our systems and software, with a bit of an abrasive and conceited personality but still someone valuable and vital with all of his knowledge.
He got caught up in the layoffs that eventually hit following Covid. Guessing maybe he had an inflated salary and it looked like a good chunk of change to chop off on a spreadsheet to some executive or higher level manager. I'm sure he was practically nameless to them.
Dude had a full blown meltdown on LinkedIn, I mean it was like a public mental implosion that went on for days and days, rivaling the worst romantic relationship breakup disasters I've ever seen. Just a barrage of posts about "I gave so much of myself to this company, how could you do this to me, I'm broken, devastated, etc., etc." He even came back on over a year later freaking out about getting some news about the company in his news feed.
All I could think reading through the mayhem was holy fuck dude, it's a job. Just a paycheck. Why would you ever think some faceless corporation was going to actually give a fuck about you or anything other than its bottom line? Yeah you blow smoke up their ass about the company mission or whatever while you're there because that's the game, but I didn't think anyone really bought into that shit besides a very, very few in very small organizations where they're actually truly passionate about some work and not just there to get paid.
→ More replies (2)12
u/lovetron99 Jan 30 '23
There's a lesson in here, and I think it's an important one: stop giving so much to your employer. Stop canceling vacations, stop working so much voluntary overtime, stop missing the kids' piano recitals, stop missing family meals, all for a company that has no allegiance or loyalty to you. Go in, do your job, do it well, go home. Tomorrow is promised to no one.
→ More replies (1)19
u/-RadarRanger- Jan 30 '23
You have to ignore that and
towtoe the party lineFTFY
You're not pulling water-skiers, you're walking up to an imaginary line drawn in the dirt and not daring to cross it.
→ More replies (5)6
16
→ More replies (20)20
u/IHate2ChooseUserName Jan 30 '23
if you trust your CEO or anyone leadership in your company, you are naive.
16
u/synicalx1 Jan 30 '23
To be fair, almost no companies have a "head of mental health and wellbeing" let alone and entire team managed by such a person, so Google suddenly not having one doesn't exactly make them some kind of weird outlier.
30
u/FreshPrinceOfRivia Jan 30 '23
There was a similar guy at my previous company. He actually managed to retain some people for a few extra months at a particularly doomed project. But eventually people assigned to that project started to quit en masse anyway. Personally, I gave myself a pretty hefty raise by switching jobs.
55
u/Expensive_Finger_973 Jan 30 '23
This is probably an insensitive and controversial take, but I can't understand how her position going away could possibly come as a surprise to her. Mental health and wellbeing is a line item meaning "we cover visits to mental health professionals" in a company comp package everywhere I have ever worked. Not a whole managerial position with direct reports.
On the surface these types of positions seem like the kind of thing you get into knowing it is on borrowed time. So you stay in it a little while to bank the fat salary while there is so much cash floating around no one is listening to the accountants and then get out, hopefully before those above you get wise.
I don't want to come off as a total ass and like I am blaming the victim, but I would be really interested to know what that job even entailed beyond managing a very specific part of the employee comp package and maybe some town hall type meetings to disseminate that information.
→ More replies (10)19
u/lovetron99 Jan 30 '23
All I know is that I'm having a mental health and wellbeing issue, the last person I'm going to is a fellow employee, regardless of what her job title is. And I don't even feel like this is a hot take. Wouldn't surprise me if they found no one is utilizing this service.
→ More replies (5)
109
u/high_roller_dude Jan 30 '23
this is a fluff position that was probably getting paid way too much money. just like those "chief of diversity and inclusion" type of bs jobs that add zero shareholder value.
these companies shouldnt have created these fluff positions to start with.
→ More replies (4)33
u/ElCapitanAbrasivo Jan 30 '23
that add zero shareholder value.
But they sure pump up those ECG scores!
15
u/NevermoreTheSF Jan 30 '23
Are you talking about ESG or is ECG another new rubric I’ve missed out on ?
14
u/ElCapitanAbrasivo Jan 30 '23
Economy for the common good. Same general idea, considerable overlap but different model/framework and weighting.
ESG would have been used better here.
12
30
u/TopofTheTits Jan 30 '23
So lemme get this straight, Google made like $100 billion in 2022, and they choose to lay off 12,000 employees? It's clearly not a money issue, seeing as Google is crazy rich, so what's the reason?
34
12
→ More replies (2)8
u/djfreshswag Jan 30 '23
Each division and individual project at any company should be evaluated for viability, growth and profit potential. Google isn’t just the search engine, workspace, YouTube, cloud, pixel. They have hundreds of products and projects they’re trying to develop. A lot of those are useless and stupid, having teams doing stuff with zero abject value. Hell, they even had/have ophthalmology clinical trials they were running with no idea what they were doing. Cutting dozens/hundreds of these projects that have nothing to do with their core businesses, have low profit potential, and have extremely low chance of ever coming to market just makes sense
5
73
u/Pradeep_offthecliff Jan 30 '23
also lost...
Sr. Director of Front Door Greeting
Director of Vegan Lunch Strategy
Scooter Parking Manager
Sr Director of Coffee Operations
Bathroom Attendant Team
Sr Director of Beer Blast Scheduling
23
u/ListRepresentative32 Jan 30 '23
All those were really believable until I read the "Bathroom attendant team"
10
12
u/TheAnonFeels Jan 30 '23
I had GPT3.5 make some more for you
Sr Director of After Hours Events
Campus Recycling Manager
Office Plant Caretaker Team
Sr Director of Lobby Furniture Arrangement
Gym Membership Coordinator
Sr Director of Snack Options
Outdoor Grilling Team
Sr Director of Employee Appreciation Initiatives
Social Committee Coordinator
→ More replies (1)
12
u/ThreeTwoOneQueef Jan 31 '23
It turns out DEI teams are a hindrance. Companies have to go back to hiring the best and brightest no matter what background they are from. I've seen first hand what happens when you don't, let's give up the BS.
7
u/TheManWithNoNameZapp Jan 30 '23
Because it’s performative that they had it to begin with. The whole position was created for good publicity idk why people can’t see through this corporate “good guys” garbage. They pay you money for your labor and can cut you at a moments notice. That’s the way it is. Join or don’t accordingly
4
u/dogballs8 Jan 31 '23
Based on all the LinkedIn updates I've read, there was no rhyme or reason attached to whom was laid off. Usually bottom performers are targeted but if you read the posts, it was scatter-shot. Top performers on teams were let go, people with tenure, people without it, etc., etc. People managers of those impacted weren't even informed who on their own team was getting fired. Discoveries were made only when they tried to log in to their work email and were denied entry.
4
u/Dinsdale_P Jan 31 '23
pretty much all of Google's decisions have been varying degrees of batshit insane in the last decade, so I'm guessing the guy wasn't doing much good.
5
u/bigbangbillyeast Jan 31 '23
Longevity in a company means you either make money or save money. If you are an expense then you are expendable.
4
u/scabbyshitballs Jan 31 '23
This is a bullshit job title anyway. Like wtf does that guy do all day, really?
→ More replies (1)
6.5k
u/mediocretes Jan 30 '23
Those that survive the layoffs aren’t going to have time for mental health and well-being, they just got a bunch of extra work to do.