Nah, “Asterix and Caesar’s Gift”. 🙂
Nah, “Asterix and Caesar’s Gift”. 🙂
It’s from “Asterix and Caesar’s Gift ” by René Goscinny and Albert Uderzo.
Yes, I can live with that definition … Iä! Iä! Cthulhu fhtagn! Ph’nglui mglw’nafh Cthulhu R’lyeh wgah-nagl fhtagn. Thanks for the clarification.
And the one, floating in through the open window … how was that called again?
Yes, it took me about 5 seconds.
😂 (Must have missed that episode. 🥹)
So that is what Hobbits really look like!!!
(As it reminds me of Samwise Gamgee facing Shelob.)
The wooden components are, what makes them so precious in my opinion. (:
(What wonders me more, is that they happen to have four pair of legs, no three.)
How very disgusting, this Mr. Hogan!
Nationalise Google, Facebook and Amazon? If somebody posted that on Google, Facebook and Amazon, I’d say, “well, they seem to not know better”. But posting that in the noncommercial Fediverse? Why?
I would have to agree, I assume?
deleted by creator
How about this ice-cream-van?
The emphasis lies on ‘could’ and ‘might’.
I do like this one.
Anybody an idea, what those 34 broken rules precisely were? The linked article don’t say.
So if data (or is it data?) is plural, what is the singular form then? Date? Like in … dating? 😍