at 17 kmph?! that’s hardly a woosh.
at 17 kmph?! that’s hardly a woosh.
what do they have playing on the radio? lionel richie?
isn’t 17 kmph kinda slow, though?
i guess he’s so pissed at the LGBTQ+ crowd because he doesn’t have an ALT key?
he’s so good at comedic roles that he often has himself in splits in his movies.
“it’s been a long road…”
i want to make an app called “my leg” and set it to break apple store policy so that the eventual headline can read, “apple pulls my leg”.
topologically, though, isn’t that just the same as all speaking and listening? it’s all mouth to ear.
if anything, force-fitting 69 seems unduly contrived. like if you shake someone by the hand, the top of your palm 69’s the bottom of theirs. or if you give them a high-five, it’s the forefinger and pinky.
or if you respond to this comment, we’ll be 69ing each other’s eyes with our fingers.
i mean, isn’t it a submarine, after all?
it could be a feature to be added to their prime subscription?
i once suffered from a punctured lung
and later a fire-ant bit my tongue,
but neither gave me as much pain
or drove me as batshit insane
as did plying my custom to shitty samsung.
“catfishers hate this one clever trick!”
wait, in the article, why is his left eye removed in the first photo and his right eye in the next?
since when are nazis so against electricity? or is it that she personally prefers gas?
i’d hate to see what’s “snow white” in this version.
conjecture: maybe autocorrect once got hold of “bugger” and things kind of evolved from there?
i was getting ready for forty winks
when, lo, up popped this post on the Sphinx;
that ensued in a long stroll
down the wikipedia rabbithole
and a whole host of now-purple hyperlinks.
how would you feel about an article titled,
“This” word in article titles infuriates internet readers
do take the time to read the full article. particularly the section titled “LASIK vs. Reading Glasses”.
separately, my cohorts and I are in the mid-40s and have undergone LASIK evaluation. the unanimous consensus given each of us is that we will have to undergo the procedure again and again as our eyes age. that we will have to fall back on glasses.
i speak from personal experience on this topic.
but to “filter”, it needs to see what it’s filtering, right? how are concerns allayed here?
it’s like saying, “i’ll just peek at you when you’re showering but – cross my heart and hope to die – i won’t fap to that mental picture later.”