Everything is relative, my man. That said, you have a unique assortment of heroes with no control or damage specialists. By themselves, they range from average to great, but put together like this, they might have weaknesses easily exploited by others.

So he was known for threes, dunks, and defense. Who wouldn't wanna have him?

So he doesn't have to return the paid salary even if he doesn't fulfill his end of the bargain?

He now has a $400 million net worth.

Who's Jabba the Hutt in this?

You know a show ended badly when the possibility of a plot device widely bemoaned as the lamest trope of them all "saves" the narrative for you.

You can't minor in a subject at Yale.

She’s Jane Fonda. A hippie who’s still around but not nearly as relevant as before

Bravo

Must have an insane PER

vein

Hell, Karl Malone about to bust out his old Lakers uniform, too

Damn, I also think Kobe should be outside of top 5 and rank around 10, but saying he doesn't belong on a top 20 list is a thermonuclear take

How do you know in advance that Team C would take the player from the first trade with Team A, though?

Sounds like a piece of shit

Ah the happy memories of the red wedding…

Why would you do that to yourself

It absolutely was for fan service. I think El Camino as a whole was an optional story intended as a cash grab fan service, anyway.

I feel like we can/should ask ourselves these questions about any stock investing strategy, not just for a hypothetical "interview".

I guess Smart is better on what he does best (defense) than Kuzma does on his (offense), but they're both deeply flawed players, and it's a kinda moot point comparing who's better between the two, I think.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Twain_effect

Biggest fluke games, as measured as the biggest outliers in terms of standard deviation from a given player's career mean performance.