So if there was a switch you could flip that would prevent 100 kids from otherwise dying of cancer, would you flip it?

No, because the ramifications of such could be tremendous. Our world depends on life and death, so removing one of those would definitely upset the balance.

I understand that you and I do not have the same beliefs of life and death. Maybe it would be best for you to explain why you think death is bad.

Death is bad, is effectively saying that death is evil.

Death is sad is effectively saying that death makes you feel sorrow.

Death isn't an evil, it is a necessity for life.

Not only that but this video feels like the "good rich" is fighting for the "little guy" against the "big bad billionaires". If this channel had a good idea at the right time, they would suddenly change their toon as they become self made.

Of course, it's probably not a coincidence that the two he fired were 2 of the 3 women on the board

This isn't sexism. Stop it with that crap.

You seem to be implying that a kid with cancer that died at 1 month was a worthless life & death.

Even for that 1 month old kid, that death wasn't bad. It is sad and unfortunate but not bad.

https://www.history.com/news/seat-belt-laws-resistance

It took government to bribe big business to convince Americans that seatbelts mandates were important....

I agree that many people are highly leveraged such that even a 10% paycut would put them homeless. Maybe not everyone, like a 48 yr old marketing coordinator, will come out in a better life but just as people aren't willing to live in texas due to the abortion bill maybe this is a line in the sand for enough people to rejuvenate the small business industry.

Death is a part of life. It is neither good nor bad and the action of people dying it normal.

Trying to prevent death at all costs is a substantial drain on society and the limit at which we try to prevent death is certainly a good topic to debate.

Do you have any studies that show that? Anything that shows the amount of time necessary to be in contact with someone in order to get a large enough viral load.

Is it? Because we should then ban sugar, ban tobacco, ban alcohol.

And is people dying a bad thing?

Nothing. Why do we want the federal government to do anything?

According to BLS, 9.6 million are self employed. I don't see why that number cant increase.

Just have to avoid large corporations. There are tons of small businesses. Back in 2018, close to 40million people were employees of firms less than 100. There are lots of options.

So much for my body my choice.....I guess the government can control what goes into your body.

You and I are not disagreeing that the code needs to change. Honestly, I'm not sure what you are disagreeing with.

Its possible a place lies between "nothing" and "everything" when one looks at altering deductions and adjustments, you know.

While true, every single line of tax code beyond the income tax table allows for someone somewhere to manipulate it.

All articles like this are is rage bait. They want you to be mad without giving any real ways to resolve the issue.

Look at the charts and tell me you do not see seasonal waves. If you don't you are blind.

At least after 2021, we will stop using the faulty PCR test so that we don't include actual flu cases (as per the CDC).

Our taxes are based on income not worth so that "true tax rate" is bullshit. If you want to start taxing wealth, then just say that.

Otherwise, the easiest way to remove all of the BS "the rich don't pay enough" is to eliminate 99% of the tax code. No deductions, no credits, no adjustments.

The reality is, the majority are now vaccinated and we are increasingly pissed off at the unvaccinated for prolonging this shit.

It is not the unvaccinated fault that the vaccinated are unwilling move on with their lives.

Do not try to save those who do not wish to be saved.

True, but not everyone can be a king. There needs to be value in being a lord/serf/peasant as well as having a king. The peasant need to be able to own their own land and their own food, but the peasant can not do that by taking from others.

Part of what America great in the past was the lack of taxes. There is very little we actually need to pay for and yet we constantly find new ways to get into debt.

Define "his fair share". Are you asking to repeal the IRS and goto a flat tax system?

Honestly if they bring it back, it needs to be hard. It needs to scale with your gear so that skill (and a little luck) is the only thing that gets it down.