• Honytawk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That is just because the people who enforce the EDPB guidelines just haven’t come around to fining those websites.

    That practice is still illegal.

    Want to speed up the process? You can report those websites. The more reports the faster those get punished.

    • Sphks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, that’s not that clear for the moment.

      Let me explain the French case :

      • Webedia is a big company that owns most of the famous French websites (jeuxvideo.com , etc.). All these websites have cookie walls with an alternative : a paid subsription. What they say, is that the website is now accessible with subscription only. However, if you accept cookies, you’ll get a discount (free access).
      • The CNIL (a big French governemental entity) tried to forbid this. If someone reports a website, it’s for this entity to take action. There is no need to report Webedia, the CNIL knows already :-)
      • The Conseil d’Etat (juridical entity of the French gov) said that “non”, it’s OK for Webedia to use such paywalls. The CNIL can’t forbid Webedia to use them.
      • The CNIL asked the jusrists at the European level… here we are. We still don’t know.

      Here is a French website where the CNIL explains this :
      https://www.cnil.fr/fr/cookie-walls-la-cnil-publie-des-premiers-criteres-devaluation

      • harlatan@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, seems like my gdpr knowledge got too rusty. at least to me its an interesting topic to actualise