• BombOmOm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        They are also damn helpful for defending life. A Smith and Wesson puts the daintiest of women on an equal field with the burliest of asailants.

        • Андрей Быдло@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          God brought us different, but Colt made us equal, blah-blah-blah.

          The difference between trained criminal who started and dictate the situation and an unprepared civilian is just too big. Not to say about how seeing a gun or a sudden movement would trigger an instant attack. You overestimate reflexes of a regular person and their ability to use firearms. Self-defence gun in a bag is more of a risk for an owner and others rather than an affective detterent.

          Guns should be. Under the lock. People who casually carry them around just in case aren’t a solution but a problem themselves.

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m not sure why it would. Almost every state requires some manner of concealed carry permit, and it’s not uncommon for there to be some manner of registration for some weapons, as long as the permitting and registration processes are “reasonable” and not designed to infringe on your rights.

        • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Is the issue that he was denied needlessly, or that he didn’t even try to register or get a carry license?

          Also, your link describes Hawaii as a shall-issue state per a previous supreme Court ruling.

          • CaptainProton@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            There’s Shall Issue and there’s “Shall Issue”. Where I live (Bay area) it’s 18 months wait and about $2,000 in fees including a state appointed psychiatrist who asks questions all of which have obvious correct answers. I think you need a coworker (specifically a coworker) to write a reference letter too. Also there’s a separate law saying you cannot carry in most places, basically rendering the permit useless.

            I’m not sure what Hawaii was doing but basically all the blue states have some flavor of this, where in the past your kids just had to go to the same school at the sheriff’s or you had to be an executive at a company or a celebrity and you got to carry anywhere you liked. At least now the same rules apply to everyone?

            • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              Okay?

              So you’re not sure what Hawaii’s rules on carry permits are, but you’re sure they’re bad, and that excuses not registering a weapon purchased out of state.

              For the record, a cursory search says it’s pretty straightforward to get a permit. Like, take a safety course, fill out a form and provide copies of a photo of yourself and get fingerprinted.

              And yeah, they do have restrictions on where you can carry, which sounds like a protection of the rights of the rest of the people to me. If people don’t want to be around guns, they should be able to say you can’t bring one into their home or store without explicit permission, at the least.