How can it possibly be, that an ISP, which I’m paying for gets to decid, which sites I’m allowed to have access to, and which not?

All the torrenting sites are restricted. I know, I can use VPN, and such… but I want to do it because of my privacy concerns and not because of some higher-up decided to bend over for the lobbying industry.

While on the other hand, if there’s a data breach of a legit big-corp website (looking at you FB), I’m still able to access it, they get fined with a fraction of their revenue, and I’m still left empty-handed. What a hipocracy!!

What comes next? Are they gonna restrict me from using lemmy too, bc some lobbyist doesn’t like the fact that it’s a decentralized system which they have no control over?

Rant, over!

I didn’t even know that my router was using my ISPs DNS, and that I can just ditch it, even though I’m running AdGuard (selfhosted)

  • z00s@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Well you can buy a car but the gov’t will still make you drive on the correct side of the road.

  • XTornado@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    No offense but if they can do that you have to blame your government not the ISP… as those are the ones allowing this to happen.

  • LisPi@mastodon.top
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    @ad_on_is The problem you’re hitting is that the #clearnet / #Internet in general weren’t adequately designed to handle malicious #infrastructure operators.

    “The 'net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it” was a comment about #Usenet, a #federated / #P2P system with gossiped (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gossip_protocol) message exchange which wasn’t particularly picky about its transport layer (indeed you could load a spool on a floppy and mail it), not the internet.

    • Ilikecheese@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I don’t know if you’re choosing to add those hashtags to your comment or if it’s just something that mastodon does automatically, but holy fuckweasels is that shit annoying.

  • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Counter rant: This is why we built encryption and VPNs many years ago. This is a solved problem, but rather than solving it you’d rather just complain ineffectually about it. The solution, the product of years of work of technical people and privacy people, is sitting right there staring you in the face available for you to use as a free service, a paid service, or your own self-hosted service. Use a VPN, that’s what it’s for.

    • mlfh@lemmy.ml
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s still right to complain and protest about something that is unjust, even when ways to circumvent it exist. Because the next logical policy step is to ban VPNs, as many countries already have, and the solved problem becomes unsolved again.