• Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Took me a lot of years to not think it’s my company that is being run into the ground. I should not - and nowadays could not - care any less.

    • jbrains@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      The book The Responsibility Virus helped me a lot with this. Most people are over-responsible for the choices of others, specifically ones they can’t reasonably influence, anyway.

    • ME5SENGER_24@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      My uncle spent years preaching to me about the need to be loyal to a company. I never drank the Kool-Aid. He spent 21 years working for an investment banking company in their IT department. 4 years before he was set to retire with a full pension, etc. his company was acquired by a larger bank. He lost everything except his 401k. He then spent the next 12 years working to get his time back so he’d be able to retire. He died 2 years ago and the company sent a bouquet of flowers.

      THE COMPANY DOESN’T CARE ABOUT YOU!!

      • Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        How do you lose a pension? It doesn’t matter where you work or if a company gets bought.

        • ME5SENGER_24@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          So the way he explained it to me was that essentially when the company was purchased all your accruals were reset and the pension was tied to years of service, which he hadn’t reached yet, then with the merger you were essentially a new employee. There was also a lot tied to retirement plans linked to corporate stocks that were basically useless after they merged. Either way, beyond working for the same company forever, his eggs were (mostly) in one basket.

          • Idontreallyknow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yet another reason to be glad to live in the EU:

            TUPE Regulations

            Basically, “any employee’s contract of employment will be transferred automatically on the same terms as before in the event of a transfer of the undertaking. This means that if an employer changes control of the business, the new employer cannot reduce the employees’ terms and conditions”

            This regulation and strong unions are the backbone of job security in the EU.

    • XEAL@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Not even if you do valuable or efficent stuff for the company. You’re disposable.

      • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        The company is always on the lookout for ways to replace you with somebody who will do more for less.

        And in the meantime, they will squeeze you for every drop of effort they think they can get away with.

        • Chapo0114 [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Or less for less. I know a woman who is a manager of a dialysis clinic, as soon as she was making over 100k she started getting pushback from higher ups, having more oversight, and having her funds for extra services to patients / staff cut. It’s clear they want her out even though she has the lowest mortality in the region, because they don’t need more than beds filled (Medicaid pays) and legally required minimums to be met.

  • masterspace@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    The most important traits for doing well at work (in this order):

    • clear, effective, and efficient communication
    • taking ownership of problems
    • having your boss and team members like you on a personal level
    • competence at your tasks
    • AFK BRB Chocolate (CA version)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’m halfway through scrolling this long thread, and this is the first comment I’ve seen that isn’t overly cynical. It’s also correct.

      I’ve been working for 38 years, and I’ve been someone who makes promotion decisions for 15 of them. The third one is helpful, not essential, but the others are super important. The people who rise to leadership positions aren’t necessarily the top technical people, they’re the ones who do those things with a good attitude.

      The other thing I’d add is that they’re people who are able to see the big picture and how the details relate to it, which is part of strategic thinking.

    • severien@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’m not sure if the competence is really in the last place. I’d say it’s on the equal level. Great communication and ownership of the problems means little if you can’t really solve the problems.

      • AFK BRB Chocolate (CA version)@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        People have those things in spectrums, not all or nothing. You have to have at least some of all of them, but I’d argue that mediocre competency with really good communication and accountability is a better combination that really good competency with one of the others being mediocre.

        • severien@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          I still kinda disagree. We’re talking here about engineering role after all. I have a colleague who is a code wizard, but has kinda problem with (under)communicating. He’s still widely respected as a very good engineer, people know his communication style and adapt to it.

          But if you’re a mediocre problem solver, you can’t really make up for it with communication skills. That kinda moves you into non-engineering role like PO, SM or perhaps support engineer.

          But I would say this - once you reach a certain high level of competence, then the communication skills, leadership, ownership can become the real differentiating factors. But you can’t really get there without the high level of competence first.

          • raze2012@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            We’re talking here about engineering role after all.

            where? seemed like general advice.

            Even then, thee aren’t mutually exclusive. your competence will affect how people see you on a personal level, at least at work. And your competence affects your ability to be given problems to own. You’re not gonna give the nice but still inexperienced employee to own an important problem domain. they might be able to work under the owner and gain experience, though.

            Documentation and presentation are highly undervalued, and your ability to understand and spread that knowledge can overcome that lack of experience to actually handle the task yourself.

  • incogtino@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    Your employer does not care about you. You are not important or irreplaceable

    Take your time and energy and put it into your life, not their business

    I have had coworkers die (not work related) and by the time you hear about it (like the next day) they have already worked out who will get the work done so the machine doesn’t have to stop

  • Polymath - lemm.ee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    The longer you work anywhere – and I mean ANYWHERE – the more you see the bullshit and corruption and crappy rules or policies and inequality all over.
    For me it has been about the 3 year mark anywhere I’ve worked: once you get past that, you fade away from “damn I’m glad to have a job and be making money!” and towards “this is absolute bulls#!t that [boss] did [thing] and hurt the workers in the process!” or similar

    • speaker_hat@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Thanks, I agree!

      Today businesses increase like mushrooms after rain, and decrease like mushrooms before summer.

      Don’t get attached, move on to the next better mushroom 🍄

  • jbrains@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    There is no ideal place to work where they “do it right”, whatever kind of “right” you care about right now. When you change jobs, you merely exchange one set of problems for another.

    • thedrivingcrooner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Having worked 7 different jobs that all were in the same field made me have some backbone of standards that nobody else could have built without going through that, though. It’s a blessing and a curse, so be warned. The things I picked up on that I never realized I would care so much about in the healthcare field is good office administration and Director of Care leadership. The morale is just as important as the pay rate.

  • Waldowal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    You don’t have to run the rat race to get promoted. You don’t have to be at your desk at 7am and leave at 7pm to put on a show. Just be competent. Most people are not. You’ll eventually get promoted once you are old and white enough.

    • PeachMan@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      It should be noted that this is advice specific to white men in Western countries 😆 but yes, it’s true.

  • Abrslam @sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Sometimes it’s better if your employer doesn’t know everything you can do. If you’re not careful you’ll end up Inventory Controller/shipper/IT services/reception/Safety officer, and you’ll only ever be paid for whatever your initial position was.

    • _TheLoneDeveloper_@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I wanted to be a system engineer, I got hired as a devops, I started doing a bit of system engineer, called hr and said that I’m working on infrastructure and I need my title changed or else I won’t be able to continue my work, my title was changed, no I do system engineer stuff and less of devops, this was a very rare occasion but it can happen from time to time.

  • 77slevin@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    No matter how much you invest you’re time and effort for your job: You are expendable, and the only people who will know you were absent from home because of work 20 years later, will be your kids.

    • Elw@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      100%. The rebranding of some HR departments as “People Officers” or “People Team” drives me bonkers. When push comes to shove, they will always protect the interests of the business before the interests of the employee. Full stop.

  • Elw@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Boundaries. Establish them and defend them with every ounce of your being. If you don’t, most employers will grind you in to the dirt and send you out to pasture when you eventually crack under the pressure. Better to establish healthy boundaries up front. Not only will you find yourself more frequently surrounded by people you like and share mutual respect with, you will be happier and land fewer “shit” jobs because employers looking for people to send to the meat grinder will see that they can’t grind you down and you’ll be filtered from the hiring pool before you ever have to suffer at their hands.

  • Signtist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Efficient workers get more work if you’re in the office. I work from home, and that allows me to work efficiently until my work is done, set up scheduled emails to go out at the time I would’ve otherwise been done, then do what I want until then.

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s a double edged sword. I was very efficient, and did get more work, which got me noticed and eventually promoted out of a doing position into a leading position

      It’s a nice change, the work is light, the people side of the work is easy. I have higher pay and much more free time

  • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yeah, looking busy is way more important than being productive a lot of the time. You always need to be doing something, so you just go through the motions of doing things because otherwise you’ll get shit from your employers. Waiting in good faith for more real tasks to emerge isn’t enough, so you must invent chores.

    At least, that was very consistently my experience in retail.