Gender stereotypes at home may hamper female students’ ability to progress in the classroom, research suggests

Archived version: https://archive.ph/YJ1RU

  • ID411@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    “The more parents overestimate, the higher the level of skills of these children two years later,”

    So……

    • spujb@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      …so women are encountering roadblocks to an education they could get due to social tendencies surrounding gender in education and parenting.

      • ID411@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Maybe…. Though it begs the very obvious question, if people who are overestimated and go on to outperform….doesnt there exist the possibility that they were not overestimated in the first place. ?

        • spujb@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          yes, sure, in a poetic sense, but no in the literal scientific data sense; the article says parents were asked to guess against literal test scores that the kids took

          more research would be needed to examine long term meanings of overestimation, and i’d be careful not to draw conclusions before then

          • ID411@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I would not be prepared to base anything on parents guessing scores with all attendant externalities - and yet that’s what this report is keen to do .

  • Muffi@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Hmm. In my personal experience as a teacher, parents overestimate all skills of their children if their child is talkative and extroverted. The silent children are the ones mostly underestimated. Maybe the girls are generally just more silent and therefore underestimated more?

  • blazeknave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    Chaperoned a trip to a science museum recently and you can feel the shyness/weariness of the little girls to show their excitement. The boys run around doing the fuck they want bc “boys will be boys” as usual.

  • nayminlwin@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    In my country though, it’s the other way around. Girls are seen as more meticulous, systemactic and better with numbers and records.

    A lot accountants and back office workers are all women. Hell, in the company I work for there’s not a single guy in the accounting department and majority are women in other departments like administration, HR and Sales Operation.

  • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    That seems wrong. I underestimate my son’s skills and therefore made him practice more than my daughter who was always in GT math.

    If I had overestimated my son’s math skills, he wouldn’t be doing as well today.

    • Phegan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      I think it’s more an overestimation of their potential and ceiling, therefore they invest more time.

    • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      encouragement and additional advanced math education would go against your argument. E.g. more parents believe their kid is gifted and more of them push their kid or explore opportunities for the kid to get better education in the subject.