• riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    donald trump gets 10 warnings for intimidating witnesses and indefinite trial postponement for hoarding and most likely leaking classified documents. Sweet sweet justice.

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      People keep trying to convince me it’s not evidence of two justice systems.

       

      But it is.

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It’s evidence that we live in corporatocracies masquerading as “democracies”. The 0.1%, shielded by the liability protections of the corporations they own, and their armies of lobbyists — they finance our politics, choose who ends up on the ballot, and shadow write most of our legislation, policies, and regulations.

        Trump is free because he is a part of that < 0.1%.

        The Boeing execs who oversaw systemic fraud, lied to the FAA, and murdered 166 people still ARE FREE AND RICH. Why? Because they are the 0.1%.

        The IPCC hosts fossil fuelled climate summits in fossil fuel exporting countries, inviting fossil fuel corporations and lobbyists to attend — at a scientific conference about how to solve the crisis they created and profited from! why? Because we live in corporatocracies.

        • TotalFat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          If any country’s government spied on its own people as much as big business does in America, people would flip out. But in America, big business really is the government.

          We are so fucked…

      • fossphi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think this is a consequence of any (unregulated) capitalistic system in general. The system is founded on money, more money will give anyone more influence and power over the system

        • seaQueue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s a consequence of our “growth at all costs” take on capitalism. Capitalism is only livable for the average person when it’s kept in check by a strong government and corruption is vigorously prosecuted. We’ve decided that corruption just happens and there’s nothing we can do about it, and so there are no disincentives to corrupting government.

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          This has nothing to do with an economic system. This same shit is worse even in communist systems, and I’m not even going to try and point fingers at that system and say it is.

          The real reason is because of power, and a class system that protects its own.

            • SupraMario@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Correct, no clue why I pointed this out and got downvoted but you say the same thing and get people agreeing with you…guess I should have kept with the “capitalism bad” circle jerk.

              • lol_idk@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                lol you got downvoted because you said something negative about communism on Lemmy

      • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s the subtle difference between a JUSTICE system and a LEGAL system.

        One aims to maintain law and order in society in a fair and equal way regardless of one’s status or situation.

        The other is a system gamed to benefit the richest and wealthiest individuals to get away with everything.

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      With authors often paying for open access publications literally out of their very own money, not just grants.

      • hedgehogging_the_bed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not at the time this happened. Aaron’s case was one of the motivating factors that led to the Open Access publication movement gaining enough traction that authors could publish that way. JSTOR access is paid for and administered on college campuses by libraries and librarians as a whole field felt terrible both about the paid publication system and the way Aaron was treated. As a community of professionals, the Librarian and Information Science community pushed very hard for the adoption of Open Access publishing into the Academic community.

  • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Look, the kid was a hero, but this is also patently false.

    He was not sentenced to 35 years. The trial hadn’t started. 35 years was the maximum possible sentence. He was given a plea deal for 6 months that he rejected.

    We don’t need to spin lies to make his story more tragic than it already is.

    • GluWu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      35 years max, plea for 1/2 that was rejected. He was going to get the book thrown at him to make an example. 5 years minimum but I wouldn’t doubt 10-20.

      The rapist traitor that headed a insurrection on Jan 6 2021 has never spent a day in jail and is still the frontrunner for president to be legally elected in 2024.

  • muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    27 days ago

    This is propaganda he got sucicided. And he didnt transfer or share scientific articles he simply downloaded them thats all. This poat is extremely damaging as its almost correct juat slightly shifting the commonly accepted reality of history. This is not the first time I’ve seen posts about him here doing a simmillar thing this raises the question who’s trying to rewrite history and what for?

  • Omniraptor@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Shout out to Alexandra elbakyan. She continues part of aaron’s work by running sci-hub and libgen, but lives safely out of reach of the american criminal “justice” system 💔

  • Hubi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    He didn’t even share them as far as I know, he just downloaded them. And the trial hadn’t started yet when he committed suicide.

  • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Oil CEOs pay fines for bringing about a global climate catastrophe. Fascist politicians are given slaps on the wrist for an attempted coup d’etat. Government officials openly commit gross violations of privacy and suffer no consequences.

    But a guy hacks a university network and downloads a hoard of scientific articles that should have been freely accessible to begin with and he gets 35 years in prison. I’ll admit I wasn’t familiar with this case before I saw this picture. Which is kind of insane in and of itself.

    • lemmeee@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Remember Kim Dotcom? He had a file sharing website and the police raided his house with guns like he was a dangerous criminal. There is a video of it on YouTube.

  • Melllvar@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s not exactly what happened.

    Aaron committed suicide before his case went to trial, and so he was never convicted let alone sentenced. 35 years was never even likely; had it gone to trial there’s every reason to think he’d have been acquitted outright, or at worst given a slap on the wrist. Not that he should have even been charged, of course.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Well now I’ve got two competing claims, and I can’t believe either one until I see the authoritative history on it

      • thisisnotgoingwell@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        There’s a documentary on YouTube called “The internet’s own boy”, if you want to learn more. Basically, he was offered a 6 month plea, but he would be a convicted felon, and basic logic/morality tells you that you shouldn’t plead guilty to a crime that you didn’t commit. However, the justice system is very imperfect, and often people plead guilty for reduced sentencing even if they’re not guilty. He stood on principle until his legs gave out. they were already in millions spent in attorney fees. Not a shred of justice can be found in how Aaron’s story ended.