conditional_soup@lemm.ee to memes@lemmy.world · 8 months agoreading is hardsocial.photoexternal-linkmessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up1119arrow-down115file-text
arrow-up1104arrow-down1external-linkreading is hardsocial.photoconditional_soup@lemm.ee to memes@lemmy.world · 8 months agomessage-square14fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareintensely_human@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down2·8 months agoHeadlines that don’t convey accurate information are invalid
minus-squareLegionEris [she/her]@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·8 months agoHeadlines can be accurate and incomplete. Headlines can be accurate and unintentionally ambiguous. A headline that conveys the totality of a situation or subject is a tweet.
minus-squareintensely_human@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 months agoYes having read accurate and incomplete headlines — which incidentally is the best information ever gets — is a good basis for commenting on a story. If the headlines aren’t accurate, that’s a problem.
Headlines that don’t convey accurate information are invalid
Headlines can be accurate and incomplete. Headlines can be accurate and unintentionally ambiguous. A headline that conveys the totality of a situation or subject is a tweet.
Yes having read accurate and incomplete headlines — which incidentally is the best information ever gets — is a good basis for commenting on a story.
If the headlines aren’t accurate, that’s a problem.