Lead Lemmy Developer, Dessalines, denying the Tiananmen Square Massacre and praising the Uyghur Genocide

https://sh.itjust.works/post/8419342

Dessalines AKA “parentis_shotgun” on Reddit, is the main Lemmy dev, also the admin of lemmy.ml and lemmygrad.ml.

Their post and discussions on Reddit (archive as the original post must have been removed):

https://web.archive.org/web/20230626055233/https://old.reddit.com/r/communism/comments/cqgztr/fuck_the_white_supremacist_reddit_admins_want_me/

Please join the discussions for Lemmy.ml tankie censorship problem:

https://lemmy.world/post/16211417

And the discussions for finding/creating alternative communities on other instances:

https://lemmy.world/post/16235541

What is a tankie?

Tankie is a pejorative label generally applied to authoritarian communists, especially those who support acts of repression by such regimes or their allies. More specifically, the term has been applied to those who express support for one-party Marxist–Leninist socialist republics, whether contemporary or historical.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tankie

  • Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    As I said, protectionism may coexist or not coexist with communism, as it can with any other economic system.

    If you’re serious about equating protectionism and communism, you should probably be happy with the way things were done in the Third Reich.

    You should seriously reconsider the terms you employ, and read the classics more thoroughly. Also, open the goddamn Wikipedia if you’re too lazy for that.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      protectionism may coexist or not coexist with communism

      Only if you ignore the history of anti-colonialism that gave birth to communist movements in the third world.

      If you’re serious about equating protectionism and communism, you should probably be happy with the way things were done in the Third Reich.

      That’s utterly ahistorical. There was nothing protectionist about Nazi Germany.

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        No, I just state the fact that protectionism doesn’t mean communism and globalism doesn’t mean capitalism.

        They are different terms for a reason.

        There was everything protectionist about Nazi Germany, who seeked to give control of German industries to German capitalists.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          protectionism doesn’t mean communism and globalism doesn’t mean capitalism

          Capitalism requires an economic frontier for continuous growth, which necessitates extraterritorial expansion. Communism requires home rule and self-sufficient domestic industry, which necessitates protectionism.

          They are different terms for a reason.

          One describes a broad philosophy and the other describes a tool of policy. Might as well say Plumber and Pipe are different terms for a reason.

          • Allero@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Communism does not necessitate self-sufficiency, moreover, a switch to fully domestic production is detrimental to any economy. The reason modern economy is globalized is that it’s simply more efficient, and capitalist economies are all about efficiency, as it allows to extract more value. At the same time, many past socialist economies were forced to only partner with other socialist economies, which limited their options and hurt their economy.

            One of the key reasons communist classics called for a global revolution is to gain the critical mass of communism-aligned countries to minimize this effect and maximize globalization efforts. The communist endgame is one interconnected world without any nations to begin with, not to mention any protectionism.

            That’s all, like, economics 101.

              • Allero@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                I don’t think you did read Marx, Engels, and Lenin.

                Can’t say for Mao, did not read his works close enough.

                But the communism classics would strongly disagree with you; besides, you stray so so far from the original topic.