• TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I don’t mind billionaires existing, but I absolutely mind them getting special treatment and getting away with crimes.

    edit: if you’re mad about this comment, I have to think you’re just jealous of the rich assholes. If billionaires paid their fair share of taxes and were prosecuted for crimes, the world would be objectively a better place. Instead, I guess for some that’s not enough, it’s a fully socialist world or NOTHING.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I never said fuck-all about what should exist. I said “I don’t mind [with an important caveat]”. Indicating that I’d prefer a step toward equality than a less realistic absolutist approach to it

        • Patapon Enjoyer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          There can be no billionaires without inequality. If you’re ok with billionaires existing, you’re ok with inequality.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Right. Absolutism is the only way.

            Humanity will destroy itself because of this mind virus. All or nothing. Destroys lives at every level and it will lead to our extinction. But go ahead and embrace it. Because you’re RIGHT, after all.

            • Allero@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              A genuine attempt at civil discussion:

              What you’re pointed at is that, unless the world’s GDP suddenly skyrockets millions of percents, we can’t make everyone a billionaire.

              And if only select few can be billionaires, this is inequality.

              Thereby, what is suggested is to redistribute money more evenly so that non-billionaires (i.e. pretty much everyone) could enjoy a better life, as opposed to few people buying their second golden toilet for the sake of it.

              • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                I’m not sure I follow. Thanks for seemingly being non-reactionary though.

                If I could wave a magic wand, I’d first come up with some new form of socialism where maybe not everyone is 100% equal, but where literally everyone would get to live a fully comfortable life without fear of death or suffering. They’d get to take extended vacations and have fully paid healthcare. No starvation and no being limited to the shittiest food available. Maybe some people could have more than that, if they accomplished something to justify it.

                Since I don’t have that magic wand, I’d just settle for billionaires paying equal percentages of taxes and being jailed when they break the law.

                Apparently, suggesting the latter, for a lot of these commenters, means that I am a huge capitalist who loves inequality. Because I couldn’t possibly recognize that capitalism is both a huge piece of shit in practice but also does provide motivation to workers.

                • Zacryon@lemmy.wtf
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  that capitalism […] does provide motivation to workers

                  I wonder how all of those people in other civilisations survived which didn’t had a capitalistic system.

                  In other words: I hope you’re aware that capitalism is not the only way to motivate people to do stuff. As if people weren’t interested in ensuring their survival or even progress.