Patrick Breyer, a staunch defender of digital rights, laments the Pirate Party’s exit from the EU Parliament as a blow to online privacy.

  • teolan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    Yeah, the greens had a risk of not getting 5% so it was much more worthwhile to vote for them.

      • raldone01@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        There may be even better voting systems but 3-2-1 would be a nice change. This way strategic voting gets at least somewhat mitigated and might force people to actually invest some time and look at the agenda of some other parties too because they have to vote for 3 parties.

        • tabular@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          There are voting systems that completely prevent the need for tactical voting (e.g. instant-runoff voting, aka alternative vote) but if the system still trends towards having two main parties then not much has really changed.

          A bigger issue is that a single candidate/party is not very good at representing an area in comparison to having more (3, 5, ideally more). If people vote 80% A and 20% B and A gets the single candidate then 20% are misrepresented. With 5 candidates then that could be split 4 to A and 1 to B, a perfect representation.