• frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    They very likely was someone named Jesus, because there were many people with that name.

    The second one doesn’t use that name. Read the sources.

    There’s 0 evidence or recorded documentation that a resurrection ever happened. That’s the big one.

    Well of course, but that’s common sense. Dead people stay dead as a rule.

      • frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        There’s 0 evidence or recorded documentation that a resurrection ever happened. That’s the big one.

        The question in question was “Is there any real physical proof that Jesus christ ever existed?”

        • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          Jesus Christ is very specific. Jesus Christ, the son of God, who was crucified and rose again on the third day… that is fake.

          • frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            Well that’s an entirely different question. Entirely different field.

            “the son of God, who was crucified and rose again on the third day” is for silly Christians.

            The question under discussion here is about Roman-era history.

            • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              6 days ago

              You suck ass at reading. The title of this post is asking about “Jesus Christ,” which we all know to mean the son of God and the guy that resurrected after 3 days.

              • frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                What do you think of what Ehrman says here at 1h45m25s that the mythicist theory isn’t taken seriously by the academy because it’s mostly pushed by people who seem eager to dunk on religion.

              • frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                The title of this post is asking about “Jesus Christ,” which we all know to mean the son of God and the guy that resurrected after 3 days.

                lol no… this thread is not talking about anything like that hahaha. Read it.

                Obviously people don’t come back from the dead or transform into cheddar cheese; we don’t need historical research to tell us that.

                His given name was יֵשׁוּעַ‎ or Yeshua, which is Jesus in one speech-type, عيسى (ʿIsà) in another, as well as a lot of other variants.

                ‘Christus’ in Latin seems to refer to the same person; Tacitus wrote “called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus”