• k110111@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Controversial opinion: whats the point of stonehenge if there is no humanity? Its not like it fosters some ecosystem or smth for other species, its a historical piece which holds sentimental value to us humans.

    If we continue to use oil, we will for sure fuck up humanity. The act was controversial but the message needs to be looked at

    • Flax@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      We’re not going to die from climate change. Screw up the environment? Sure. But humans have the capability to literally live in space, on the moon, and soon enough, mars.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        *while supported from Earth.

        We don’t have second Earth to be supported from.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      If we’re assuming that humanity will go extinct, then sure there’s no point to stonehenge. But then there’s also no point to a protest either.

      If we’re assuming humanity isn’t going extinct, then there is a point to preserving stonehenge and there’s also a point to having these protests.

      Seems like there’s a logic fail happening here where there’s no point to preserving stone henge for the future but there is still a point to a protest about preserving things for the future.

        • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          There’s zero chance that protesting Stonehenge will improve the future, they’re just rocks.

          Protesting an oil refinery might have better odds tho.

          • Sethayy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Zero change is pretty damn impressive confidence intervals, and oil refineries are much easier to cover things up/rewrite the story at

            • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Even easier to rewrite history when someone is attacking something like Stonehenge. “Just a bunch of idiots that don’t really care about the problem, they’re just trying to get attention for themselves.” And is that all that far from the truth? IT is 100% about getting attention the only thing that’s debatable is whether it’s attention for the cause or attention for themselves.

              The problem isn’t that people don’t know global warming exists, the problem is they don’t care. Sure, being an asshole gets you attention, but it doesn’t influence anyone to help with a cause. So whatever their intent, these kinds of actions are just selfish attention seeking.

              • Sethayy@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                So you want them to break into a secure facility and probably get federal charges instead of some rocks?

                Cause these rocks are special rocks to you?