• justastranger@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    168
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s like every time there’s a war everybody forgets how fucking long they take. WW2 took six years. The Vietnam War took almost 20 years, same with the Afghanistan War. Anybody expecting anything solid within the next couple years is delusional. Ukraine is in it for the long haul.

  • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    130
    arrow-down
    39
    ·
    10 months ago

    You know what? I never thought I’d say this but I’m with Ukraine on this one.

    This whole counter offensive insanity is so militarily nonsensical that it had to have been mounted to please the West with a “win” so that they’d stay in the war. Real Chiang Kai Shek committing the best of the KMT army to Shanghai to impress the Westerners energy.

    The West is standing on the sidelines, supplying just enough equipment to keep the embers going and judging the ordinary Ukrainians going to their deaths by their hundreds.

    Fuck the clowns in charge in Kiev and fuck the Nazi militias obviously. But at this point the men being sent to the front are old men and boys dragged off the street against their will. Sending them to die to appease the West is fucking sick.

    • LeFantome@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      10 months ago

      This got an upvote?

      Are you open to proposing your master plan?

      Ukraine has been invaded. Are you suggesting they do not fight back?

      NATO is not war. No NATO country has been attacked. Engaging against Russia directly would put NATO at war with a nuclear power. I cannot imagine that this is your plan.

      Not just “the West”, but everybody is on the sidelines as far as direct engagement goes. Most countries are assisting Ukraine where they can. Some to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars. Most have imposed crippling sanctions. So. “sidelines” is a bit misleading from that perspective.

      Even Russia’s allies are “on the sidelines”. You certainly do not see much overt support from China. They have even maintained ( in fact stepped-up ) diplomatic relation with Ukraine.

      Or are you trying to imply that the underlying cause of everything here is something other than Russia’s continued invasion? Everybody could truly go back to the sidelines if Russia just left.

      The only other path is for Ukraine to win. Are you supporting that or not?

      • rubpoll [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        102
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        If your goal is to prevent deaths, surrendering would have been the ideal yeah.

        Zelenksy tried to surrender to prevent further deaths, and Boris Johnson refused to let that meeting happen because NATO isn’t finished using Ukranians as crash test dummies.

        • GivingEuropeASpook [they/them, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          If your goal is to prevent deaths, surrendering would have been the ideal yeah.

          This has literally never been true in any war ever. Foreign occupations rarely tend to be bloodless and I doubt a Russian one would have been an exception. At no point were any of the peace talks about Ukraine’s surrender – only renouncing it’s NATO ambitions in exchange for the withdrawal of Russian troops, as per:

          https://www.commondreams.org/news/2022/05/06/boris-johnson-pressured-zelenskyy-ditch-peace-talks-russia-ukrainian-paper

          “In the weeks ahead of Johnson’s April 9 visit, high-level diplomatic talks held in Belarus and Turkey had failed to yield a diplomatic breakthrough, though reports in mid-March indicated that Russian and Ukrainian delegations “made significant progress” toward a 15-point peace deal that would involve Ukraine renouncing its NATO ambitions in exchange for the withdrawal of Moscow’s troops.”

          At no point was surrender on the table - that would have likely lead to Zelenksy’s detention and execution in the early days of the invasion.

          • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            I don’t think Zelensky was too keen on capitulating to Vladimir Putin’s demands to destroy his country, after sending in GRU hit squads to kill him and his family multiple times at the outset of the war.

        • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Zelenskyy tried to surrender and Boris Johnson stopped him?! Ooooookay… He maaaybe (all “unnamed” sources) expressed an opinion, which the U.K. learnt the hard way, that you cannot negotiate with dictators. There can be no “peace in our time” with dictators hellbent on destruction.

          To cast that as “Ukraine was stopped from surrendering” is just obscene … and yet another Kremlin talking point.

          • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            80
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            which the U.K. learnt the hard way, that you cannot negotiate with dictators. There can be no “peace in our time” with dictators hellbent on destruction.

            If the UK is convinced that you can’t negotiate with dictators, how does the UK keep entering into arms sales agreements with Saudi Arabia? Do the contracts just appear out of thin air at BAE?

            • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Sigh.

              I am referencing to a dictator that is hellbent on invasion of other countries. We had plenty of relations with Russia before they decided to invade Ukraine and they were a dictatorship before. We have plenty of relationships with China now and they are a de facto dictatorship.

              • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                88
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                The Saudis used their British weapons to bomb Yemen and create one of the worst humanitarian catastrophes in recent memory. The UK sold weapons to Saudi before, during, and after the Saudi involvement in Yemen.

                Perhaps Russia should have merely bombed Ukraine to the point of starvation. Then they’d be a good dictatorship that the UK would be happy to carry out business negotiations with.

                • Adkml [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  72
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Don’t be ridiculous

                  Ukrainians are white

                  That’s only acceptable when it’s brown, asian, or south american people who’s country you’re destroying.

                • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  What’s going on in Yemen is incredibly complicated. I’m not condoning everything Saudi Arabia is doing there, far from it, but to call it out as a good vs evil war is frankly a simpleton view. Saudi is bad there. Everyone is bad there. It’s a huge mess. But I think it’s important to recognise that the Saudis aim is to restore order in a neighbourhood country, to prevent Iranian influence from growing and to suppress violent Islamic fundamentalism.

              • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                58
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                I am referencing to a dictator that is hellbent on invasion of other countries

                Yemen isn’t a country because it isn’t white enough for you

          • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            61
            ·
            10 months ago

            Russia and Ukraine may have agreed on a tentative deal to end the war in April, according to a recent piece in Foreign Affairs.

            “Russian and Ukrainian negotiators appeared to have tentatively agreed on the outlines of a negotiated interim settlement,” wrote Fiona Hill and Angela Stent. “Russia would withdraw to its position on February 23, when it controlled part of the Donbas region and all of Crimea, and in exchange, Ukraine would promise not to seek NATO membership and instead receive security guarantees from a number of countries.”

            The news highlights the impact of former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s efforts to stop negotiations, as journalist Branko Marcetic noted on Twitter. The decision to scuttle the deal coincided with Johnson’s April visit to Kyiv, during which he reportedly urged Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to break off talks with Russia for two key reasons: Putin cannot be negotiated with, and the West isn’t ready for the war to end.

            Foreign Affairs is a Kremlin propaganda outlet now?

      • Calavera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        81
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        What do you mean by not just the west?

        We have almost zero countries on Asia, Africa and Latin America which have sanctioned Russia or sent military aid to Ukraine

        This is just related to nato/Europe/global north countries.

        Europe is not the whole world

      • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        77
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        10 months ago

        Ukraine has plenty of opportunities to win. It could have chosen to chart a more balanced position between the EU and Russia. It could have given the Donbass some independence referenda and just let them go. It could have actually tried to adhere to the numerous Minsk Agreements to deescalate and prevent war. It could have negotiated for peace while the Russians were pulling back after its previously more successful counter offensives.

        But each time its leaders ignored the off ramp to peace and pursued delusional maximalist goals, egged on by promises of EU and NATO membership which even Zelensky acknowledged publically were just carrots dangled in front of Ukraine.

        Now there’s no pathway to any sort of Ukrainian victory and the most realistic scenarios all involve Ukraine permanently giving up Donbas and Crimea. The only difference between the likely outcome now and just giving them a referendum in 2014 is a couple hundred thousand Ukrainian graves.

        I’d respect the EU and NATO more if they had actually followed through with their promises to Ukraine instead of this Charlie Brown football bullshit.

        • ThereRisesARedStar [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          68
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Ukraine has plenty of opportunities to win. It could have chosen to chart a more balanced position between the EU and Russia.

          I mean they tried to but they got couped by the US for their troubles.

          • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            78
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            It rules that libs constantly appeal to public opinion of people in Taiwan as an argument for why China should let it be independent but as soon as people from a Western aligned country want to exercise that same self-determination its “surrendering” to let them have a referendum.

            Totally an intellectually coherent ideology and not just “our team (good), your team (bad)”.

          • Łumało [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            67
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Your comment makes me want to see a fan cut of Captain America where he just gets the shit beaten out of him and his limbs ripped off and he dies and every five minutes “I can do this all day” but it never turns around and he fucking dies. He never appears to make a come back. He just keeps getting his ass kicked and never stops saying the line. Except it’s not his ass getting kicked, it’s some random children he took off the street and forced to be child soldiers or he’d kill them. And he just keeps saying “I can do this all day” while tens of thousands of people keep getting killed and not once for any reason or goal that progress is made towards. Just tens of thousands of dead bodies every month. “I can do this all day” except he’s not even there he’s on an internet forum. It’s still tens of thousand of dead bodies but not his. And he’ll never give up. But he’ll never get any closer to winning. Just death to countless people who aren’t him. He can do it all day. And every time he says it you can tell he feels really cool and badass. He’s Captain America. He doesn’t quit just because it looks bad.

          • ThereRisesARedStar [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            53
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Neither of these things he describes are surrendering:

            It could have given the Donbass some independence referenda and just let them go. It could have actually tried to adhere to the numerous Minsk Agreements to deescalate and prevent war.

            In fact both of them would have prevented Russia from annexing donbass. They would be independent territories that would act as a buffer state between the two countries.

            • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              42
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              I was coming at it from the sense of both outcomes being the same (Ukraine losing Donbas) but in one scenario Ukraine “wins” because it doesn’t get bombed and lose hundreds of thousands of people, but you raise a great point. There was a chance that letting Donbas go in 2014 would have resulted in a fairly neutral buffer with Russia.

              There was a point where the DPR and LPR were just seeking autonomy within Ukraine to speak Russian and decide local issues but the hardliners in Kiev decided to sic Nazis on them instead.

          • Right, but it’s not like every country not filled out in green is actively supporting Russia in the same way. In terms of countries supplying Russia the way the US, NATO, and the EU are supplying Ukraine, I’m pretty sure it’s just Iran and North Korea. The US has largely failed to isolate Russia the way it wanted to, but Russia hasn’t been able to get the kind of support from its allies that Ukraine has (like, unless there have been some Chinese Type 99s tanks spotted in operation by the Russians that I hadn’t heard about, I’m not exactly tracking the front every day).

            • SixSidedUrsine [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              20
              ·
              10 months ago

              but Russia hasn’t been able to get the kind of [material] support from its allies that Ukraine has

              It hasn’t needed to. Ukraine wouldn’t be a functional state at all by this point were it not for the tens of billions of dollars in aid as well as all the military equipment slowly depleting the west. Russia on the other hand, has been doing quite well in holding it’s own economically despite the sanctions and in holding the literal defensive line against all the NATO weaponry. It’s a nonsensical comparison to make.

              • It hasn’t needed to

                They’ve taken arms and supplies from Iran and are currently negotiating with the DPRK. Yes, Russia is bigger and can theoretically out-last Ukraine in a war of attrition on a 1:1 basis, but you shouldn’t be hoping for something that prolongs the war.

                It’s a nonsensical comparison to make.

                So is using a map of the countries supporting Ukraine to insinuate that the all the other countries must therefore be on Russia’s side.

                • SixSidedUrsine [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  but you shouldn’t be hoping for something that prolongs the war./

                  lol, what do you think I’m “hoping” for? Stating the fact that Russia can easily do what it has been doing indefinitely (but Ukraine cannot) has nothing to do with my hopes.

                  So is using a map of the countries supporting Ukraine to insinuate that the all the other countries must therefore be on Russia’s side.

                  No one ever did any such thing, just noted that support comes in many forms other than military equipment, which Russia has mostly already covered for itself, even if it buys drone parts from Iran. Unlike Ukraine which now relies wholly and entirely on outside help for all of its material need. You changed the goalposts for what “support” means to make it sound like only military equipment counts as support, which is foolish because it isn’t what Russia needs. You’re just trying to move the goalposts all over the place to make it seem like you have some kind of valid point, but you don’t. Even if countries are not sending unneeded tanks, Russia still has plenty of support all over the world, mostly from countries who rightly recognize this as a struggle against the imperialism of the US and NATO which is beneficial to any anti-imperialists (including any actual leftists, even though so many western “leftists” drink deeply of their overlord’s propaganda).

              • In what way? I think a lot of people are acting like anyone not actively sending arms or money to Ukraine must therefore be “supporting” Russia. Has the Saudi Arabian Kingdom given any weapons to Russia? Have they given any loans to plug the holes in the national budget while the country engages in open warfare? Or are they just viewing a European conflict as irrelevant to their own aims and goals?

      • s0ykaf [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        50
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Most countries are assisting Ukraine where they can.

        lmao here i am living in a 200 million people country where nobody gives a single fuck about ukraine

        even more political groups and discussions rarely involve ukraine except when lula decides to own zelensky in some way, no one here cares about nato’s proxy war

        • even more political groups and discussions rarely involve ukraine except when lula decides to own zelensky in some way, no one here cares about nato’s proxy war

          I mean why should they? Brazil as a country (you mention lula, so) isn’t in NATO so it doesn’t have an ideological reason to support Russia or Ukraine in the matter. There’s nothing to be gained geographically for Brazil either, since whoever controls Kyiv doesn’t directly impact any strategic concerns for Brazil afaik.

          You say no one cares, so while I think most people in Canada and US hope that Ukraine “wins”, does that mean apathy in that regard or would you say most people are passively hoping Russia achieves its war goals?

          • s0ykaf [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            i think most people here are just apathetic towards it, yea

            as for smaller, more involved groups, you have the english-speaking libs and the middle class which are just nyt-brained to the core (on every single issue, so you can guess their opinions), and the communists and PT libs (with opinions that are pretty close to ours: “war is bad, putin is shit, and we should stay away from the whole thing, but hopefully the end result of this one is a weaker, and not a stronger, american/nato empire”)

            • the communists and PT libs (with opinions that are pretty close to ours: “war is bad, putin is shit, and we should stay away from the whole thing, but hopefully the end result of this one is a weaker, and not a stronger, american/nato empire”)

              All sounds very reasonable, tbh even the libs and middle-class positions make sense to me if they are plugged into the same media as US libs.

  • thecodemonk@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    10 months ago

    The comment threads here are weird. Who, in their right mind, would ever support a country like Russia? It’s mind blowing.

  • Fuckass [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    103
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    10 months ago

    “The Ghost of Kyiv is still training with the F-35 you sent us,” President Zelenskyy told a Pentagon advisor who criticized the counter-offensive. “This is your people’s job. Either shut up, or provide better instructors.”

    Wow. Zelensky isn’t playing. He means business

  • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    101
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    There sure are a lot of Lemmy bro-gaders and NATO shillbots in this thread. That’s the only explanation for people disagreeing with me.
    smuglord

    • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      96
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      Are the Hexbear users who are saying Ukraine is being ungrateful repeating Kremlin propaganda or are the Hexbear users who are saying Ukraine has a point repeating Kremlin propaganda?

      Is Kremlin propaganda just ontologically what a Hexbear user says?

      • 𝔊𝔦𝔫𝔧𝔲𝔱𝔰𝔲@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m referring to the concerning number of users from your instance who seem obsessed with parroting what has been confirmed to be Kremlin propaganda and lies spread through deliberate misinformation campaigns. Obviously, this isn’t all HexBear users, but you guys clearly have a general problem with this kind of stuff.

          • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            72
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            They never respond with actual examples.

            Edit: Lmao they’ve responded with a post that points out Ukraine has been killing people in the Donbas before the war started and a post that highlights the many offramps to the current conflict

          • 𝔊𝔦𝔫𝔧𝔲𝔱𝔰𝔲@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Do you seriously have to ask?

            This post wasn’t difficult to find.

            Acting as if ending the war is Ukraine’s responsibility, rather than one of the country engaging in a literal invasion.

            Anyone who doesn’t take the 2014 referendum with an extreme grain of salt is slotting nicely into Russia’s current playbook.

            I seriously don’t understand why so many of you dickride Russia, other than “west bad”. The current Russian government is antithetical to so many of the values you claim to champion.

            https://hexbear.net/comment/3865920

            Here’s another for the road.

            EDIT:

            Numerous comments people claiming that the Maidan Revolution was actually a US backed coup, with zero evidence provided outside of Kremlin and state operated mouthpieces of course.

            Possibly the most egregious yet: apparently the Bucha massacre was a hoax. Remember all those videos we saw of Russian soldiers gunning down unarmed civilians? Apparently they all must have been doctored, or were actually Ukrainian soldiers dressed up as Russian soldiers gunning down their own people.

            One of my close friends is a Ukrainian photographer/videographer who was among the first on the scene after the Russians left Bucha. You’ve very likely seen some of his photos before. I can only imagine the rage he’d feel if he were to read some of the bullshit that these comments are attempting to spread.

            Honestly, my opinion of HexBear has reached a new low after this thread. I used to be against defederation, but now I can at least understand why people don’t want to be associated at all with your instance.

            EDIT 2: This post was locally removed on HexBear. I think that says enough on its own.

            • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              54
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              10 months ago

              So a post that highlights the many offramps to the current conflict, and describes how Ukraine can no longer “win” is Kremlin propaganda?
              The other is a post that describes that Ukraine has killed civilians in the Donbass under Zelensky, do you dispute this?

            • SnAgCu [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              51
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              I see this one a lot.

              I seriously don’t understand why so many of you dickride Russia, other than “west bad”. The current Russian government is antithetical to so many of the values you claim to champion.

              Seriously, who? Who is “dickriding Russia because west bad”? The current state of Russia is the result of the USSR’s undemocratic dissolution and the subsequent shock doctrine, obviously it’s antithetical to our values. Everyone knows that. People aren’t being blinded by “west bad” - because they generally aren’t literal children who can only understand the world in terms of good guys and bad guys. What they’re doing is critically analyzing media and history.

              Hate to employ the dreaded whataboutism, but it seems to me this critique applies more to the opposite side. You say people are “Slotting nicely into Russia’s playbook”, “parroting Kremlin propaganda”. On their own, these are empty thought-terminators. You’re not concerned about understanding reality, just about making absolutely sure you’re 100% not on “Russia’s side” of this issue, because they’re the bad guys in this dichotomy.

              I seriously don’t understand why so many of you dickride the west, other than “Russia bad”. The current western governments are antithetical to so many of the values you claim to champion.

              • VentraSqwal@links.dartboard.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                You guys say that but I’ve never seen a hexbear criticizing Russia or their side of the story, only accept it as gospel. You say you don’t do that but then blindly accept their time line for the Bucha massacre or pretend their reasons for attacking a sovereign nation are real or ignore a bunch of irregularities in their 2014 referendum voting. Russia leaving is apparently never an option when they talk about possible solutions, only Ukraine giving up territory. You say the world isn’t only good guys and bad guys but because when the things you guys say are actually analyzed, it’s obvious that it’s a lie. The west is bad, everyone else is less bad. Therefore in any thread with Ukraine, because the west is on their side, they are the bad guys. Even though Russia also has a corruption problem and Nazi problem and has a history of invading their numbers for decades. But they have the bigger military, so I guess all their neighbors have to give up their best territory to Russia for free and their citizens shouldn’t expect to do anything about it and the the rest of the world has to let them.

                Meanwhile, many of the people who criticize Russia in this attack don’t dickride the West at all and hate plenty of things about it and will say it in the same thread or tons of others. Like they should definitely decide whether they’ll fully support Ukraine or not, but we all know that to do that they’d have to get more support from their voters, which is often more difficult said than done, especially since Ukraine isn’t actually in NATO.

                • 🏳️‍⚧️Edward [it/its]@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Russia leaving is apparently never an option when they talk about possible solutions

                  Yes… it isn’t. Thats how reality works. Russia isn’t going to just up and leave. They aren’t going to have thousands of their own people killed and then just… nothing. They have goals, they want to meet them, and if not then at least get somewhat of a victory. The people in Russia aren’t going to like “oh, we just left”. I don’t fucking understand how people can say “the war ends when russia [just up and leaves]”. This isn’t fantasy land, that isn’t how it works. Russia will leave, if Ukraine negotiates a peace with them. If Russia wants land then UK has to negotiate for that not to happen.

            • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              49
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              10 months ago

              You claim that these are examples of “confirmed Kremlin propaganda”. What sources and/or authorities confirm the opinions contained in these posts as Kremlin propaganda?

            • sharedburdens [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              26
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              10 months ago
              spoiler

              I seriously don’t understand why so many of you dickride Russia

              love how liberals manage to weave in casual homophobia whenever geopolitics comes up, you people make me sick

              It’s not because of blind allegiance to Russia or anything like that, people have positions counter to your narrative as the result of actually paying attention to events, as they’ve unfolded, over years.

              Impressive how mad you babies get when people don’t swallow the lies you’re peddling, expecting them to be taken as implicitly true or something.

              • VentraSqwal@links.dartboard.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Talk about swallowing lies after regurgitating Russian propaganda? You are all blinded yourself by your hate for the US that you are willing to deny massacres or genocides.

                • sharedburdens [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  What Russian propaganda? I live in the US, I have more of a problem with my government than a government on the other side of the planet, no matter how scary the liberals try to make them sound.

        • Krause [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          74
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          10 months ago

          parroting what has been confirmed to be Kremlin propaganda

          Ah yes, Kremlin propaganda that is being spread around by… THE UKRAINIAN GOVERNMENT!

          💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀

    • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      94
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      10 months ago

      Libs and calling responding to a post that pops up on our feed “brigading”
      Libs and calling claims with citations and references “propaganda”

            • SeventyTwoTrillion [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              62
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              you don’t really have to support Putin per se, many of us including myself would feel glee watching him be put up against a wall by communist revolutionaries, but supporting NATO is a pretty big dealbreaker given NATO’s imperialist and fascist history. e.g. Several Nazi German officials being put into NATO’s government. Gladio and funding of fascist stay-behind groups in the event of Soviet invasion. Yugoslavia. Libya. I certainly want NATO to be destroyed, hopefully from within rather than without to prevent nuclear war, and unfortunately for us, the reactionary state of Russia seems to be the best bet to maybe have that eventually occur.

              also, stop calling things “wars of aggression” unless you’re going to call everything a war of aggression, my god. what an annoying thought-terminating cliche.

            • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              46
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Absolutely nobody has said that except you.

              Very typical lib talking point though. What socialist spaces do you get your news and information from? Any at all? Or do you just immerse yourself in liberal spaces then end up repeating everything they say and wonder why socialists all call you a liberal? Serious question btw. What socialist media and socialist spaces do you actually participate in and follow? How can you possibly consider yourself to have gotten rid of the liberal brainworms you’ve had your entire life if you continue to immerse yourself within the liberal superstructure?

              • 𝔊𝔦𝔫𝔧𝔲𝔱𝔰𝔲@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                10 months ago

                I think you all made things pretty clear when you consider that the only thing I’ve actually done here is make it clear that I don’t support Russia in this war and am being blasted for being a “lib” for doing so.

                You’re being delusional. I don’t owe you anything.

            • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              20
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              There’s a lot of gendered turns of phrases, which doesn’t necessarily make them acceptable. I make a lot of mistakes myself it’s alright, it’s what happens.

            • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              it’s a turn of phrase.

              Wait until you find out that “go off queen” is also a thing. I wonder why “go off king” and “go off queen” has to both exist. Could it be that this idiomatic expression is a gendered one and that using the expression on someone who doesn’t identify with that gender is a form of misgendering?

              • I haven’t seen either of these phrases, but in my experience even when something is supposed to be the equivalent versions of each other, it somehow feels different to hear and say. Like, it feels alright to call my group of friends “bros” but not “sisses.” Could it be that “go off queen” and “go off king” have different connotations despite the fact that they should mean the same thing?

                • The reason that one version of the “go off” phrase (identical in every way to the other except for one word that specifies gender) might feel to you like it has different connotations is because we live in a patriarchal society that doesn’t assign value the same across all genders. That’s not an excuse to use the version of that phrase which misgenders someone.

                  And your example is really weird and obscures what’s actually at issue. The difference in meaning between the words “bros” and “sissies” goes way beyond just a difference in gender. One is a common and generally affectionate term that men call each other when being friendly. The other is most often used as misogynistic term to insult men by disparaging their masculinity.

            • rjs001@lemmygrad.ml
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              You support a Nazi country that works with imperialists. You aren’t a socialist, but nothing more than a Fox News watching liberal

    • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      79
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      It’s the second post on our /all/ page?

      You’ve all got to get used to the way federation works. Because everyone is federated with different instances the /all/ page is different for different instances. This means that when a thread reaches /all/ on a specific instance you will get a lot of their users showing up at the same time. This is true of all the large instances, lemm.ee and lemmy.ml pour into our threads all at once when they reach the top of their feeds, but it’s different for every site so you get this outcome where a lot happens all at once.

        • ThereRisesARedStar [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          73
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          During the cold war, the anticommunist ideological framework could transform any data about existing communist societies into hostile evidence. If the Soviets refused to negotiate a point, they were intransigent and belligerent; if they appeared willing to make concessions, this was but a skillful ploy to put us off our guard. By opposing arms limitations, they would have demonstrated their aggressive intent; but when in fact they supported most armament treaties, it was because they were mendacious and manipulative. If the churches in the USSR were empty, this demonstrated that religion was suppressed; but if the churches were full, this meant the people were rejecting the regime’s atheistic ideology. If the workers went on strike (as happened on infrequent occasions), this was evidence of their alienation from the collectivist system; if they didn’t go on strike, this was because they were intimidated and lacked freedom. A scarcity of consumer goods demonstrated the failure of the economic system; an improvement in consumer supplies meant only that the leaders were attempting to placate a restive population and so maintain a firmer hold over them. If communists in the United States played an important role struggling for the rights of workers, the poor, African-Americans, women, and others, this was only their guileful way of gathering support among disfranchised groups and gaining power for themselves. How one gained power by fighting for the rights of powerless groups was never explained. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy, so assiduously marketed by the ruling interests that it affected people across the entire political spectrum.

        • loutr@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          10 months ago

          That’s usually how echo chambers and brigading work, yes.

          Not saying you are, don’t really care either way.

    • ScienceBear [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      Daily reminder that we all see this pop up on our feed too and you’re going to have a higher quantity of people from other federated instances commenting by virtue of their being more of them active. No one is getting pings telling them it’s time to go to X thread and post Y take, that’s just a main character mindset people get into when they want to think they’re the underdog and the ‘other side’ isn’t playing fair.

    • Gyoza Power@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      It’s funny seeing the replies to your comment crying about “not brigading” but then the vast majority of the comments in this post come from hexbear users commenting tankie shit

        • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          33
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Lack of self awareness = when something is on our /all/ page ???

          And why aren’t you responding to anything? So much for being a socialist, you have zero engagement with anything other than liberal beliefs and do absolutely nothing to defend your position or challenge yourself.

          • 𝔊𝔦𝔫𝔧𝔲𝔱𝔰𝔲@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Lol, I’ve responded to plenty. Do you seriously expect me to respond to each of the 100+ comments that have been left by HexBear users? It’s not like any of you are capable of changing your mind about anything. Waste of time.

            • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              30
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Yes? What do you think challenging yourself is?

              Answer my points on your nationalist brainworms being completely at odds with any assessment of yourself as “socialist” at the very least.

              • 𝔊𝔦𝔫𝔧𝔲𝔱𝔰𝔲@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                10 months ago

                Lol, chill TF out. I have much better things to do than spend hours arguing with weirdos on Lemmy.

                And again, all I have done is said that I support Ukraine. I also happen to be a socialist. Why is that so hard for you to wrap your head around?

                • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  31
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  And again, all I have done is said that I support Ukraine. I also happen to be a socialist. Why is that so hard for you to wrap your head around?

                  Because you don’t support the people, you support the bourgeois state and your position boils down to “I am willing to kill hundreds of thousands of people to protect it.”

                  This is not socialist ideology. This is first and foremost nationalism, which variant of it I am as yet uncertain as you’ve said nothing about what your “socialism” entails. I am unable to assess whether you’re a nazi or a plain old liberal that pretends to be a socialist by saying you like welfare while still completely and totally supporting capitalism and liberal institutional design to maintain the bourgeoisie as the ruling class. The german gothic aesthetic you choose for your username certainly doesn’t help the suspicions I have over what you really are though, literally retvrn.

                • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  22
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Lol, chill TF out. I have much better things to do than spend hours arguing with weirdos on Lemmy.

                  Then why have you spent hours arguing with weirdos on Lemmy?

                  Also you’ve done much more than that. You’ve slung out accusations of being Kremlin propagandists, among a lot of other stuff.

                • HornyOnMain [she/her]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  22
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Why is that so hard for you to wrap your head around?

                  Because you were defending the US revolution to own more slaves and commit more genocide elsewhere in the thread, which isn’t a particularly socialist position.

                • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  21
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  LIB i don’t have time to engage in any actual points with people on Lemmy.

                  I only have time to bait an entire community so i can dissmiss them as weirdos for commenting on my bait post

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Interesting, I’m not seeing the hexbears… has my instance blocked them or has hexbear blocked me?

      It’s kinda a nothing of value lost kinda situation, just curious about why I’m not seeing them any more.

    • rjs001@lemmygrad.ml
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Awww, another alt-right nut is upset their Nazi country is not just Nazis, but Nazi loosers

    • Gsus4@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Thank you for your sacrifice, now we can just mass block them :)

    • straycat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      Nederlands
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Apparently the thread’s got 117 comments, but only yours is showing. Don’t they have anything better to do? Seriously…

  • Outdoor_Catgirl [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    36
    ·
    10 months ago

    No shit. Western training and equipment is not fit for purpose. Acting as a colonial cop by bombing with impunity ≠ attacking the strongest defensive lines of the 21st century. All their wunderwaffe just gets blown up by mines or drones.

  • puff [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    36
    ·
    10 months ago

    Pretty telling that the new line being fed to NATO worshippers is ‘don’t say anything critical about our objective failures’. This is, ironically, the same message Goebbels pushed when failures began to mount on the eastern front after Stalingrad and then Kursk. As the Soviet steamroller continued to Berlin, the line in the media was ‘it is unpatriotic to say we are losing’. And then they lost.

  • Rapidcreek@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Somewhere in the Pentagon there surely must be a series of rooms isolated for this war. In them intelligence is gathered, counterparts in Ukraine can be in instant contact, resources from both armies are tracked, tactics are formulated, simulations are run. How do I know this? Because this would be too good of a learning opportunity to pass up.

    And those folks ain’t talking.

  • lntl@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    10 months ago

    Haters gonna hate. Still though, they’ll need to be cordial if some of these critics are also paying Ukrainian bills. Being rude is the fast track to falling out of favor with foriegn taxpayers.

  • macniel@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    10 months ago

    Good for Kyiv. Those armchair generals should shut up and fight if they think things are going slowly.