• dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    What else are they going to do? Just run anyway with no support and torpedo the chances anyone beats the Cheeto king?

    Have you considered… Pragmatism?

    • bad_news@lemmy.billiam.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Is it pragmatic to browbeat individual voters when the party itself is dysfunctional and insists on running candidates 75% of voters don’t want to see run?

      • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Yes it 100% fucking is.

        Given the choice between ruin the country and the planet in that order and “this candidate is uninspired” or “wow not very good”, you have to be a giant entitled sack of shit to make everyone go down the road of ruined country and planet. We would ALL like it to be a better choice, but for christs sake don’t be an obstinate fuckstick: it’s not getting you a better candidate, it’s literally just punishing everyone if you stay home.

        Choose between: “you might get to choose a good option again”, and “you almost definitely won’t”. That’s what’s on the table. You HAVE a preference, but it’s not an inspired choice. When it’s orange Hitler vs green Hitler, by all means, make your stand. If you are making a stand between orange Hitler and “meh” you deserve a brow beating every hour of every day until November.