• thehatfox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    how can we realistically protect something we broadcast.

    With appropriate privacy laws and security measures. A smartphone is publicly broadcasting information, in that any other person could receive the radio transmissions emitted from them. But such eavesdropping would be illegal in most cases, and is mostly encrypted to hinder bad actors who don’t obey such laws.

    It’s important we act now to ensure there are suitable privacy provisions in place now for all biometrics, before such things as mass DNA collection and sequencing are practical. Once such technology is available, perhaps we will also have to adapt our behaviour in public to prevent leakage of unprotected biometric assets.

    Time to start advocating for biometric privacy, and investing in bodysuits and hair nets.

    • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      you are completely ignoring the fact that a global genetic database is not only in progress, it is inevitable.

      you cannot protect something you not only broadcast to the entire world with every breathe, but are also incapable of stopping or encrypting that data, or breaking its chain back to the other humans to which you got yours from.

      we absolutely should protect humans from corporations looking to abuse this data, but you need to understand. its public data, and there is zero you can do about its existence or aggregation.