All smartphones, including iPhones, must have replaceable batteries by 2027 in the EU::undefined

  • mlfh@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Thank fucking god for the EU, for fighting for global digital rights where nobody else does.

  • cordlesslamp@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Apple in 2027: This is not a battery, it’s a…umm … Ultra High Density Low Current Super Capacitor.

  • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    My current device and the two before that all have had removable batteries. I’ve always thought built in batteries are stupid and it’s nice to finally notice that other people agree. Hopefully they next mandate that it has to be able to be taken apart with a screwdriver and spare parts must be able to be purchased straight from the manufacturer.

    • June@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I prefer ip68 to easily accessible battery. I’ll need to change my battery maybe once every 3 years, but I need to know it can handle moisture far more often than that.

      • afunkysongaday@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Psst those Brands are not your friends and might lie about their reasons to make batteries non-removable.

  • giant_smeeg@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly good. Usb C is so good.

    I have a couple of 100w chargers around the house, no messing about can charge nearly everything at full speed.

  • Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s NOT just phones.

    It’s EVERYTHING with a battery. Including cars, laptops, e-bikes, video game controllers, headphones etc. (im not even sure if there are exceptions, such as tiny tiny “airpod” like things… ?)

    And they must be (with a few exceptions) replacable by a “layman”, without the use of special tools - which means no heat pads, to soften up glue etc etc. (and for gods sake, i hope it also means apple can’t hardwareID lock a battery)

    an exception mentioned in the EU document about the law says, high power batteries for example in an electric car, must be done by a profesional - but of course it still has to be “replacable” and not… tear the whole car apart and rebuild it using new batteries.

    replacable batteries in headphones, bluetooth mice, laptops etc, is gonna be awesome.

    and lets not forget, they have to recycle the old ones - and produce new batteries using recycled materials.

    in fact, i will try to hold on replacing my current (2 year old) phone, and wait to get one before 2027. Usually the battery turns to shit in 3ish years.

    • TheWiseAlaundo@lemmy.whynotdrs.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Gonna make a guess here and assume that the EU probably wants to increase lithium recycling. Removable batteries would probably make that goal a bit more achievable

  • UnderScore@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The fact that some of the gen Z crowd think it will be horrible have forgotten that it was much easier to carry 2 batteries and swap them out vs carrying a charger and cable with you everywhere. Pop in the new battery, power it on and carry on with you now full battery phone. Being tethered to a wall so you can have 10% from 20 minutes of charging is crazy.

    • chaircat@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I used to do this. I thought it was awesome but I was literally the only person I ever knew who did this. It was not a popular thing to do.

    • andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t forget the option to carry a 30lb battery bank everywhere with you so you’re at least tethered to something marginally more movable than a wall.

      Seriously though, I miss my phone+battery in one charger and the ability to restart with full battery at around 4pm.

  • ShittyRedditWasBetter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fuck the EU. I hope we still get good small phones and EU assholes only get big bloated as fuck ones.

    This is EU actively making my phone more shitty.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Coming soon from Apple. Screws that require a 4D tesseract shaped screwdriver to undo.

    But if you can undo them, feel free to change the battery.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The EU defines user replaceable as you can remove the batteries with common tools. Common tools is defined as a Phillips or flathead screwdriver. So even Nintendo and their stupid try-force screw thing won’t be acceptable.

  • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Stand back everyone, I’m going to attempt nuance.

    Industrial design is about tradeoffs. Making the battery easily replaceable will come with drawbacks. Maybe it’ll be size, or water resistance, or durability, but something will have to be compromised. The extent of the compromises remains to be seen, and people will have different opinions about whether it’s worth it.

    Ordinarily I’m not a fan of regulators making product design decisions, because that’s exactly the kind of thing market forces are supposed to be good at. In this case, though, there’s a demand that’s clearly not being met, and companies clearly have a vested interest in pushing consumers toward replacing their old hardware rather than repairing it, which creates externalities markets are unable to account for. Market failures like this are exactly the kind of situation where government regulation is needed.

    • Isycius@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Considering Samsung during their cost cutting days designed Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 without drawback just fine, I think everyone will be able to do it without drawback just fine as well.

    • jeanma@lemmy.ninja
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Industrial design is about tradeoffs

      Nope, for battery removal, nope!
      Are you going to say that pentalobe screws is also a trade-off.

      Also, smartphone are just too thin and it’s because you use a case that you tend to forget about it.

    • Bongles@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe it’ll be size, or water resistance, or durability, but something will have to be compromised.

      definitely size at the least. We’ll probably have to go back to removable backs so I imagine water proofing will be difficult without adding at least a little size.

      • paintbucketholder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        “But it would be bad for my favorite trillion dollar corporation and for their bottom line!!!”

        I’ll never understand consumers who insist to take the side of the corporation rather than the side of the customer on these issues.

        • focusedkiwibear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Because this isn’t good for the consumer only short sighted leftists who love others taking control for them are cool with the government telling companies how they can make their products

          • paintbucketholder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Instead of posting a rant about “short sighted leftists,” why don’t you explain precisely why it would be so horrible if users were able to install whatever operating system they wanted to install on the devices they’ve purchased with their own money?

    • __dev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You say that like Apple would have to put in a ton of work for that. Android can already run on iPhones. It’s just an ARM computer. Project Sandcastle already exists. All they have to do is allow unlocking the bootloader just like they do on macs.

    • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Well, an unlockable bootloader that allows flashing any operating system would be nice. You can install Linux on a Macbook, so why not an iPhone?

      Hardware should not ever be locked to an operating system.

    • My Password Is 1234@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      or installing any OS you want without voiding the warranty? I mean when you buy a computer, no one cares if you install Windows or Linux. So why do smartphone manufacturers care?

      • qyron@lemmy.pt
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Unless a lot as changed, they do care.

        Every single laptop and any prebuilt computer I find in the market comes pre installed with a Windows.

        A good friend approached me to install a Linux on a brand new machine and just to make sure we called the customer support line, informing there was interest to return the windows license, as the software would not be used.

        The reply we got was that by removing the software the warranty of the equipment would be null and void. The option was to ship the computer to their maintenance provider and have it removed, with costs presented at end for labour.