• notanaltaccount@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    4 months ago

    Plus it helps us realize that since they have more masculine haircuts they are even smarter, right?

    Because it wouldn’t make sense for the initial female to look the same and still be a physicist, right?

    Just pointing out that bias may also be affecting the cartoon too, even if not maliciously intended

    • Mojave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m pretty sure it’s the same hair, just getting more and more disheveled (frizzy and standing on-end) using a simpler art style. Not different hair styles entirely

      • notanaltaccount@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        No, it’s shorter and more masculine… since more masculine people do hard science like physics while even a regular mom who is a little bit smart could learn biology. (I don’t think this.) I am just pointing it out, it probably wasn’t done with intentiinal sexism.

    • luciferofastora@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’m fairly sure SMBC isn’t being misogynistic. They have no issue at all frequently featuring same-sex couples, fem-coded scientists and so on, as a perfectly normal part of the world. This is either you reading something into it, or a sheer coincidence.