• Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    You’re telling me that Pythagoras Theorem are invented by none other than John Theorem? You want me to believe that?

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      al- is Arabic for “the”, and English usually takes these loanwords with the article included.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I read a book in 6th grade math class called “A Gebra Named Al” that explained most of this.

      There were chemys named Al in that forest, iirc. I imagine they know a cohol or two named Al, too.

  • Geobloke@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s even better when you break the name down kwarizam is where he’s from and Muhammad is a common first name. It’s like saying Johnny English (or may be Jean Francois) invented calculus in 10-diggity-dig

  • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    literally completely accurate

    I’m consistently saddened by the changing state of the English language 😔

  • Please_Do_Not@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I always thought that the guy who invented the Internet created the first one. That’s why they’re called Al Gore-isms, no?

    • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      The Persians, Muslims, Arabs kept knowledge and science that would have been lost during the dark ages.

      If it wasn’t for their continued work in maths and sciences centuries would.have been lost / wasted.

      • SanndyTheManndy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Lost because they murdered and destroyed the very civilization that created said knowledge. So very nice of them.

        • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          because they murdered and destroyed the very civilization that created said knowledge

          What are you talking about?

          Are you blaming the collapse of the Roman Empire and the ensuing Dark Ages on Muslims? (A religion that didn’t even exist yet at the start of the Dark Ages.)

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Downvotes show that people here don’t know that even in 9th century a large part of the ME’s population was Christian dhimmis. Coptic, Assyrian, Armenian, Nestorian. “Dhimmi” means they couldn’t bear arms and had to pay “protection tax”, and also a “Muslim robbing a dhimmi” situation was usually resolved in favor of the Muslim.

          • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Which is vastly different from being murdered and having their civilizations destroyed, like for instance the Crusaders did.

            The Crusaders also did not stop from slaughtering orthodox Christians either.

            When looking at the details, Persian, Arab and Mauretanian rules over people of other religions were much more tolerant and civilized than comparable European ruling situations. I guess the saddest example of these are the Spanish Jews, who flourished under the “Moors” and got genocided and ethnically cleansed by the Catholics, after they were no longer dhimmis under Muslim rule.

            • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Are you high or something?

              Which is vastly different from being murdered and having their civilizations destroyed, like for instance the Crusaders did.

              The Crusaders didn’t do a fraction of what Muslims did during their actual initial conquest.

              When looking at the details, Persian, Arab and Mauretanian rules over people of other religions were much more tolerant and civilized than comparable European ruling situations. I guess the saddest example of these are the Spanish Jews, who flourished under the “Moors” and got genocided and ethnically cleansed by the Catholics, after they were no longer dhimmis under Muslim rule.

              I think you should go and learn the meaning of the word “firman” in the Middle-East.

              Anyway - I may agree about late Muslim rule in Spain specifically and some periods of Arab rule in Armenia, Mesopotamia and Egypt.

              In Iran Zoroastrians were to be exterminated, they wouldn’t get that sweet dhimmi status. Which may be one of the reasons it became largely Christian after the conquest and then largely Shia.

              • HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                The Crusaders didn’t do a fraction of what Muslims did during their actual initial conquest.

                The Crusaders killed every man, woman, and child in Jerusalem until the streets were flowing with blood.

                • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Go read something on

                  what Muslims did during their actual initial conquest

                  . This was casual for them. The difference is, though, that Crusaders didn’t intentionally destroy books and art.

    • Contravariant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I mean Fibonacci did more or less the same thing to his work a few centuries later, so fair play I guess.

    • Longpork3@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Built off it, rather than copied it. That’s par for the course in most science.

        • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          True but then again that’s the point: he stole some fame as a scientist. Or at least as an “inventor”.

          Great businessmen always steal, they don’t have the ethics to do actual work