Why are knife control laws so strong in the United States as opposed to gun control?

I was realizing it would be nice to have a knife with auto opening for boxes, etc., basically a switch blade or similar, and I found out that they are super illegal in my state (and/or there are length restrictions, or both sides of the blade can’t be sharp, etc), but I can go into a sporting goods store and buy a pistol and ammo in under 30min.

Shooting open an Amazon box seems inefficient. What is up with restrictive knife-control laws??

  • ChadCMulligan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    The workaround is to buy a small handgun for concealed carry and then attach a small switchblade bayonet.

    Your right to open boxes shall not be infringed

  • Tiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Butterfly knives only became legal in NY and MA about 4 years ago. There’s virtually zero reason to ban them other than protecting stupid people from accidentally cutting themselves

    (I’m one of those stupid people)

    • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I had one of those in high school and took it with me to a school trip in my back pack. We were at camp (think log houses) for three nights and I started spinning the blade daily. Lots of cuts (mostly on my hands) later I’ve learned to flip it like a pro. I can still do it to this day if someone hands me one. It’s like biking or swimming. Once you learn it, you don’t forget.

      The teacher that was with us never said anything besides watching my progress. He was the coolest dude ever. I miss you, Mr Jones.

  • Geek_King@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    When a moral panic happens, a lot of things get blown out of proportion. A good example was the panic relating to D&D and satanism. There was a huge panic sometime in the 50s or 60s about the police dealing with young thugs with concealed switch blades, which could be hidden, and then deployed one handed so fast a cop couldn’t draw his weapon fast enough. So this panic got a lot of laws drawn up to ban any switch blade.

    Since then, the there are knives that skirt the law by not having a spring which force the blade open, instead a tension bar. There are still types are illegal to carry if a Cop would find out you have it, like “Out the front” switch knives.

    The stupid part is, there are plenty of “one hand deployable” knives on the market that are 100% legal. But the laws never get revisited. In my state it’s illegal to have a out the front switch blade, yet a bunch of high end OTF knives are for sale at a sporting store. They just post a sign that says “Know your local laws”, which some how makes it okay to sell.

    If anyone has more to add, or corrects, let me know.

    • SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It also goes to show how laws made during the moral panic don’t go away even decades after that panic fades.

      This is often in mind when responsible gun owners are critical of more gun laws. The govt won’t go “that was silly of us here’s your bit of freedom back” even if a law objectively had zero positive effect

      • Kaboom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        For example, short barrelled rifles are still heavily regulated. Pistols aren’t nearly as regulated.

  • Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Because so-called second amendment advocates are really just gun nuts, and so over the years they have worked hard to maintain the right to keep and bear guns, rather than arms.

    Thus knives, swords, halberds, maces, and all other ‘arms’ have had restrictions go unchallenged, or at least, not challenged by an extensive and well funded network of advocacy.

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    If you look at the timing of most the laws against specific types of knives… you’re going to notice a pattern where there was some scare involving some minority or alt group.

    Switch blades were outlaws after Hollywood depicted African American villains as gangsters with them.

    Same with ballisongs and Asian gangsters/villians.

    All of that said, auto-openers have a hair trigger and I would suggest instead getting a good flipper you can easily flick open. Benchmade bugout is my EDC (not for fighting, it’s light and solid.)

  • FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    They aren’t: This is 100% state dependent. Some states have extremely permissive laws allowing you to carry anything from a switchblade to a greatsword if you want.

    • WoahWoah@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Yes, and gun laws are state dependent as well. I’m not talking about federal law (though technically the Federal Switchblade Act of 1958 is still in force), I’m saying that arguably the majority of states in the United States have more permissive gun laws than knife laws, and it’s absurd.

      • theyoyomaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Most of the truly ridiculous knife laws are in states with equally ridiculous gun laws. A few have been challenged under 2A grounds with some degree of success but it just isn’t being pursued that much.

  • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Well there are such restrictions on guns, try and get a short barrel rifle in under 30 min, the paperwork alone will take that long.

    But also yeah those laws suck and shouldn’t exist. Much like the original intent behind CCW permits where the theory was “concealing is for criminals,” those knives were also seen as “for criminals.” It’s just old outdated bullshit that goes largely uncharged but can be used if they want to fuck with you. In some cases “criminals” was also synonymous with black people or even italians depending on the year lol, and were passed for racist reasons.

    • pushECX@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I was thinking the same thing. There are definitely restrictions on the size/function of guns, and you have to fill out paperwork, get fingerprinted, etc to get past those restrictions.

      To buy any gun at a store, you also have to have a background check, which you generally don’t have to do for knives.

      • WoahWoah@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        While that is true, in states with restrictive knife laws, there is no permitting, tax stamp, or background check option. They’re simply illegal typically without exception.

        I.e., a CCW does not apply to an OTF knife or dagger in states where those types of knives are illegal, and there is no legal option available to legally carry one. Conversely, with sufficient paperwork, background check, and tax stamps, etc, you can get a machine gun.

        I am just pointing out how odd it is that in some states there is a legal avenue for a citizen to purchase, own, and use a machine gun but not a small blade that opens with a button. But laws are often crazy, so, I guess it’s not really a huge surprise.

  • clif@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Depends on the state. Down here there are pretty much zero restrictions except with an asterisk that it’s illegal to harm someone with them… AKA, an extra charge of you’re a dick and stab someone.

    I’ve been carrying an “out the front automatic” for the last few years.