Hello World, As many of you have probably noticed, there is a growing problem on the internet when it comes to undisclosed bias in both amateur and professional reporting. While not every outlet can be like the C-SPAN, or Reuters, we also believe that it’s impossible to remove the human element from the news, especially when it concerns, well, humans.

To this end, we’ve created a media bias bot, which we hope will keep everyone informed about WHO, not just the WHAT of posted articles. This bot uses Media Bias/Fact Check to add a simple reply to show bias. We feel this is especially important with the US Election coming up. The bot will also provide links to Ground.News, as well, which we feel is a great source to determine the WHOLE coverage of a given article and/or topic.

As always feedback is welcome, as this is a active project which we really hope will benefit the community.

Thanks!

FHF / LemmyWorld Admin team 💖

  • Rooki@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    Ok then tell me an alternative we can use in the scale for free.

    None? Then pls dont just complain complain complain… And dont suggest improvements.

    • Maalus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      Boooo. Running a community as a mod-dictator and not being able to hear feedback and react to it like an adult. Just because you thought of something, doesn’t mean it is a good idea or that people will like it. The approach of “better than nothing” is naive and plain wrong - misinformation isn’t “better than nothing” it actively hurts the community.

    • Deceptichum@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      You don’t.

      There doesn’t exist a site to magically do what you want.

      Likewise it’s not needed. It doesn’t add to the quality of discussion on the community. All it’s going to do is cause conflict as we now have to constantly point out to people how garbage the source is so that they don’t let it influence them.

      • Rooki@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        No we dont. We saw the expected “ReMoVe ThE BoT” comments, because MBFC did hurt their feelings by not rating their favourite newspage the highest creditability on earth.

        And just block it, then you can imagine how it is without the bot.

        • AhismaMiasma@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I don’t care what it rates a particular news page, I care that you’re treating this as an objective/unbiased authority on truth that you feel needs to be communicated on every single post.

          You could take a moment to reflect on all of the responses you’ve received, but your comments make it clear that you don’t value other perspectives.

    • TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      As the other poster says we don’t need to have something like this at all.

      If you’re adamant about it then make a post where people can suggest which one we use and vote on it. We can also adjust the bots comment to clearly call out the chosen ones biases and methodology. As it is now it’s actively harmful as I mention in my other comment.

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Every newspaper has its bias. MBFC heavily favors western liberal perspectives. It is often fine on domestic policy but not reliable when it comes to foreign policy.

      As this is worldnews and not Americanews, MBFC ratings are not reliable. Articles should be judged by the evidence they provide.

    • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I find the only people that say MBFC is biased, are just saying they themselves have biased opinions so they don’t agree with the MBFC rating

      I’m 1000% with you on this