• mommykink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    During the Great Depression the federal government literally paid farmers to not harvest crops because allowing that much food to be produced would dilute the market and bring down crop prices.

    During the Great Depression.

    A time when people were starving and there were virtually no forms of welfare.

    When millions were thrust into poverty for reasons entirely out of their control.

    The federal government paid farmers to create less food to protect profit margins.

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Farmers have bills to pay, too. If the price of growing food doesn’t cover the cost to make it they’ll go out of business. Then there will be one less farm to grow food. If there’s no farms and we’re totally reliant on imports, that’s a strategic weakness.

      It’s the same reason we prop up carmakers when they go out of business: Manufacturing capacity is a strategic asset just like farmland.

      • Slowy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Then subsidize the farmers by the amount you were paying them to not harvest the food ? They don’t make any money when they aren’t selling it at all either, without this intervention…