• QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I’m a 3 trade branch manager and the overwhelming commonality that drives motivation is telling the apprentices how much they can make a year consistently.

    I had a guy who wouldn’t touch drains (plumbers mostly are above that for some reason) until he found out that he could make $150K/year as a drain tech (no license needed generally). Proved it with one of his peers and he literally switched his tune immediately.

    Average HVAC service techs should be at $100K. Good electricians are at $200K+.

    Yeah, they make a lot more than most people. That’s what they should be telling young people. Like working with your hands or you’re a visual learner? Trades is where you should be. You’ll be happy, well paid, and have an amazing sense of accomplishment every day. It’s a great living.

      • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Basically, drain techs unclog drains with drain snakes or augers. They can also scope the drain with a 100’ inspection camera to see what is causing a clog. Could be roots ingressing a drain or a clay pipe that’s cracking. That’s where the big money is because replacing the pipe is the only long lasting solution. Some companies do pipe lining but that’s a bandaid for more year instead of decades. Replacing the pipe can involve excavating and concrete removal. Gets expensive fast. We’re doing a job that involves excavating 8’ down to the main drain, replacing 20’ of pipe and then covering it back up, demoing concrete to replace the basement line, and repairing concrete. $15k and the tech gets 8% of the sale and 10% if they do the work for a total of 18%. $2,700 gross isn’t bad for a hard day or 2 days work.

    • ZapBeebz_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      On August 26, 1935, the United Auto Workers established an elite union for all auto mechanics. Its purpose was to teach the lost art of collective bargaining and to ensure that all the union members were the best compensated mechanics in the world.

      They succeeded

      Today, the UAW calls it a union. The mechanics call it:

      TOP WRENCH

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Unions. If my kid who is choosing between college and electrician had a strong electrical workers union to go to to start, it would make a huge difference to that decision.

  • theluddite@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Not directly to your question, but I dislike this NPR article very much.

    Mwandjalulu dreamed of becoming a carpenter or electrician as a child. And now he’s fulfilling that dream. But that also makes him an exception to the rule. While Gen Z — often described as people born between 1997 and 2012 — is on track to become the most educated generation, fewer young folks are opting for traditionally hands-on jobs in the skilled trade and technical industries.

    The entire article contains a buried classist assumption. Carpenters have just as much a reason to study theater, literature, or philosophy as, say, project managers at tech companies (those three examples are from PMs that I’ve worked with). Being educated and a carpenter are only in tension because of decisions that we’ve made, because having read Plato has as much in common with being a carpenter as it does with being a PM. Conversely, it would be fucking lit if our society had the most educated plumbers and carpenters in the world.

    NPR here is treating school as job training, which is, in my opinion, the root problem. Job training is definitely a part of school, but school and society writ large have a much deeper relationship: An educated public is necessary for a functioning democracy. 1 in 5 Americans is illiterate. If we want a functioning democracy, then we need to invest in everyone’s education for its own sake, rather than treat it as a distinguishing feature between lower classes and upper ones, and we need to treat blue collar workers as people who also might wish to be intellectually fulfilled, rather than as a monolithic class of people who have some innate desire to work with their hands and avoid book learning (though those kinds of people need also be welcomed).

    Occupations such as auto technician with aging workforces have the U.S. Chamber of Commerce warning of a “massive” shortage of skilled workers in 2023.

    This is your regular reminder that the Chamber of Commerce is a private entity that represents capital. Everything that they say should be taken with a grain of salt. There’s a massive shortage of skilled workers for the rates that businesses are willing to pay, which has been stagnant for decades as corporate profits have gone up. If you open literally any business and offer candidates enough money, you’ll have a line out the door to apply.

    • microphone900@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      The second half is me. I absolutely loved being a carpenter for the 3 years that I did it. But I left the field because I knew the pay ceiling wouldn’t be like in the days when my dad was my age. So, I moved to an office job that pays more than the guys in charge of work sites were (and are currently) making and I get actual benefits. I’d go back to it in a heartbeat if the pay and benefits were better, and I don’t mean matching my current ones, just definitely middle class.

      I do wonder what will happen when the number of people in the trades reduces because young adults aren’t going into them such that people can see it and feel it. Will the corps raise wages and improve benefits? Will the federal government make immigration easier or restart the WPA like during the Great Depression? I don’t know. What I do know is that my buddy who’s 35 is always one of the youngest electricians on job sites and that can’t be good for the trades.

    • ohlaph@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I agree we should do those things, but I don’t think that would increase trade job attractiveness.

  • bradorsomething@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    The market is taking care of itself - the article appears to be concerned that the relatively cheap jobs are not being filled at the previous going rate. I work in the trades, and average wage has gone up 40% in 10 years, and everyone is still hurting for new electricians, so this wage growth will increase for the foreseeable future. Classrooms are full of students seeing those wages… the market is taking care of itself.

    A large disincentive for the trades is the heat of the south, and the lower barrier to entry of those states is evident in the construction standards and output. Still wages will have to increase there, or work won’t get done.

    A lot of these articles pine for people willing to work at the previous low wage for a position, and much good may that do them.

    • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Skilled trades are generally union, the training is free through a union. If you go to a trade school or college, there are scholarships and sponsorships.

      In my area electricians and plumbers apprentices make around $20/hr with raises every 6 months.

  • satanmat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Stop with the relentless “Everyone should go to college “ BS

    Yes, historically college graduates make more over their lifetime; but if everyone has a college degree, and or every job requires a degree, especially when it really doesn’t need to; you devalue a degree.

    I’d push for a CCC for the trades. You’re likely to have to leave home, but we’ll hire you for …2-3 years and train you. No debt, you’ll get paid the whole time, and when you’re done you’ll be good to go

    • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      We’ve spent the last few hundred years deciding which people are better than others, and then go surprised Pikachu when nobody wants to do the jobs that we’ve dubbed “inferior”.

  • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Civil Construction programs.

    Basically military-like program for infrastructure. Sign up for 4 years, we’ll train you in an in demand trade, put you through the apprenticeship and pay you the whole time. Then send you to build infrastructure and work in construction around the country. Any out of region jobs would include housing.

    Cities, counties, states, and federal government would be required that x% of all government construction projects are to be done by this civilian construction program.

  • towerful@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Encourage/incentivise an actual apprentice scheme.
    I don’t know how to validate new apprenticeships, tho.
    I know there is some sort of apprenticeship program in the US. Bring that to the forefront. Subsidise it, advertised it, promote it.

    Apprentices shouldn’t be taxed, subsidise their health/personal/business insurances.
    Apprenticeships should include some basic training in business, taxes and finances.

    Have tax breaks for companies, and heavily fund self employed/sole-traders who take on an apprentice.

    You have to make apprenticeship as attractive as university & industry/corporate, especially in a world where technology is so exciting.
    Making apprenticeship pay decently, and not be a significant financial risk to employers (apprenters?) will make it a no-brainer to companies.
    Tax breaks or geants for big companies.
    And making apprenticeship extremely cheap and low risk for sole traders/self employed (IE, more of this than subsidies for companies) will stop it from being a big-company-only thing. Like subsidised special apprentice insurance, tax breaks, grants.

    Promote some sort of “ethical traders” kinda website, where traders with apprentices are advertised/promoted. Have some regulation around it, some customer reviews, make it neutral.
    The idea being consumers will go to the “ethical traders” website to find someone to do work because it is a regulated neutral 3rd party that only includes ethical traders with reputable customer reviews. Somewhere that companies will work to maintain reputation.

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    If I were President, my primary focus would be on restricting the ways we make people do anything economically.

    I’m in favor of free markets, aka people doing that they choose, not what I make them do.