• pH3ra@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s just my opinion (since it’s not in the article) but a thing that makes Gnome and Libadwaita a “modern design” is the fact that the production behind it tries to bridge the gap between a “mouse and keyboard” and a “touch screen” workflow.
    None of the other DEs come even close to Gnome when used on a tablet

    • thepoaster@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agreed, I’m not an expert, kind of new to linux, but I could see being very comfortable on a Gnome based tablet.

    • zeus ⁧ ⁧ ∽↯∼@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      meh, subjectively i find that creates a “worst of both worlds” situation. but this comment was more about the futility of the development time that went into this specific feature

      • pH3ra@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        this comment was more about the futility of the development time that went into this specific feature

        yeah sorry, I should have been more specific with my answer: features like this are supposed to help you in a touch screen situation or in general with smaller screens.
        When the window is resized under a certain size, the left panel becomes hidden and with it part of the top bar, to make it less cluttered and confusing.

        • zeus ⁧ ⁧ ∽↯∼@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          but …surely you could just do the same thing with the old design? artist’s rendition:

          in fact, now i look at it, it makes them look even more similar once i collapse the sidebar