• No1@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I thought opting to bowl first was a mistake. The ball seemed livelier to start the evening session.

    I also thought Labuschagne was losing us the match with his stodgy play.

    I know nothing, Jon Snow Pat Cummins…

    And, even before the batting, that was a fantastic catch made to look much easier than it was…

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    “It was a big risk and it paid off.”

    "I’m definitely third on that list.

    It is a nice one to join," Head quipped of Australians who have made a ton in a World Cup final.

    “Travis put on a hell of a display and it was great to be a part of it with him,” he said.

    “Honestly, we were not good enough today,” he said.


    The original article contains 67 words, the summary contains 67 words. Saved 0%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • Nath@aussie.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 months ago

      Honestly bot, this might be the worst summary you have ever put out there.

      • SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        I have no idea why this bot isn’t banned. It’s fricking terrible. Almost every “summmary” would have been better off if they just pasted in the first two paragraphs.

        • Nath@aussie.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          It isn’t usually this bad. But yeah, some of them are terrible. As for banning, nobody has ever complained about it seriously. It is trivial to block it it bothers you, and you’ll never see the summaries again.