• CeeBee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    a lot of our decisions are guided by NERC CIP standards and where certain things fall within that framework.

    I would hazard a guess that this is more of a “safe-bet” thing rather than a hard policy. I tried looking up anything that stipulates using Windows over any other OSes, and this Software Integrity and Authenticity is the only thing I could find with a five minute search.

    Microsoft Windows provides such a mechanism for Microsoft signed software through its default configuration and through a Group Policy Object (GPO) that expands this capability to other trusted third parties.

    It doesn’t make sense that you wouldn’t be able to use Linux, unless the higher-ups making the decisions are your classic dinosaurs that still believe Microsoft’s propaganda from the 2000’s about the scary “communist” Linux OS and the dangerous open-source programs that will steal your company secrets.

    • banneryear1868@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Nah it’s because some core apps are not supported by the vendors on non-Windows OSs and adding an extra layer just to run Windows apps virtually/remotely when we could run them on workstations is unnecessary.