• Omniraptor@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      depressingly common, was even more common before we let women have rights

      • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        ‘we let’ women have rights? Women fought tooth and nail for years to get those rights, and assholes are still trying to claw them away; fuck, there’s places in the US right now where women are dying because their access to healthcare has been sabotaged by a supreme court that reinterpreted the constitution to remove their rights.

        • Omniraptor@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          “we” in this case could be the American government in general and the supreme court specifically. The fact that such an important right was “granted” by a decision of nine random schmucks and can be taken away by another decision (rather than being a law) is not a great look for that government.

          But you’re right that it was not the best phrasing. Activism is extremely important esp on more local levels