There used to be a Kbin instance called feddit.online, which was shut down. @[email protected] just announced on Mastodon, that he brought feddit.online back to life, this time using PieFed. PieFed is a pretty neat alternative to Lemmy and Kbin/Mbin, created by @[email protected] and of course it’s fully free and open source on Codeberg: https://codeberg.org/rimu/pyfedi
It has some cool features like “Topics”, which are basically groups of multiple communities that you can view all at once (similar to these Lemmy feature requests: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/3071 https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy-ui/issues/1113).

  • rglullis@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    24 hours ago

    If this is so important to you, you are still very much free to start your own instance and see how far it goes.

    • cacheson@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I’ve considered it, but my skillset isn’t really suited to it as a solo project. I can write code, and I have a reasonable understanding of the human factors side of things, but my IT skills are lacking. I’d be happy to join a team of like-minded people undertaking such a project, though.

      • rglullis@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        The problem is not code. The problem is that no one wants to take this responsibility. Every one wants to talk about supportive they are on sex positivity until some men in uniform knocks on their doors because they are running a website that is available for minors all around the world.

        Also, I don’t even want to get in the discussion of “sex positivity” being associated with “easily available porn”. Like you said, porn is easy to find and I really doubt that the someone who is savvy enough to use Lemmy would have trouble to know where it is.

        • cacheson@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Every one wants to talk about supportive they are on sex positivity until some men in uniform knocks on their doors because they are running a website that is available for minors all around the world.

          Are you speaking from first-hand experience, or is this conjecture? At least in the US, complying with the law isn’t that difficult.

          Also, I don’t even want to get in the discussion of “sex positivity” being associated with “easily available porn”.

          That’s an odd way to avoid discussing it. Do you think the availability of porn (or prohibition thereof) within an online space has no effect on what kind of culture develops there?

          • rglullis@communick.news
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            18 hours ago

            Do you think the availability of porn within an online space has no effect on what kind of culture develops there?

            Of course it does have an effect, but there is a difference between “can be found” and “should be encouraged to be treated on equal footing as any other community forum”.

            Much like “absolute freedom of speech” platforms that inevitably end up catering to people who want to say only repulsive things without repercussion, what do you think will happen if you create an online space and put a big billboard saying “here you will always be free to share your NSFW content”?

            Content discovery of porn should not be as easy and it should not be trivialized under the pretense of “sex positivity”. One can have an absolutely open mind about sex and sexuality while still wanting to keep a clear boundary of when/how/whom to talk about it.

            • cacheson@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              You seem to be implying that I’m arguing something that I’m not? This thread started with me lamenting that piefed.social accounts are prohibited from accessing NSFW communities, and inquiring whether feddit.online would have the same policies. Along with some commentary on the general state of the threadiverse’s culture.

              Note that I haven’t asked either admin to host said communities, and I specifically acknowledged the caching issue. Nor am I advocating for them to be treated on absolutely equal footing; they’re specially marked so that people who don’t want to see them can filter them out, which I think is a good thing.

              what do you think will happen if you create an online space and put a big billboard saying “here you will always be free to share your NSFW content”?

              If you’re specifically advertising it as focused on that, then that’s likely what you’ll get. If you allow NSFW but don’t center it, you’ll end up with something like Reddit, Twitter, or pre-ban Tumblr. While there are things to criticize about those sites, very little of it has to do with porn.

              Content discovery of porn should not be as easy and it should not be trivialized under the pretense of “sex positivity”.

              Why? That absolutely sounds like a sex-negative attitude to me. It’s treating sexuality as something toxic that needs to be suppressed and hidden even from those that are interested in seeing it. Sex positivity means treating sexuality as a normal thing that is not unusual for people to be interested in.

              • rglullis@communick.news
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                advocating for them to be treated on absolutely equal footing; they’re specially marked so that people who don’t

                You lamented the fact that unlogged users can not see it and that they can not be found as easily. This is the same as “make it available to the public without any type of check”.

                It’s treating sexuality as something toxic

                Sexuality != Porn, and “toxicity” is dose-dependent. Eating a bit of broccoli is good for you. Too much at once and you get thyroid dysfunction.

                There are plenty of things that are good and normal, but need to be discussed/presented with a proper context and (most importantly) people need to have a better understanding of the potential bad consequences if it is abused or corrupted.

                You don’t see young people destroying their lives because they were promised they could make a lot of money by knitting sweaters or working as electricians, but cases of vulnerable women who regret getting into sex work are infinite.