Ed Greenwood’s YT channel did more for me to appreciate Forgotten Realms as a setting than any book WotC put out, and he constantly revisits areas WotC has no interest in, like Sembia or Cormyr or Daelands.

  • shani66@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Wizards really doesn’t care about anything they’ve actually done well. Their mostly abandoned settings are by far their best, the forgotten realms (and the sword coast specifically) are barely even mid.

    • Xatolos@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      WotC never cared much about the novel and stories part of their IPs. You could tell from the MtG lore that it always was a distant second.

      Forgotten Realms was amazing in the 80s and 90s, but that was when it wasn’t bought out by WotC and still a part of TSR. Now that it’s part of WitC (Hasbro), all of the lore is not cared much about in all their IPs.

    • macniel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Who needs a setting when you can simply pump out and sell campaign books. It would only empower the obsolete human DM.

    • I also didn’t know he had a youtube channel and I don’t think I’ve looked at a picture of him since the 90s. I had NO idea the dude had literally turned into Elminster.

  • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    What’s the appeal of the default dnd lore? It’s always seemed very generic to me and I’ve always rolled my own instead, or made so many changes it might as well be homebrew.

    • TheGreatDarkness@ttrpg.networkOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      You should consider that Forgotten Realms wasn’t really the default setting before 5e.

      In 4e it was Points of Laght/Dawn World/Netir Vale which was designed from bottom up to be easy to put in anything you want and it is credited for codifying on paper worldbuilding principles that are as wold as fantasy itsel (the poitns of light-style world). In 3e era it was Generic Setting, which was just Greyhawk without any words that would make them have to pay Gygax royalties. In TSR there was no default setting, they all just coexisted.

      WotC turned Realms into a default setting by pretending any unique stuff doesn’t exist or trying to make it “the default” - look at Gnolls. The “hyenas turned into half-demons from eating Yeenoghu’s blood” thing could work for Realms (it’s a new lore invented for this edition), but WotC just HAD to try to force it on ever other world they own, goig so far to retcon two Gnoll bodyguards in Sinsiter Secret of Saltmarsh into Hobgoblins, just to keep the illusion Realms have nothing unique going for it.

    • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      The genericness makes it easy to grasp, which can be good for people who don’t or haven’t engaged much with fantasy. It also means the setting doesn’t matter much to people’s stories, allowing them to put whatever they really want in it. It’s just a whatever world for them to plonk adventures down in.

      • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        That makes a lot of sense. I’ve just always been a little thrown off by people who seem like lore nerds for it. I don’t mean to insult anyone, just curious to hear about it from someone who’s into it.