witchdoctor@lemmy.basedcount.com to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 2 years agoSearch engines comparedlemmy.basedcount.comimagemessage-square113linkfedilinkarrow-up1280arrow-down1122
arrow-up1158arrow-down1imageSearch engines comparedlemmy.basedcount.comwitchdoctor@lemmy.basedcount.com to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 2 years agomessage-square113linkfedilink
minus-square𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·2 years agoDisturbing for having their slogan as, “the search engine that doesn’t know anything about you” I guess they meant, “doesn’t know anything about you… Yet”
minus-squareKilgore Trout@feddit.itlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 years agoThey need to earn money somehow, and the deal with Microsoft is the least privacy-invasive option they found. I suggest overall to use SearxNG, but Qwant isn’t bad.
minus-square𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 years agoNo doubt. And I’m not faulting them for making the deal or for collecting the data in general. I am, however, faulting them for claiming they don’t know anything about you and then turn around and collect things about you.
deleted by creator
I’m wondering that, too.
deleted by creator
Disturbing for having their slogan as, “the search engine that doesn’t know anything about you”
I guess they meant, “doesn’t know anything about you… Yet”
They need to earn money somehow, and the deal with Microsoft is the least privacy-invasive option they found.
I suggest overall to use SearxNG, but Qwant isn’t bad.
No doubt. And I’m not faulting them for making the deal or for collecting the data in general. I am, however, faulting them for claiming they don’t know anything about you and then turn around and collect things about you.
deleted by creator