• ransomwarelettuce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    There is no doubt that AMD is a better company than NVIDIA in OSS terms.

    But don’t simp for a company, vote with your wallet and always look for the best and consumer friendly product.

    For now, not gonna lie AMD is pretty rad, but I hope next generation Intel GPUs are competitive.

    • Prethoryn Overmind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think AMD is a great competitor and we need more competition to lay it to NVIDIA and AMD as well, BUT HOLY FUCK. I can’t stand AMD’s software/control panel vs NVIDIA’s.

      • liamwb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I just switched from nvidia to and and I have the exact opposite feeling lol

        • taco_ballerina@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          Aye. The Nvidia control center was cool when I installed it for my Ti 4600 in 2002 and not much has changed. I’m not particularly fond but the aesthetics of the Radeon software, but it beats the heck out of the semi-useless GeForce experience. I have to make an account just to see if there’s a driver update available? I can’t even control fan speeds in Windows without third party software?

          They’re both bad but in comparison Nvidia’s offering is garbage.

          • iegod@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You don’t need an account for drivers. You can still get those for free off their website just like you could in 1999. You only need an account for their experience app.

        • Prethoryn Overmind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Care to explain your gripes?

          At least with NVIDIA’s control panel I can find what I am looking for but my god AMD’s software feels so damn unorganized.

          • liamwb@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well I guess there’s two parts of the nvidia software experience, geforce and the control panel. The control panel is functionally fine, but the ui is very dated and the available features are a bit limited. Geforce is pretty widely reviled as far as I can tell so I won’t go into it.

            I just find the amd ui nice, and I like how you get quite simple and direct control over your video card, eg you can do some simple oc/undervolting, choose which software special sauce you want at a glance, and so on.

            • propaganja@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              My first-ever Nvidia card was a 3080Ti. After installation I was genuinely confused and kept clicking around everywhere looking for the real settings panel.

              Actually I remember, my older laptop had a MX150 (lol) so I did know all about GeForce Control Panel and Experience—I just thought they were the outdated bargain-basement solution assigned to POS hardware like mine, not worth (understandably) slapping shiny new chrome on.

              Subsequently I had automatically assumed without a doubt in my mind that the pandemic card I had paid for in tainted blood would have some uber slick new interface that I couldn’t wait to play around with.

              Needless to say, my disappointment was immeasurable and my day was ruined.

    • iegod@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I thought the current gen Intel ones are actually pretty decent. Solid budget choice for modern games.

      • EvokerKing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If it can run them… I sold mine because they never actually fixed the drivers. Out of hundreds of games on my PC, it was able to run 3-4. This isn’t before their updates either. This happened 2 weeks ago. It can’t run davinci resolve despite having good encoders, it couldn’t even fucking run valorant Also they are only good in benchmarks, I found that my old 3050 was outperforming it in terms of fps.

  • Redderthanmisty@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    AMD’s your friend now, but they’re only undercutting NVIDIA like this to get on top of the market. Once they’ve done that, it will be NVIDIA doing the undercutting, and AMD will be the one clamping down and exploiting their position.

    It has happened time and time again.

    Don’t simp for corporations. They’ll never return the favour.

    • solarvector@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Generally agree, but when one of the two participants in a market is actively hostile to users and the other is actually competing for market share, seems like that’s worth acknowledging. Especially when we so many examples of either outright collusion or as soon as one corporation introduces a new hostile feature all the others in the market follow.

      On that note, I’m waiting for the day Nvidia announces a subscription service for unlocking cores or clock speeds.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      The triple whammy of semiconductor shortage, pandemic and cryptocunts has really fucked PC gaming for a generation. The price is way out of line with the capabilities compared to a PS5.

      I’m still on a 1060 for my PC, and it’s only my GSync monitor that saves it. Variable frame rates really is great for all PC games tbh. You don’t have to frig about with settings as much because Opening Bare Area runs at 60fps, but the later Hall of a Million Alpha Effects runs at 30. You just let it rip between 40 and 80, no tearing, and fairly even frame pacing. The old “is this game looking as good as it can on my hardware while still playing smoothly?” question goes away, because you just get extra frames instead, and just knock the whole thing down one notch when it gets too bad. I’m spending more time playing and less time tweaking and that can only be a good thing.

      • Raz@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m just clutching my pre-covid, pre-shortage GTX 1080ti. Hoping it’ll keep powering through a little longer. Honestly, it’s an amazing card. If it ever dies on me or becomes too obsolete, I’ll frame it and hang it on my wall.

        I just wish AMD cards were better at ray tracing and “work” than Nvidia cards. Otherwise I’d have already splurged on an AMD if I could.

  • LetMeEatCake@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    GPU prices being affordable is definitely not a priority of AMD’s. They price everything to be barely competitive with the Nvidia equivalent. 10-15% cheaper for comparable raster performance but far worse RT performance and no DLSS.

    Which is odd because back when AMD was in a similar performance deficit on the CPU front (Zen 1, Zen+, and Zen 2), AMD had absolutely no qualms or (public) reservations about pricing their CPUs where they needed to be. They were the value kings on that front, which is exactly what they needed to be at the time. They need that with GPUs and just refuse to go there. They follow Nvidia’s pricing lead.

      • justsomeguy345@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        something many people overlook is how intertwined nvidia, intel and amd are. not only does the personnel routinely switch between those companies but they also have the same top share holders. there’s no natural competition between them. it’s like a choreograhped light saber fight where all of them are swinging but none seem to have any intention to hit flesh. a show to make sure nobody says the m word.

      • LetMeEatCake@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree, it’s just strange from a business perspective too. Obviously the people in charge of AMD feel that this is the correct course of action, but they’ve been losing ground for years and years in the GPU space. At least as an outside observer this approach is not serving them well for GPU. Pricing more aggressively today will hurt their margins temporarily but with such a mindshare dominated market they need to start to grow their marketshare early. They need people to use their shit and realize it’s fine. They did it with CPUs…

    • eldenlord@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      not to mention except north america, in almost all countries amd gpu is always $100 more expensive than nvidia counterpart making it just non sense to buy any amd card unless you are just a fanboy

  • SaltyLemon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    AMD has been great and all buy their prices are NOT affordable. They’ve been jaking up their prices like everyone else in the last years. Don’t paint them as the heroes.

  • mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Where I can find the source?

    As far as I searched what is free software is the Vulkan implementation that runs on top of the intrinsic GPU and drivers (that have DRM and no source code).

    The intrinsic GPU drivers on the kernel are still close source. So basically AMD and NVIDIA are the same. They both have source for some engines implementation but both kernel drivers are close source.

    https://github.com/GPUOpen-Drivers/

    amdgpu is a blob.

    I’m missing something?

  • beq@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have read many of the comments in the thread, but there is a very basic question I hope someone can help me with: what does the OP even mean?

    I know what AMD is and what they do, but “taking W’s”? And “giving them away”?

    • jsdz@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      “W” is a letter often used to represent a “Win” which I assume is what’s meant here since that’s what AMD have been doing.

  • Crabhands@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I get it, however when I’m paying $1000+ for a GPU, I want the best for my money now. Not take part in some bigger than me ploy to even out companies.

    Government regulations > a few people buying a worse GPU

  • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    That is what you have to do if you’re behind the competition. Don’t think they’ll keep this up for long if they happen to be the industry leader.

  • glibg10b@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    AMD’s had some buggy drivers and misleading graphs, but they’re overall infinitely more consumer-friendly than Nvidia

  • verve@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’re open sourcing them so I can finally fix the audio bug my Lenovo Ideapad 14API gets on any drivers above 21.8.1. Maybe. Idk shit about software. But i know this is good

  • phej@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m still using my EVGA GeForce 1070. When it’s time to upgrade, I’m going with AMD.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Only reason I don’t is because:

      1. nvidia just works better on linux. Well… I heard that’s changed so this may no longer be relevant

      2. I don’t think AMD GPUs work well compared to nVidia with Davinci Resolve

      3. DLSS/Ray Tracing. Even though I never use ray tracing because even the first card with it couldn’t handle it 😅

      • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago
        1. nvidia just works better on linux. Well… I heard that’s changed so this may no longer be relevant

        This isn’t and has never been the case. Nvidia and AMD are comparable performance-wise on Linux these days, but since the Nvidia drivers are proprietary, they’re automatically harder to deal with than the open-source AMD drivers. For that reason alone, AMD is easier to use with Linux out of the box, because the Linux kernel has AMD drivers built in. You still have to install userspace drivers in either case, but the open-source AMD userspace drivers have outperformed Nvidia’s proprietary drivers for a long time. It’s only been within the last couple years that Nvidia’s proprietary drivers have reached parity with AMD’s open-source ones.

      • ReakDuck@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago
        1. I switched to AMD because nvidia worked like dogshit on Linux. Especially when I needed Wayland.

        2. I really dunno

        3. FSR is the replacement. But RTX would be slower on AMD but still good enough for some people.

        • bi_tux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve had a Nvidia card for a long time (just built my new pc 2 months ago) Wayland worked mostly ok for me the last year. But I’ve used x11 until 2023, so I can’t really sayhow it was.

      • milkjug@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        #1 - I don’t know, have you tried making VAAPI work on your browsers? Assuming you are using DEs and not running command line servers.