• 31337@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I assume the “kill it” comment was a little tongue-in-cheek. On small SBCs, like a Pi, or old hardware, it could be a problem. I’ve seen people with flatpaks taking up 30GB of space, which is significant. I’m not sure how much RAM it wastes. I assume running 6 different applications that have loaded 6 different versions of Qt libraries would also use significantly more RAM than just loading the system’s shared Qt libraries once.

    • pressanykeynow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t see a problem with Flatpak in this. It does what it’s supposed to do. You find not using it better? That’s great, that option is the default in all of the distributives.

      • 31337@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, I agree. I do use Flatpaks, Snaps, and Appimages sometimes if I can’t find a suitable deb repo/package. Flatpak is the best out of the three because they do try to avoid too much duplication through runtimes. I also use Docker quite a bit, which has similar issues (and benefits).