• NeverNudeNo13@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Yeah that proves my point entirely.

    In 1945 they fluoridated the first public water supply.

    In 1979 the first published research began to appear to show how fluoride might be able to remineralize dental enamel.

    • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      45 minutes ago

      In 1945, Grand Rapids became the first city in the world to fluoridate its drinking water.The Grand Rapids water fluoridation study was originally sponsored by the U.S. Surgeon General, but was taken over by the NIDR shortly after the Institute’s inception in 1948. During the 15-year project, researchers monitored the rate of tooth decay among Grand Rapids’ almost 30,000 schoolchildren. After just 11 years, Dean- who was now director of the NIDR-announced an amazing finding. The caries rate among Grand Rapids children born after fluoride was added to the water supply dropped more than 60 percent. This finding, considering the thousands of participants in the study, amounted to a giant scientific breakthrough that promised to revolutionize dental care, making tooth decay for the first time in history a preventable disease for most people.

      • Alteon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        32 minutes ago

        Yeah, I guess that somehow totes proves his point. Super easy to see the world wrong when they have the reading comprehension of a 6th grader.

        • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 minutes ago

          So the person above may think they’re so clever, or whoever fed them that factoid may think that. Notice the claim is remineralization. Maybe that’s true, it may be that a study first showed that in 1975 and that’s not contradicted by your link but that is a non sequitur. It’s not what we’re talking about, it’s not a good faith argument.