• kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    A real shame. With that many assaults, it really should have been a longer sentence.

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        depends on if they had chosen to sentence him for 51 crimes or one crime with 51 incidences. They should have sentenced the husband to 51x20 years, or 1020 years in prison.

        • CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          That’s not how it works in France at all. You get prosecuted on all charges, but only condemned for the most grievous offense. So for a murder+assault+trespassing case, if found guilty of all charges, your sentence would only be for murder.

          As all condemnation it takes context into account, like the assault + trespassing, but if there were limits on murder sentences then you’d only be sentence-able to that crime’s legal sentencing limits (there are none for murder, which is the only crime that has no sentencing limits).

          • Dremor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago

            The US prison system is made for maximal punishment instead of giving a chance for redemption.
            The idea is to keep the prisoners away from society for as long as possible… And got further twisted by for-profit prison as the longer the sentence is, the longer they keep their slave… Sorry, prisoners, for cheap labor.