• redwattlebird@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I get what you’re saying but, respectfully, I think you’re incorrect. The field of science is not about capitalism but the goal of understanding everything around you. Aqueducts were not the result of capitalism. Russia won the space race. Innovations happen regardless. Capitalism drives innovation in specific directions.

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Also id argue that the creation of the smartphone is the result of market forces, which arent unique to and predate Capitalism by millenia. The bronze age collapse happened largely due to the collapse of the grand trade networks and markets that birthed the bronze age, most bronze age societies predate currency as we understand it outright.

      • nexguy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Everything that happened before capitalism happened at an extremely slow pace. We might have smart phones without capitalism and therefore the industrial revolution… but how long? Centuries? Another millenia?

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          The reason things happened at a slow pace wasnt because capitalism sped it up by a particular amount, its because human knowledge builds on itself. Plus capitalism was borne from the enlightenment which was when a shit tonne of ideas that made the scientific revolution possible came to be.

          Capitalism just happened to be the major economic ideology that was gaining favor, id actually argue that social liberalism and Republicanism was the major factor for innovation on a political level.