Judge “in a pickle” after Google demands DOJ stop sharing public trial exhibits::Google continues fight to block public access to key facts in monopoly trial.
So am I hearing this right: Google is concerned about their privacy?
if they havent done anything wrong they should have nothing to hide
Got 'em
They should be happy to share because it will help the public tailor their ads to Google’s preferences
The DOJ seems increasingly concerned that blocking public access to key facts in the trial establishing Google’s alleged monopoly might hurt its case.
That doesn’t make sense to me.
DOJ wants people to realize just how large Google is. Google doesn’t want people to realize how big they are.
Does that have an impact on the outcome of the trial? Do they just want to sway public opinion for the purpose of future prosecution?
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Mehta said Google put him “in a pickle” by insisting that Roszak’s testimony be confidential so that the public wouldn’t understand the full context of the “embarrassing” email.
Nylen said that she quickly “objected and asked that Bloomberg have an opportunity to have a lawyer present to argue for continued public access.”
Judge Mehta said that he would make a final ruling on Wednesday morning, but “in the meantime,” Nylen noted that “all the documents that have been released” by the DOJ were “pulled back” and “the Justice Department’s page” was “no longer online,” at least temporarily.
That website is currently accessible again, but Bloomberg reported that “emails, charts and internal presentations” are still unavailable to the public, and Mehta still hasn’t made his ruling on whether the DOJ can resume sharing any new exhibits.
Civil rights groups tracking the trial have previously criticized Mehta for protecting Google’s privacy over the public’s interest.
The DOJ seems increasingly concerned that blocking public access to key facts in the trial establishing Google’s alleged monopoly might hurt its case.
The original article contains 731 words, the summary contains 176 words. Saved 76%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
Google is a corporation, not a person. It shouldn’t have privacy rights like a person.
Google is a corporation, not a person.
Not in America.
Corporate person only when convenient.
“Google’s privacy” - isn’t that an oxymoron?
