• s20@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wait. You mean a country that takes education seriously and doesn’t kowtow to religious nonsense is better at science than a country where “evolution is just a theory” appears in high school textbooks?

    Who could have guessed?

    (Before you jump on me, this is not an endorsement of the Chinese government, or even their education system; it’s just an acknowledgement of one aspect of the two nations education systems).

    • jasory@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      China may not have religious nonsense in textbooks post-genocide Cultural Revolution, but it does have superstitious nonsense so your distinction isn’t really valuable.

      The real reason is that China has a huge population 4x that of the US, and like you already mentioned has a strong culture of valuing education because like in most recently (or currently) impoverished nations education is often the best way to improve your conditions. The US doesn’t really have this problem, college graduates make more money but the alternative isn’t living in abject poverty or even starving; most highschool graduates do just fine.

      “It’s just an acknowledgement of one aspect of the two nations education systems”

      How does one acknowledge a distinction that doesn’t exist in reality?

        • jasory@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nope, I pretty clearly said population size and then provided a description of why poor or nouveau-riche countries tend to highly prioritize education unlike the US.

      • ink
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        it does have superstitious nonsense

        source? do you teach in China, or have such books at hand? i’m genuinely curious. please not some tabloid or the likes.

        I mean i’ve heard they aggrandise their traditional medicine without proof and such but haven’t heard it’s right in textbooks.

      • s20@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s just an acknowledgement of one aspect of the two nations education systems

        Wow. Just had to be a dick, didn’t you? Well, big man, hope you have a nice day.

        • jasory@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          “Oh, no someone politely pointed out that I asserted unfounded conjectures as true on a public forum, what a dick!”

          • s20@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            “Oh no, someone pointed out I’m a dick in a public forum! I’ll mock him because that’s that’s dicks do!”

            Sad dude. Just be less of a dick.

      • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        China may not have religious nonsense in textbooks post-genocide Cultural Revolution, but it does have superstitious nonsense so your distinction isn’t really valuable.

        China has superstitious nonsense in it’s textbooks? Such as what?

  • andruid@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Interesting on the domestic increase in citations being a factor there. I wonder what lead to that.

    • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      One factor might be that persecution of Chinese-Americans has led to many prominent scientists returning from the US to China in recent years. Their new output would contain and be domestic citations.